Is this considered acceptable?

[devilsmile]

Well, I guess that settles it  

You really do believe in murdering people of different opinions than yours. Bravo. If you happen to grow up and change your mind within say 10 years I really wish you come back to these posts to see how cringe worthy they are. You went from disliking immigrants to spreading death threats and nazi propaganda within a single thread. Incredible.

There it is. The "nazi propaganda" card. Muslim raping a 7 year old european native is such nazi propaganda. Accusations like that just puts a "dumb ass" stamp on your forehead. I hope you understad that I think you're completely ignorant. You shouldn't have a voice.

First you seemed that you wanted to have a good debate, and I addressed every point you gave me to take a stand on, but THEN you refuse to do the same and call me a nazi indirectly.

I agree it settles it, you're dumb and you should learn some impartialism and see things as they are, stop sugar coating and taste bitter reality

[SuperTed]

TBH, I agree with lovemonkey. You can't really defend the actions of a deranged psychopath who murdered innocent people regardless of how opposed to immigration you may be.
Besides, if anyone deserves to be killed, than surely it would be the Marxist politicians who support and push the multicultural agenda rather than the migrants themselves.

[devilsmile]

TBH, I agree with lovemonkey. You can't really defend the actions of a deranged psychopath who murdered innocent people regardless of how opposed to immigration you may be.
Besides, if anyone deserves to be killed, than surely it would be the Marxist politicians who support and push the multicultural agenda rather than the migrants themselves.

This I can agree with. But lovemonkey would consider you a nazi.

[Raymondo]

What's your point?

The people who persecuted Irish immigrants (19th century "native" Americans, 20th century Brits) said exactly the same things you say now.

It's interesting.

[lovemonkey]

There it is. The "nazi propaganda" card. Muslim raping a 7 year old european native is such nazi propaganda. Accusations like that just puts a "dumb ass" stamp on your forehead. I hope you understad that I think you're completely ignorant. You shouldn't have a voice.

First you seemed that you wanted to have a good debate, and I addressed every point you gave me to take a stand on, but THEN you refuse to do the same and call me a nazi indirectly.

I agree it settles it, you're dumb and you should learn some impartialism and see things as they are, stop sugar coating and taste bitter reality

The 'nazi-propaganda' part comes from your claims about western media being controlled by zionists. It may be true or it may not, but the fact still remains that it is a cornerstone in nazi-propaganda.

Why shouldn't I have a voice? You don't believe in free speech and right of dissent? (hint: if you don't, that puts you even further down the rabbit hole that is nazism)

[devilsmile]

The 'nazi-propaganda' part comes from your claims about western media being controlled by zionists. It may be true or it may not, but the fact still remains that it is a cornerstone in nazi-propaganda.

Why shouldn't I have a voice? You don't believe in free speech and right of dissent? (hint: if you don't, that puts you even further down the rabbit hole that is nazism)

it's not nazi propaganda. Zionists aren't even real jews, zionism is a nationalistic movement created to take god out of the equation and convince the world to have white guilt and also to think that jews can get away with anything, it's an extreme political party, like nazis were. It's like zionists represent jews like nazis represented the white race. Well read and educated orthodox rabbis would agree with me, bunch of them rebel against zionist propaganda all the time.

The difference between a liberal phony like you and me is that I look at topics from all possible angles. You only want to see what your conditoned mind tells you look at. You're the radical minded here and that's why you shouldn't have a voice.

[FitnessFrenzy]

There's no point in trying to seriously debate "Lovemonkey".  The guy is a blind retard.  He still thinks that "racist" and "fascist" are insults, for fuck's sake.  You'll never change his mind by reasoning with him.

Let's just make fun of him, and people like him.  When dealing with SJWs, rhetoric is more effective than dialectic.  That is all.  

I can't see how that image fits into your line of reasoning.

[SuperTed]

This I can agree with. But lovemonkey would consider you a nazi.

