Author Topic: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution  (Read 5844 times)

Conker

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3189
  • looks like you went for the overcooked potato look
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #50 on: January 26, 2016, 02:31:46 PM »
TBF, people vote for political parties for numerous reasons, not just for their views on immigration. Anti-immigration parties tend to be one policy parties so never gain mass support. However, if there was ever a referendum on immigration and multiculturalism in Western European nations, you can bet the overwhelming majority would vote in favour of much stricter controls.

of course people will not agree with every policy when voting for a party but if immigration was really as big an issue as some make out you would have thought anti immigration parties would have been more to the forefront over the years. with members capable of formulating a coherent range of policies other than as you say just having one policy.

that's the thing, for whatever reason the anti immigration parties generally tend to be run and followed by idiots, harping on about saving "the white race" and other such cr@p that turns the majority of normal people off. i suppose UKIP break the trend to some extent.

yeh you're probably right about people voting for stricter controls on immigration given a referendum but i doubt for the majority it would be on racial grounds.


obsidian

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7522
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #51 on: January 26, 2016, 03:23:11 PM »
"so what is your suggestion? Do you agree mass immigration needs to halt? If you agree that it does, and it is clear that the politicians have no intention of halting it, then what is your suggestion?"

My suggestion to you, if you want to argue against things like mass immigration, and for European states to have greater autonomy, is to arm yourself with the truth. It's no use posting bullshit links and demonstrably false arguments from far-right organisations, because you'll get torn apart by anyone with an ounce of common sense and political awareness. Step away from this Jewish conspiracy and white supremacy nonsense and start separating the truth from the propaganda, because these ideologies only do harm. Inform yourself of the clear distinctions between legal, illegal immigration and genuine asylum. If you want out of the EU, then read about all the arguments for and against EU membership and be prepared to argue your stance using evidence. Learn about the geopolitics of Africa, the Middle East and what's going on right now in Syria; the conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran, the proxy wars being fought by them and our roles involved in it...because there's a reason why millions of people are fleeing from there and you're never going to have a hope in dealing with the fallout unless you address the root causes. Look at what SuperTed mentioned too, regarding the economic factors involved in this, like ageing populations; governments don't do things based on altruism, they make decisions largely based on the economy. If you are able to discuss these things rationally, then you'll get people on your side.

Or if you want to go down the radical route then do it. It's no use posting about it on a bodybuilding forum. I'd completely agree with protesting against certain politicians and kicking the fuck out of groups of sexual predators; absolutely go and do it. Your enemy is not anyone who doesn't happen to be white, though.
I was not asking for your suggestion on what I should do. I wanted to know how you would reduce mass immigration to Europe. Since you said you do not agree with the policy of mass immigration. Yes, promoting the improvement of white birth rates in Europe is a way to do it. However the governments will not do it. Protesting will do nothing. People are already protesting and the media either marginalize them or claim they are a small minority and the rest want this to happen.

So let's say people protest, and still no change. The flooding keeps going on for the next 10-20 years. Millions allowed in. What then? All that protesting and the end result is genocide. Not a good business proposition if you're white and love your culture and history.

You are not offering a solution either. And if history has taught us anything real and violent revolutions get results. And mark my words. It is going to happen. Do you think for one minute people are going to sit by as conditions deteriorate around them?? I very much doubt it. I do see a civil war in Europe's future and I do see a lot of executions in the pipeline.

obsidian

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7522
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #52 on: January 26, 2016, 03:25:06 PM »
Do you think it's the high price for wanting cheap labor?
It is a terrible business deal for white Europeans. Cheap labor is not worth the price of entire cultures. It is a great deal for the elite though. They do deserve everything coming their way and more.

obsidian

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7522
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #53 on: January 26, 2016, 03:30:08 PM »
A practical solution would firstly be to promote the concept of family among native Europeans and encourage them to have more children. One reason Germany took in the migrants was to replace an ageing population. This wouldn't have been necessary if the native Germanic people were healthily procreating.
Yet the governments did not try to improve the birth rates. Instead they asked the tax payer to pay for importing more people. Your practical solution only works if politicians were not bought and paid for traitors. They have demonstrated over and over that they answer to the elite that bribe them and that the white Europeans are second class citizens.

