DEBATE PART 3!!!!

[JOHN MATRIX]

Carson will continue to have half closed eyes and speak softly and meekly, everyone will say he didn't do well but his numbers will continue to be high regardless???

Bush will still get 50% of all the questions?

the liberal partisan moderator will do hatchet job on TRUMP???

Cruz will get one question 45 minutes in, answer perfectly, then get ignored for another 45 minutes??

a 1%-er will go for broke and get crazy??

make or break for Carly??

[240 is Back]

the liberal partisan moderator will do hatchet job on TRUMP???

If I, and George Will, are correct... Tonight we'll see a coordination of attacks from moderator/CNBC and Trump.  Sure, they'll still take their potshots at trump regarding him losing in this week's polls... BUT the line of questioning from trump vs carson will be the same.

Religion + His changing stories on violence.

RIGHT NOW - MSNBC/Esquire are already breaking the "modified" versions of his violent stories.

and Deana Bass, carson campaign story, just sat there mouth ajar, unable to even comment on the multiple stories.  She's on right now.  Babbling, unprepared for the allegations of the multiple versions he's told. 

[JOHN MATRIX]

that's just his usual though lol and he hasn't affected his support

[240 is Back]

that's just his usual though lol and he hasn't affected his support

If the stories are true, then YES, repubs love a tough guy, love violence.

BUT if the stories are lies, repubs will abandon him.   That Popeyes robbery just didn't happen.  The police confirm.  And they're now opening up and comparing all of Carson's versions of teh stabbing story, huge differences.

CNBC will likely ask him about it tonight, and he'll deflect, but at some point, the reasonable voters that abandoned Carly for lying, and moved to Carson, will move on to a Cruz or someone....

Being busted caught lying hurt Carly - I think it'll hurt Carson too.

[240 is Back]

g

[JOHN MATRIX]

neither of them lied

[240 is Back]

Rubio has skipped 30% of his votes.  and he's blaming a newspaper for pointing it out.

[240 is Back]

huckabee just said social security is NOT entitlements.  it's the people's money, taken against their will, they deserve to get it back.

He's right.  I've been yelling this.   

[headhuntersix]

Cruz is killing it......

[tonymctones]

huckabee just said social security is NOT entitlements.  it's the people's money, taken against their will, they deserve to get it back.

He's right.  I've been yelling this.  

if you receive more than you put in its an entitlement...and the reason youre yelling about it is b.c youre living off it you POS

[TuHolmes]

if you receive more than you put in its an entitlement...and the reason youre yelling about it is b.c youre living off it you POS

I always hear about this, but how many people actually get more than they put in?

Plus, factor in the people who put in and die before they can ever collect it... I'm not sure I buy that there's a bunch of free loaders getting social security in and of itself.

I've been putting into it since I was 12, I highly doubt I will get everything back that I've been forced to put into it.

[tonymctones]

I always hear about this, but how many people actually get more than they put in?

Plus, factor in the people who put in and die before they can ever collect it... I'm not sure I buy that there's a bunch of free loaders getting social security in and of itself.

I've been putting into it since I was 12, I highly doubt I will get everything back that I've been forced to put into it.

how would we be out of money if people didnt take out more than they put in?

[tonymctones]

how would we be out of money if people didnt take out more than they put in?

seriously though...

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2013/feb/01/medicare-and-social-security-what-you-paid-what-yo/

"According to this calculation, past and current generations will pay $71.3 trillion in payroll taxes but will receive $93.4 trillion in benefits. Adjusting for past and future transfers from the federal Treasury, the difference between "paid-in" and "paid-out" works out to $21.6 trillion."

[TuHolmes]

Because the money is sent to other programs and not left in the bank like it should be.

If the money we put in, is left in an interest bearing account, it would be fine.

[tonymctones]

I always hear about this, but how many people actually get more than they put in?

Plus, factor in the people who put in and die before they can ever collect it... I'm not sure I buy that there's a bunch of free loaders getting social security in and of itself.