My history teacher in college told me he was alarmed that I seemed to be a "fascist sympathizer".

I think lovemonkey opposes the killing of innocent people, regardless of their race or religion. I think that's the opinion most sane people should hold.
There are comments here suggesting that the killing of refugee's is acceptable. I don't think I need to explain why having this opinion is morally depraved.

I'm not happy about the mass influx of Muslim migrants into Europe but I think there are ways to stop it that won't involve committing a genocide.  

[lovemonkey]

it's not nazi propaganda. Zionists aren't even real jews, zionism is a nationalistic movement created to take god out of the equation and convince the world to have white guilt and also to think that jews can get away with anything, it's an extreme political party, like nazis were. It's like zionists represent jews like nazis represented the white race. Well read and educated orthodox rabbis would agree with me, bunch of them rebel against zionist propaganda all the time.

The difference between a liberal phony like you and me is that I look at topics from all possible angles. You only want to see what your conditoned mind tells you look at. You're the radical minded here and that's why you shouldn't have a voice.

It is, in fact. No matter if it happens to be true or not, it still is one of the main things Neo-Nazi's like to yell about.

You are like a child, you know that? Covering your ears and going "lalalalala" when somebody disagrees with you. "you shouldn't have a voice"... Wars have been fought to defeat that sort of thinking. At least try to stand up for your opinions and take comfort in the fact that if some 'lib-tard' argues with you, you'll win the argument easily by the use of facts and logic, right? Why silence the lib-tards? Are you that weak?

[OneMoreRep]

Without reading the entire thread, the issue regarding acceptability is a delicate one as it brings to question how far should Freedom of Speech extend.

Some people don't like Muslims. Other people don't like Jews. Furthermore, many other people throughout the world have a xenophobic approach towards anyone that doesn't seem to fit their local communities.

We are not promoting any propaganda here that would suggest that as a site/entity we want to eradicate any particular religious or racial groups. Here at GetBig, we hate everyone equally, we are not prejudice in that respect.

Every other day I remove anti-Semitic information (be it towards Israelis, Jews or even the Hebrews of Wiggs' determination). Likewise, I try my best to remove any hate-filled comments towards any religion as a whole. There are enough innocent people that follow religions which are, in turn, very fucked up by way of their belief system. That said, these people that follow aren't necessarily accomplices in all instances, but instead could simply be seen as mindless sheep. Moreover, not every Muslim is bad, just like not every Jew hates Muslims, just like not every white person is racist towards black people, just like not every Hebrew hates Israeli Jews and vice versa, you guys get the idea.

Regarding kwon's statements, he is simply employing his freedom of speech. Now, if he were to start posting pictures of Muslim children getting harmed or innocent Muslims getting executed and promoting said activity as the right thing to do, then it would be a different situation.

Does he like Muslims? It would seem that he doesn't.

Does he have a right to dislike anyone? Sure.

Can he exercise his freedom of speech by posting his true feelings about any particular group? Sure.

If someone feels highly offended and reports it to us, will we remove it? Most likely, after review.

Freedom of speech guys, it's part of the American way and as long as you are not hurting anyone else, we are free to voice our opinions regardless of whether they are positive or not.

"1"

[devilsmile]

It is, in fact. No matter if it happens to be true or not, it still is one of the main things Neo-Nazi's like to yell about.

You are like a child, you know that? Covering your ears and going "lalalalala" when somebody disagrees with you. "you shouldn't have a voice"... Wars have been fought to defeat that sort of thinking. At least try to stand up for your opinions and take comfort in the fact that if some 'lib-tard' argues with you, you'll win the argument easily by the use of facts and logic, right? Why silence the lib-tards? Are you that weak?

I do use facts and logics. As soon as I hit your partial views that don't take any reasoning you ignore what I say. You have kindergarden level reasoning.

Even when there's actual jews who oppose zionism a great deal you completely diregard it because that's what you have been told. You're the one who cover your own ears to ignore facts. Try truth for once.