Japan is at least trying to improve their birth rates. They have resisted mass immigration.

It also did not help that fake jewish bankers bankrupted Germany after WW1 and then financed a mad man resulting in white countries going to war with each other, killing millions of young white males in the process.


Fortress

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20748
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #54 on: January 26, 2016, 03:39:57 PM »
No hype, I truly believe numerous civil wars are in the making. Our "leaders" are putting all the right elements into place.

And because of this horrifying backstabbing, I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility that numerous high-level politicians will eventually see the inside of jail cells and/or executed.

Someone like Merkel? She is absolutely risking her life continuing to not act in her country's best interests, not the least of which culturally-speaking.

It's dramatic to state, but the woman is a traitor to her people and her country.


obsidian

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7522
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #55 on: January 26, 2016, 03:40:58 PM »
ok look at the UK as an example. mass immigration (as you'd call it) started around the late 40s early 50s due to a labour shortage following wwII.  since then there has either been a labour or conservative government and both of which in that time have in practice been pro immigration.

there has been 15+ general elections since the end of the wwII and each time one of these two parties has been elected...so if "the people never supported mass immigration" why do they still to this day keep voting for parties that they know are pro immigration?

what you're saying just doesn't make sense unfortunately.

The realities of mass immigration are only now showing its ugly head. White people did not realize they were voting for traitors that were trying to replace their demographic. In the UK the fake jew Ed Miliband sent out search parties to hunt for immigrants. Now all of a sudden he wants to tone it down (but he won't). He deserves public execution.

If the Labour Party was forthcoming and said: "We would like to import 500,000 non-white foreigners into our little island per year, are you ok with this?" people would have said NO! They never were out in the open about it. Now people are resisting it, and yet still they continue. You cannot excuse treason committed by politicians. Even if the public voted for these scumbags, they were still the assholes that betrayed the public. This is genocide.

http://englishnews.org/news-central/resources/resource-a-conclusive-report-jewish-promotion-of-mass-immigration.html

The Jewish Labour party political-fanatic Barbara Roche was appointed as the Minister of State for Asylum and Immigration in 1999, as the first person to hold that ministerial position, after the Asylum and Immigration department was made in 1999 to increase non-white immigration into the UK, under the Jewish occupied Labour majority election victory in 1997.

The Jewish, anti-Germanic racist subversive Barbara Roche also helped to increase non-white immigration into the UK simultaneously from within the Home Office from 1999 to 2001 and then from within the Cabinet Office from 2001-2002 and continues to promote non-whites and anti-Germanic Jewish group efforts to this day, having also led a malicious pro-multiracial attack campaign against UKIP in the 2014 EU elections.

This period saw the biggest legislative and logistical effort to increase immigration into any European nation in history, where it is alleged by ex-Labour minister P.Mandelson, that they [the Jews] in the Labour party, such as Ed Miliband, and Barbara Roche, pushed through an effort to literally send out “search parties,” acting as immigration travel agents to third world countries to look for immigrants, and to advertise immigration to the UK through foreign governments and ethnic groups, especially from Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Eritrea and countless other non-white, third world areas.

obsidian

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7522
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #56 on: January 26, 2016, 03:50:48 PM »
::) You're beyond help. Hurry up and launch your "revolution". No point in calling for everyone else to do it if you're not willing to lead by example. Look into self-immolation or possibly take a run at Merkel whilst wearing a suicide vest. You'll make yourself a legend on here.
See, you can't debate. I asked you what's your solution and you dodged it. And then this post by you. You should change careers faggit - you suck at it.

And we'll see what happens. I knew mass rapes were in Europe's future and it took mere weeks / months. I foresee lots of terrorist activity and civil wars in Europe. It was a terrible business deal and public executions of traitors is the only way to prevent a total genocide in Europe.


obsidian

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7522
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #58 on: January 26, 2016, 03:54:54 PM »
No hype, I truly believe numerous civil wars are in the making. Our "leaders" are putting all the right elements into place.

And because of this horrifying backstabbing, I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility that numerous high-level politicians will eventually see the inside of jail cells and/or executed.

Someone like Merkel? She is absolutely risking her life continuing to not act in her country's best interests, not the least of which culturally-speaking.