I've been putting into it since I was 12, I highly doubt I will get everything back that I've been forced to put into it.

understand holmes Im not necessarily for cutting social security benefits, maybe delaying them.

The fact is though if you take out more than you get, its an entitlement

[TuHolmes]

understand holmes Im not necessarily for cutting social security benefits, maybe delaying them.

The fact is though if you take out more than you get, its an entitlement

Hey, I'd be perfectly fine taking all of what I've put into it, in one lump when I turned 65. One lump sum... Done.

I'd be able to put it into the bank and compounding interest would probably take care of me forever.

That's why it sucks.

[240 is Back]

Cruz is killing it......

THIS

[240 is Back]

Hey, I'd be perfectly fine taking all of what I've put into it, in one lump when I turned 65. One lump sum... Done.

I'd be able to put it into the bank and compounding interest would probably take care of me forever.

That's why it sucks.

BUT every time a stock does bad, some 2 or 3% of our retired population will lose their shirts.

They aren't 25 with decades to rebuild.  Suddenly they're dependent on the system or starving/picking up their rifles and going hunting for food/meds.

I love the idea of privatization EXCEPT what do you do when we have another 2008 crash... where you have 10 to 20% of the retired population instantly BROKE.   If I'm 75 and I need my meds or I die, you bet your ass I'm taking my AR-15 out and robbing some punk ass college potheads for their wallets.

So yes, unless you want tens of thousands of elderly shitting on the streets - privatization doesn't work.

[tonymctones]

Hey, I'd be perfectly fine taking all of what I've put into it, in one lump when I turned 65. One lump sum... Done.

I'd be able to put it into the bank and compounding interest would probably take care of me forever.

That's why it sucks.

I agree with you broham, I would be more than happy with my money back.

Fact is though we arent getting shit back, we need to pay for people like rob

[tonymctones]

BUT every time a stock does bad, some 2 or 3% of our retired population will lose their shirts.

They aren't 25 with decades to rebuild.  Suddenly they're dependent on the system or starving/picking up their rifles and going hunting for food/meds.

I love the idea of privatization EXCEPT what do you do when we have another 2008 crash... where you have 10 to 20% of the retired population instantly BROKE.   If I'm 75 and I need my meds or I die, you bet your ass I'm taking my AR-15 out and robbing some punk ass college potheads for their wallets.

So yes, unless you want tens of thousands of elderly shitting on the streets - privatization doesn't work.

LOL stricter gun legislation is a pipe dream but this is reality? hahahaha fear monger much?

[240 is Back]

LOL stricter gun legislation is a pipe dream but this is reality? hahahaha fear monger much?

earlier, you said hilary called for mandatory gun turn in.   Link, please?

[tonymctones]

earlier, you said hilary called for mandatory gun turn in.   Link, please?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHA first I said that she was contemplating a mandatory buy back....HAHAHAHHAHA what a fucking reach.

Second, i quoted your retarded ass from the thread moron.

[240 is Back]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHA first I said that she was contemplating a mandatory buy back....HAHAHAHHAHA what a fucking reach.

Second, i quoted your retarded ass from the thread moron.

so hilary never said that?

i know when someone calls names, they don't have a lot of win in their argument.

[tonymctones]

earlier, you said hilary called for mandatory gun turn in.   Link, please?

here you go you fucking idiot

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=585148.0

and the link to the original story...

http://www.vox.com/2015/8/27/9212725/australia-buyback?ref=yfp

and a quote from the article for your dumb ass

Hillary Clinton praised the gun control measures Australia adopted in 1996-'97 at a campaign stop Friday, saying, "It would be worth considering doing it on the national level," in the US. She stopped short of outright saying the US should copy the laws, but expressed sympathy with the idea. "I do not know enough detail to tell you how we would do it, or how would it work," she told a voter who asked about Australia, per a transcript from the Washington Free Beacon, "but certainly your example is worth looking at."

[tonymctones]

the gun control measure australia adopted was......WAIT FOR IT!!!!














































A MANDATORY BUY BACK