Do you see what superted said?`It's perfectly reasonable to me. He also said, ironically, that his history teacher told him that he seemed a bit fascist sympathizer... even tho he is completely reasonable! I bet his teacher was a racist.

[Yamcha]

Without reading the entire thread, the issue regarding acceptability is a delicate one as it brings to question how far should Freedom of Speech extend.

Some people don't like Muslims. Other people don't like Jews. Furthermore, many other people throughout the world have a xenophobic approach towards anyone that doesn't seem to fit their local communities.

We are not promoting any propaganda here that would suggest that as a site/entity we want to eradicate any particular religious or racial groups. Here at GetBig, we hate everyone equally, we are not prejudice in that respect.

Every other day I remove anti-Semitic information (be it towards Israelis, Jews or even the Hebrews of Wiggs' determination). Likewise, I try my best to remove any hate-filled comments towards any religion as a whole. There are enough innocent people that follow religions which are, in turn, very fucked up by way of their belief system. That said, these people that follow aren't necessarily accomplices in all instances, but instead could simply be seen as mindless sheep. Moreover, not every Muslim is bad, just like not every Jew hates Muslims, just like not every white person is racist towards black people, just like not every Hebrew hates Israeli Jews and vice versa, you guys get the idea.

Regarding kwon's statements, he is simply employing his freedom of speech. Now, if he were to start posting pictures of Muslim children getting harmed or innocent Muslims getting executed and promoting said activity as the right thing to do, then it would be a different situation.

Does he like Muslims? It would seem that he doesn't.

Does he have a right to dislike anyone? Sure.

Can he exercise his freedom of speech by posting his true feelings about any particular group? Sure.

If someone feels highly offended and reports it to us, will we remove it? Most likely, after review.

Freedom of speech guys, it's part of the American way and as long as you are not hurting anyone else, we are free to voice our opinions regardless of whether they are positive or not.

"1"

'Merica

[lovemonkey]

Without reading the entire thread, the issue regarding acceptability is a delicate one as it brings to question how far should Freedom of Speech extend.

Some people don't like Muslims. Other people don't like Jews. Furthermore, many other people throughout the world have a xenophobic approach towards anyone that doesn't seem to fit their local communities.

We are not promoting any propaganda here that would suggest that as a site/entity we want to eradicate any particular religious or racial groups. Here at GetBig, we hate everyone equally, we are not prejudice in that respect.

Every other day I remove anti-Semitic information (be it towards Israelis, Jews or even the Hebrews of Wiggs' determination). Likewise, I try my best to remove any hate-filled comments towards any religion as a whole. There are enough innocent people that follow religions which are, in turn, very fucked up by way of their belief system. That said, these people that follow aren't necessarily accomplices in all instances, but instead could simply be seen as mindless sheep. Moreover, not every Muslim is bad, just like not every Jew hates Muslims, just like not every white person is racist towards black people, just like not every Hebrew hates Israeli Jews and vice versa, you guys get the idea.

Regarding kwon's statements, he is simply employing his freedom of speech. Now, if he were to start posting pictures of Muslim children getting harmed or innocent Muslims getting executed and promoting said activity as the right thing to do, then it would be a different situation.

Does he like Muslims? It would seem that he doesn't.

Does he have a right to dislike anyone? Sure.

Can he exercise his freedom of speech by posting his true feelings about any particular group? Sure.

If someone feels highly offended and reports it to us, will we remove it? Most likely, after review.

Freedom of speech guys, it's part of the American way and as long as you are not hurting anyone else, we are free to voice our opinions regardless of whether they are positive or not.

"1"

I understand what you're saying, but this forum and its moderation is not really a constitutional matter of Freedom of Speech. You are free to moderate this board as you wish, without violating the constitution. Hate speech on the other hand, is in fact a crime that you can be prosecuted for in most countries.