It's dramatic to state, but the woman is a traitor to her people and her country.

I totally agree. This is by design - divide and conquer. The whole mess in Syria was fabricated by the elite. They paid mercenaries to go fight in Syria. They destabilized the country just as they did in Iraq. They created the refugees and then decided to flood Europe with them. I expect to see much more of this happening.

The whole ISIS movement is a fucking joke. You have to be a moron to buy into that scam. It is a slick fake jew production. I guess they think we all live in the twilight zone and will believe bullshit after bullshit.

Conker

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3189
  • looks like you went for the overcooked potato look
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #59 on: January 26, 2016, 04:03:16 PM »
No hype, I truly believe numerous civil wars are in the making. Our "leaders" are putting all the right elements into place.

And because of this horrifying backstabbing, I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility that numerous high-level politicians will eventually see the inside of jail cells and/or executed.

Someone like Merkel? She is absolutely risking her life continuing to not act in her country's best interests, not the least of which culturally-speaking.

It's dramatic to state, but the woman is a traitor to her people and her country.



it's all well and good blaming the likes of merkel for opening the doors to refugees. but if it wasn't for the US backed by europe arming rebels to start a civil war in syria, arming rebels in libya and bombing that regime out of power, invading iraq under false pretences and destabilising that country....we wouldn't have millions of refugees fleeing the middle east right now.

you're blaming the wrong people. it is the warmongerers that are to blame for the refugees flooding into europe.

obsidian

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7522
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #60 on: January 26, 2016, 04:07:49 PM »
lol i told you what i think should be done to fix the mass immigration issue, you fucking idiot. It's not my fault if you can't comprehend basic English because you're too busy trying to act like Mystic Meg with your "predictions and foresights" lol. My crystal ball predicts a load more bullshit posts from you, and not much else.
No you didn't. You offered no concrete solutions. And your views are flawed because you are assuming the politicians are trustworthy and act in the best interest of White Europeans. They have shown time and time again they are not and will not act in their best interest. There is not reasoning or debating with traitors.

Donny

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18535
  • getbig Zen Master
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #61 on: January 26, 2016, 04:10:41 PM »
it's all well and good blaming the likes of merkel for opening the doors to refugees. but if it wasn't for the US backed by europe arming rebels to start a civil war in syria, arming rebels in libya and bombing that regime out of power, invading iraq under false pretences and destabilising that country....we wouldn't have millions of refugees fleeing the middle east right now.

you're blaming the wrong people. it is the warmongerers that are to blame for the refugees flooding into europe.
not agreeing with Fortress but the Germans and i mean normal Germans are getting angry. Regardless who started the mess, it´s the common people who have to live with it on a Daily basis and not Merkel.

obsidian

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7522
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #62 on: January 26, 2016, 04:12:08 PM »
it's all well and good blaming the likes of merkel for opening the doors to refugees. but if it wasn't for the US backed by europe arming rebels to start a civil war in syria, arming rebels in libya and bombing that regime out of power, invading iraq under false pretences and destabilising that country....we wouldn't have millions of refugees fleeing the middle east right now.

you're blaming the wrong people. it is the warmongerers that are to blame for the refugees flooding into europe.
It's the same people lol!  ???

Merkel answers to the same people that financed the rebels. It is all engineered.

Merkel was recently meeting with her cabinet and while they were reprimanding her she was fumbling with her phone and totally disinterested in the conversation going on. She does not give a fuck about the implications of her flooding Germany with non-whites. While the women were raped she was having a nice dinner with Putin. Makes you wonder how Putin fits in this whole picture. I believe he answers to the same elite.

Conker

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3189
  • looks like you went for the overcooked potato look
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #63 on: January 26, 2016, 04:31:43 PM »
The realities of mass immigration are only now showing its ugly head. White people did not realize they were voting for traitors that were trying to replace their demographic. In the UK the fake jew Ed Miliband sent out search parties to hunt for immigrants. Now all of a sudden he wants to tone it down (but he won't). He deserves public execution.

