Whats wrong with primary sources? I don't want you to take my word for it.
There is nothing wrong with primary sources. It's one thing to quote something and link a reference to the source as validation and that you are not just making it up but it's quite another to speak for yourself.
I know what Richard Dawkins says about God and creation and you know what C.S. Lewis has to say about Christianity but I am not debating them I'm debating you.
If you ask me a question about why I support the private ownership of gun control and I just quote you the 2nd amendment or link a video of John Lott how does that help? How is that interesting?
It's raining like hell right now here in Hawaii so I'm stuck in my hovel on a Saturday so I'm just doing one of things I like to do most: debate some the great issues of life. I'd rather have the give and take of a (somewhat) real time debate. I can't ask questions or challenge Bernie Sanders when watching his youtube vids.