I'm not advocating that you try to silence these people. That doesn't solve anything. What I intended to do with this thread was to probe what the consensus around here was and if calling for the murder of children is acceptable. To be honest it's been pretty shocking.

You are a moderator and constantly have to make choices of what flies and what doesn't. In front of you have someone that openly wishes more children were murdered. Even if you insist on letting people saying whatever they want, I'm assuming it makes you cringe at the very least? I surely hope so. If you want getbig.com to be a place where people can say that, then that is a decision made by YOU. Not the Constitution.

EDIT: Perhaps you are only referring to the 'idea' of Freedom of Speech and not to its constitutional implications. Either way I think the post above conveys the same message.

[lovemonkey]

I do use facts and logics. As soon as I hit your partial views that don't take any reasoning you ignore what I say. You have kindergarden level reasoning.

Even when there's actual jews who oppose zionism a great deal you completely diregard it because that's what you have been told. You're the one who cover your own ears to ignore facts. Try truth for once.

Do you see what superted said?`It's perfectly reasonable to me. He also said, ironically, that his history teacher told him that he seemed a bit fascist sympathizer... even tho he is completely reasonable! I bet his teacher was a racist.

I think we can both agree that our discussion is going nowhere. You get more frustrated at me for disagreeing with you, and I get more depressed by every post you make by how low some people can sink.

I've had it with you. Call me all the names you want. Your views on humanity are disgusting.

[Stephano]

I can't see how that image fits into your line of reasoning.

I had earlier compared "Lovemonkey" to "Captain Sweden", a common chan meme.  Captain Sweden always does whatever he can to say "LOOK HOW TOLERANT I AM!  LOOK!!" -- he's just like "Lovemonkey."  
The image therefore represents "Lovemonkey."


Look at these migrants arriving in their thousands.  So many women and children saved!!  


We can't be harsh enough with these people, they must be removed by any means necessary, and anybody who makes excuses for them is dangerous.

[Yamcha]

I had earlier compared "Lovemonkey" to "Captain Sweden", a common chan meme.  Captain Sweden always does whatever he can to say "LOOK HOW TOLERANT I AM!  LOOK!!" -- he's just like "Lovemonkey."  
The image therefore represents "Lovemonkey."


Look at these migrants arriving in their thousands.  So many women and children saved!!  


We can't be harsh enough with these people, they must be removed by any means necessary, and anybody who makes excuses for them is dangerous.

Lovemonkey 

[devilsmile]

I think we can both agree that our discussion is going nowhere. You get more frustrated at me for disagreeing with you, and I get more depressed by every post you make by how low some people can sink.

I've had it with you. Call me all the names you want. Your views on humanity are disgusting.

liberals are seldomly cabable to have a proper debate, they only want to discuss about their narrow view points and that's it. I hope you see the light one day.

[Europe]

liberals are seldomly cabable to have a proper debate, they only want to discuss about their narrow view points and that's it. I hope you see the light one day.

I agree with Devilsmile.

[mr.turbo]

I had earlier compared "Lovemonkey" to "Captain Sweden", a common chan meme.  Captain Sweden always does whatever he can to say "LOOK HOW TOLERANT I AM!  LOOK!!" -- he's just like "Lovemonkey."  
The image therefore represents "Lovemonkey."


Look at these migrants arriving in their thousands.  So many women and children saved!!  


We can't be harsh enough with these people, they must be removed by any means necessary, and anybody who makes excuses for them is dangerous.

here come stefano with the white nationalist schtick, he thinks the nazi project is worth another try but with a few tweaks here and there.

[mr.turbo]

I understand what you're saying, but this forum and its moderation is not really a constitutional matter of Freedom of Speech. You are free to moderate this board as you wish, without violating the constitution. Hate speech on the other hand, is in fact a crime that you can be prosecuted for in most countries.

I'm not advocating that you try to silence these people. That doesn't solve anything. What I intended to do with this thread was to probe what the consensus around here was and if calling for the murder of children is acceptable. To be honest it's been pretty shocking.