If the Labour Party was forthcoming and said: "We would like to import 500,000 non-white foreigners into our little island per year, are you ok with this?" people would have said NO! They never were out in the open about it. Now people are resisting it, and yet still they continue. You cannot excuse treason committed by politicians. Even if the public voted for these scumbags, they were still the assholes that betrayed the public. This is genocide.

http://englishnews.org/news-central/resources/resource-a-conclusive-report-jewish-promotion-of-mass-immigration.html

The Jewish Labour party political-fanatic Barbara Roche was appointed as the Minister of State for Asylum and Immigration in 1999, as the first person to hold that ministerial position, after the Asylum and Immigration department was made in 1999 to increase non-white immigration into the UK, under the Jewish occupied Labour majority election victory in 1997.

The Jewish, anti-Germanic racist subversive Barbara Roche also helped to increase non-white immigration into the UK simultaneously from within the Home Office from 1999 to 2001 and then from within the Cabinet Office from 2001-2002 and continues to promote non-whites and anti-Germanic Jewish group efforts to this day, having also led a malicious pro-multiracial attack campaign against UKIP in the 2014 EU elections.

This period saw the biggest legislative and logistical effort to increase immigration into any European nation in history, where it is alleged by ex-Labour minister P.Mandelson, that they [the Jews] in the Labour party, such as Ed Miliband, and Barbara Roche, pushed through an effort to literally send out “search parties,” acting as immigration travel agents to third world countries to look for immigrants, and to advertise immigration to the UK through foreign governments and ethnic groups, especially from Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Eritrea and countless other non-white, third world areas.

tbf immigration "search parties" as you call them are not even a remotely new thing. the first wave of immigrants from the caribbean and the indian subcontinent were enticed by recruiting campaigns led by the uk government, with offers of free travel and subsidised housing in exchange for coming to work in the uk.

why do you think so many of our doctors and nurses are foreign... because it's part of some jewish master plan to kill the white race or because it makes economic sense to save millions of pounds in training and education costs by importing already fully qualified medical staff from abroad...

Stephano

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1356
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #64 on: January 26, 2016, 05:02:48 PM »
It's the same people lol!  ???

Merkel answers to the same people that financed the rebels. It is all engineered.

Merkel was recently meeting with her cabinet and while they were reprimanding her she was fumbling with her phone and totally disinterested in the conversation going on. She does not give a fuck about the implications of her flooding Germany with non-whites. While the women were raped she was having a nice dinner with Putin. Makes you wonder how Putin fits in this whole picture. I believe he answers to the same elite.

Dude, you're fucking losing it.

Stick to the basics:

-"Migrants" are fucking subhuman slime.
-Importing migrants with room-temperature IQs from third-world backwaters like Syria and Africa is profoundly dysgenic.
-Islam is incompatible with European civilization (Christendom) as we know it.
-The political class is betraying its people.
-Repatriating migrants would be an act of compassion.  The other options are far worse, less humane.
-We need to reestablish nationalism, religion, and tradition in Europe.

Going on and on about Jewish conspiracies, Illuminati, Lizard-men, etc...  this just makes you look unhinged and retarded.  You're not helping the cause -- you're hurting it. 

mr.turbo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4617
  • Team Freedom
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #65 on: January 26, 2016, 05:52:54 PM »
lets not oversimply

obsidian makes a lot of good points, keep doing what you're doing

germany needs to start mass producing stakes,

perhaps importing from scandinavia or some third word rainforest, ideally at a discount.

"

OB1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3222
  • "Happiness equals reality minus expectations."
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #66 on: January 26, 2016, 07:37:54 PM »
It is all engineered.

This.
One giant puppet show.
©

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9381
  • .......
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #67 on: January 26, 2016, 09:22:42 PM »
No hype, I truly believe numerous civil wars are in the making. Our "leaders" are putting all the right elements into place.

And because of this horrifying backstabbing, I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility that numerous high-level politicians will eventually see the inside of jail cells and/or executed.

Someone like Merkel? She is absolutely risking her life continuing to not act in her country's best interests, not the least of which culturally-speaking.

It's dramatic to state, but the woman is a traitor to her people and her country.



Good points.

galain

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1623
  • Getbig!
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #68 on: January 26, 2016, 11:01:13 PM »


Bastards

Are you sure this is Germany? It's not often you see English as the first language on signs here.

