Retard.
The Crusades were calculating and for profit.
Religion attracts nutters and dumb losers (eg IRA and "Irish" American supporters with less Irish blood in them than the average bastardised white Englishman) for causes that gives these freaks the pretence of glory.
The problem for all of us with Islam is that it represents a clarion call for hate and violence to all the (literally) inbred wastes of space who have looked on at more successful people and felt the need to make their mark.
The Crusades were a justified response to Muslim aggression.
The first Crusade, in particular, was both successful and sublime. We need more men like this:
"On Monday, 28 June, the crusaders emerged from the city gate, with Raymond of Aguilers carrying the Holy Lance before them. Kerbogha hesitated against his generals’ pleadings, hoping to attack them all at once rather than one division at a time, but he underestimated their size. He pretended to retreat to draw the crusaders to rougher terrain, while his archers continuously pelted the advancing crusaders with arrows. A detachment was dispatched to the crusader left wing, which was not protected by the river, but Bohemond quickly formed a seventh division and beat them back. The Turks were inflicting many casualties, including Adhemar’s standard-bearer, and Kerbogha set fire to the grass between his position and the crusaders, but this did not deter them: they had visions of three saints riding along with them: St. George, St. Demetrius, and St. Maurice. The battle was brief and disastrous for the Turks. Duqaq deserted Kerbogha and this desertion reduced the great numerical advantage the Muslim army had over its Christian opponents. Soon the defeated Muslim troops were in panicked retreat."