You are a moderator and constantly have to make choices of what flies and what doesn't. In front of you have someone that openly wishes more children were murdered. Even if you insist on letting people saying whatever they want, I'm assuming it makes you cringe at the very least? I surely hope so. If you want getbig.com to be a place where people can say that, then that is a decision made by YOU. Not the Constitution.

EDIT: Perhaps you are only referring to the 'idea' of Freedom of Speech and not to its constitutional implications. Either way I think the post above conveys the same message.

the unfortunate effect of allowing free speech is that it permits the bottom feeders a voice. I suspect there's nowhere else to go with this material so these fellas use this channel because it simply wouldn't fly anywhere else.

for the record I don't agree with killing innocent children either

[el numero uno]

Without reading the entire thread, the issue regarding acceptability is a delicate one as it brings to question how far should Freedom of Speech extend.

Some people don't like Muslims. Other people don't like Jews. Furthermore, many other people throughout the world have a xenophobic approach towards anyone that doesn't seem to fit their local communities.

We are not promoting any propaganda here that would suggest that as a site/entity we want to eradicate any particular religious or racial groups. Here at GetBig, we hate everyone equally, we are not prejudice in that respect.

Every other day I remove anti-Semitic information (be it towards Israelis, Jews or even the Hebrews of Wiggs' determination). Likewise, I try my best to remove any hate-filled comments towards any religion as a whole. There are enough innocent people that follow religions which are, in turn, very fucked up by way of their belief system. That said, these people that follow aren't necessarily accomplices in all instances, but instead could simply be seen as mindless sheep. Moreover, not every Muslim is bad, just like not every Jew hates Muslims, just like not every white person is racist towards black people, just like not every Hebrew hates Israeli Jews and vice versa, you guys get the idea.

Regarding kwon's statements, he is simply employing his freedom of speech. Now, if he were to start posting pictures of Muslim children getting harmed or innocent Muslims getting executed and promoting said activity as the right thing to do, then it would be a different situation.

Does he like Muslims? It would seem that he doesn't.

Does he have a right to dislike anyone? Sure.

Can he exercise his freedom of speech by posting his true feelings about any particular group? Sure.

If someone feels highly offended and reports it to us, will we remove it? Most likely, after review.

Freedom of speech guys, it's part of the American way and as long as you are not hurting anyone else, we are free to voice our opinions regardless of whether they are positive or not.

"1"

The good thing about Getbig is that we can post pretty much anything we want.
The bad thing is that idiots can do that too.

[Sokolsky]

With regards to the killing of children.
Yes, I do believe it is warrented under certain circumstances. Children raised with these type of programs for example will never be able to function in a 'normal' western society.

[Raymondo]

The good thing about Getbig is that we can post pretty much anything we want.
The bad thing is that idiots can do that too.

this

[Simple Simon]

So I'll take that as you just made up the above claims about me supporting ISIS and rapists.

This thread was about Kwon_2 saying that he wished more children were murdered. I'm not obligated to condemn every single crime committed by either immigrants or fanatics in order to make this point. It's like me asking you to condemn every single crime committed by right wing extremists since the beginning of time just so you can have an opinion. It's absurd.

But you're absolutely right that rape is rape and murder is murder no matter who does it. I'm in no way supporting immigrants or fanatics who does such things. But wait, according to you murder is justified, as long as the victims are muslims or immigrants. Am I wrong in saying this?

People kill people all the time, its what people do, they dont even need a reason.

Get over it FFS.
who cares.

[Simple Simon]

The 'nazi-propaganda' part comes from your claims about western media being controlled by zionists. It may be true or it may not, but the fact still remains that it is a cornerstone in nazi-propaganda.

Why shouldn't I have a voice? You don't believe in free speech and right of dissent? (hint: if you don't, that puts you even further down the rabbit hole that is nazism)

Why shouldnt ISIS have a voice and free will do do what they like?