Author Topic: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?  (Read 5559 times)

Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« on: December 29, 2015, 08:06:10 PM »
Just playing devil's advocate here, but he is supposedly 9lbs heavier, and he doesn't seem to have the distension as bad as in 03. Condition is still on point... although it looks like his left side might be starting to atrophy a bit.

Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2015, 08:08:40 PM »
Some of '03

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29905
  • Expunged
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2015, 08:09:52 PM »
One of the bigger guys. 

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #3 on: December 29, 2015, 08:11:39 PM »
Conditioning is suffering in those pics and did so the heavier he got.  He's in hard condition, but well off his best.  His best conditioned Olympia by far was 1998.  2004, although much heavier and more massive, was a far cry from his best, as was 2003.

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24808
  • SC è un asino
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #4 on: December 29, 2015, 09:08:03 PM »
Running out of thread ideas?
Y

Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #5 on: December 29, 2015, 11:56:35 PM »
Running out of thread ideas?

No more than you are running out of ways to be a caustic curmudgeon...

Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #6 on: December 30, 2015, 01:47:28 AM »
I thought this was interesting. Shows how badly off he was in '02...

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33122
  • Nasser Endorses Trump 🇺🇸
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #7 on: December 30, 2015, 03:27:41 AM »
I thought this was interesting. Shows how badly off he was in '02...

The most-muscular pic of Ronnie from the 2000 Olympia is freaky. Directly under it is the 2004 pic. I think that he weighed at least 20lbs more in 2004.... but he was better in 2000

Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #8 on: December 30, 2015, 03:32:17 AM »
2000 grand prix. Holy shit he was huge in 2000.

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33122
  • Nasser Endorses Trump 🇺🇸
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #9 on: December 30, 2015, 03:36:24 AM »
2000 Mr O

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33122
  • Nasser Endorses Trump 🇺🇸
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #10 on: December 30, 2015, 03:40:39 AM »
Ronnie looked bad in 2002. No wonder Gunter was a serious threat

Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #11 on: December 30, 2015, 03:41:52 AM »
Really blew his prep that year... amazing how much he lost from the BFTO clip..

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33122
  • Nasser Endorses Trump 🇺🇸
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #12 on: December 30, 2015, 03:44:37 AM »
Jay @ 2002 Arnold would've beat Ronnie

Brass Balls

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 140
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #13 on: December 30, 2015, 03:57:36 AM »
Who cares how great he was. He looks like total garbage now.

Tha Grim Lifter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1558
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #14 on: December 30, 2015, 04:09:36 AM »
I thought 99 he was the best. 98 was better condition but 99 he was very close to it and outmassed everyone a lot more.

He kept getting too heavy and thinking the extra weight was all muscle. He should have dieted further down in later years although 2005 was good at 275.

Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #15 on: December 30, 2015, 09:11:38 AM »
Poor Ronnie was a wreck in '07..

Coffeed

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2938
  • Athletes representative for Grifted Nutrition.
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #16 on: December 30, 2015, 09:17:33 AM »
Who was his drug dealer prep coach each year?

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33122
  • Nasser Endorses Trump 🇺🇸
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #17 on: December 30, 2015, 09:21:46 AM »
Who was his drug dealer prep coach each year?

Chad Nicholls

bigmikecox

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14363
  • SAY MY NAME!!!!
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #18 on: December 30, 2015, 11:46:41 AM »
His body was starting to break down in 2004

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #19 on: December 30, 2015, 11:52:41 AM »
Who cares how great he was. He looks like total garbage now.

Exactly! Imagine if you dug up Babe Ruth now. He'd look like shit and hit like a real deadbeat.
Just sayin'.

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16180
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #20 on: December 30, 2015, 11:54:16 AM »
He was probably his biggest and freakiest ever at that Russian GP post the 04 Olympia. Thick like an ox.




Disco187

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1051
  • "Fuck Ordinary"
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #21 on: December 30, 2015, 12:06:34 PM »
if you watch ronnies last moch dvd of 2007 you could just see it in his face the whole time he knew his nerve injury was career ending, by 2007 it was more the over, seamed like he wasnt enjoying it any more (hell cant blame the guy though) he had nothing left to prove.

but wow i never realized he looked like shit in 2002 I always thought gunter had a great structure when he was full, great shoulders and arms and chest, lotta striations.

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #22 on: December 30, 2015, 04:03:42 PM »
He was probably his biggest and freakiest ever at that Russian GP post the 04 Olympia. Thick like an ox.





That pic is actually from the 2003 RGP, but yes he was probably his biggest at the 2004 RGP.

The Abdominal Snoman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23503
  • DON'T BE A TRAITOR TO YOUR TRIBE
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #23 on: December 30, 2015, 08:20:46 PM »
Exactly! Imagine if you dug up Babe Ruth now. He'd look like shit and hit like a real deadbeat.
Just sayin'.

Except Babe Ruth quit the game at 40 years old. Ronnie Coleman is still guest posing in his underwear into his 50's :-\

doison

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3448
  • Rum Ham
Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
« Reply #24 on: December 30, 2015, 08:21:46 PM »
Bigger but softer. 

HTH
Y