Conker

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3189
  • looks like you went for the overcooked potato look
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #69 on: January 27, 2016, 01:55:30 AM »
Dude, you're fucking losing it.

Stick to the basics:

-"Migrants" are fucking subhuman slime.
-Importing migrants with room-temperature IQs from third-world backwaters like Syria and Africa is profoundly dysgenic.
-Islam is incompatible with European civilization (Christendom) as we know it.
-The political class is betraying its people.
-Repatriating migrants would be an act of compassion.  The other options are far worse, less humane.
-We need to reestablish nationalism, religion, and tradition in Europe.

Going on and on about Jewish conspiracies, Illuminati, Lizard-men, etc...  this just makes you look unhinged and retarded.  You're not helping the cause -- you're hurting it.  


talk about the blind leading the blind.

you think labelling migrants as a group as "subhuman slime" is helping your "cause"? lol that sht might fly on getbig or stormfront but in the real world most people with above "room temperature iqs" will find that kind of talk abhorrent.

and how would repatriating migrants work? no doubt you are making the false assumption that all migrants are minimum wage toilet cleaners or benefits scroungers. in reality millions of migrants in europe are affluent business and property owners, so then you need some kind of huge scale expropriation program to enable this repatriation to take place.

so now you're on your to becoming a zimbabwe style pariah state. inward investment starts to rapidly withdraw, as if you are willing to expropriate the assets of people living in your own country, you're more than likely going to turn on foreign investors at some point.


what you're saying is just as ridiculous as obidsan. anyone with half a brain will see through it immediately.

Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #70 on: January 27, 2016, 02:38:53 AM »
It's the same people lol!  ???

Merkel answers to the same people that financed the rebels. It is all engineered.

Merkel was recently meeting with her cabinet and while they were reprimanding her she was fumbling with her phone and totally disinterested in the conversation going on. She does not give a fuck about the implications of her flooding Germany with non-whites. While the women were raped she was having a nice dinner with Putin. Makes you wonder how Putin fits in this whole picture. I believe he answers to the same elite.

This does not compute.
a

Stephano

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1356
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #71 on: January 27, 2016, 02:55:39 AM »
talk about the blind leading the blind.

you think labelling migrants as a group as "subhuman slime" is helping your "cause"? lol that sht might fly on getbig or stormfront but in the real world most people with above "room temperature iqs" will find that kind of talk abhorrent.

and how would repatriating migrants work? no doubt you are making the false assumption that all migrants are minimum wage toilet cleaners or benefits scroungers. in reality millions of migrants in europe are affluent business and property owners, so then you need some kind of huge scale expropriation program to enable this repatriation to take place.

so now you're on your to becoming a zimbabwe style pariah state. inward investment starts to rapidly withdraw, as if you are willing to expropriate the assets of people living in your own country, you're more than likely going to turn on foreign investors at some point.


what you're saying is just as ridiculous as obidsan. anyone with half a brain will see through it immediately.

What's the average IQ in Syria?  Sub-Saharan Africa?  Do you think that it's not dysgenic to import people of such obviously poor stock?  Why do you think that their countries look the way they do?  What do you think Europe will look like, if they become a majority?

"millions of migrants in europe are affluent business and property owners"
Given that the population of Europe is barely 500M, this is an obvious lie.  The migrants are overwhelmingly poor, a drain on resources and social services, etc.  If they can prove that they own significant assets, can afford their own upkeep, and that they can integrate into society on a cultural level, I think that they should be able to stay -- but absolutely not otherwise.

Pariah state?  Do you think that China/Japan/Russia would care if Europe sent those cursed migrants back to where they came from -- or to internment camps?  The USA and Canada are the only places that might give a damn.  Even then, I'm not so sure.  Australia deports its "migrants" (so-called asylum seekers) to a Pacific island, and nobody hears much about it.

Conker

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3189
  • looks like you went for the overcooked potato look
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #72 on: January 27, 2016, 03:54:07 AM »
What's the average IQ in Syria?  Sub-Saharan Africa?  Do you think that it's not dysgenic to import people of such obviously poor stock?  Why do you think that their countries look the way they do?  What do you think Europe will look like, if they become a majority?

"millions of migrants in europe are affluent business and property owners"
Given that the population of Europe is barely 500M, this is an obvious lie.  The migrants are overwhelmingly poor, a drain on resources and social services, etc.  If they can prove that they own significant assets, can afford their own upkeep, and that they can integrate into society on a cultural level, I think that they should be able to stay -- but absolutely not otherwise.

Pariah state?  Do you think that China/Japan/Russia would care if Europe sent those cursed migrants back to where they came from -- or to internment camps?  The USA and Canada are the only places that might give a damn.  Even then, I'm not so sure.  Australia deports its "migrants" (so-called asylum seekers) to a Pacific island, and nobody hears much about it.



and therein lies the problem. you are detached from reality. there's apparently half a million migrant business owners in the UK alone. so pretty sure there are millions europe wide.

"Nearly half a million people from 155 countries have settled in the UK and launched businesses, the report by the Centre for Entrepreneurs and company data business, Duedil, has found. There are currently 456,073 migrant entrepreneurs in the UK running active companies, with some running more than one venture."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/businessclub/10676632/Migrant-entrepreneurs-driving-job-creation-across-Britain-study-shows.html

over a quarter of all doctors in the UK are migrants(largest contribution from indian subcontinent)...while the overall migrant population is only around 10% or so...only 1 in 3 doctors are white british.

it is nothing more than a far right perpetuated myth that "migrants are overwhelmingly poor, a drain on resources and social services", that has been dispelled dozens of times by numerous serious studies.

and if you think foreign investors won't "care" when you start repatriating foreign nationals and expropriating their assets, that's just further evidence you have no clue what you're talking about.

SuperTed

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6701
  • Rebirth
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #73 on: January 27, 2016, 04:25:06 AM »
of course people will not agree with every policy when voting for a party but if immigration was really as big an issue as some make out you would have thought anti immigration parties would have been more to the forefront over the years. with members capable of formulating a coherent range of policies other than as you say just having one policy.

that's the thing, for whatever reason the anti immigration parties generally tend to be run and followed by idiots, harping on about saving "the white race" and other such cr@p that turns the majority of normal people off. i suppose UKIP break the trend to some extent.

I definitely think immigration is a big issue for most people, especially now. It is often the number one topic on various political shows (such as QT and Newsnight). Governments often go against the will of the general public. Take the war in Iraq for instance – the vast majority of the population opposed it and we even saw the biggest ever demonstration against it; yet the government still went ahead with it. The same government also went on to comfortably win the following election too.
I think most people who vote, do so without really knowing what they’re voting for. Most Labour and Tory voters come from families who vote for these parties so everyone within the household votes the same way without questioning it. Politics is a bit like religion in that sense. :D

The FPTP voting system will always make it difficult for the more extreme parties to have any major impact in general elections but it's worth remembering that if proportional representation was used, than UKIP would have been a massive success in the last election.
I think most British people just trust the Conservatives when it comes to stricter border control and reducing immigration. The likes of Thatcher were certainly not fans of multiculturalism.

yeh you're probably right about people voting for stricter controls on immigration given a referendum but i doubt for the majority it would be on racial grounds.

I think there is a combination of several reasons as to why people want stricter controls on immigration. I do think it is partly racial since humans are naturally tribalistic and racialism is an aspect of tribalism. However, most British people are quite fair, seeing past skin colour and looking instead towards behaviour. If all migrants were hard working, grateful, law abiding and made efforts to integrate into the wider community, than I don’t think people would have an issue with them. The problems start once events like what happened in Cologne occur.

Stephano

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1356
Re: Europe: Restitution vs Tribunal vs Execution
« Reply #74 on: January 27, 2016, 05:49:44 AM »

and therein lies the problem. you are detached from reality. there's apparently half a million migrant business owners in the UK alone. so pretty sure there are millions europe wide.

"Nearly half a million people from 155 countries have settled in the UK and launched businesses, the report by the Centre for Entrepreneurs and company data business, Duedil, has found. There are currently 456,073 migrant entrepreneurs in the UK running active companies, with some running more than one venture."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/businessclub/10676632/Migrant-entrepreneurs-driving-job-creation-across-Britain-study-shows.html

over a quarter of all doctors in the UK are migrants(largest contribution from indian subcontinent)...while the overall migrant population is only around 10% or so...only 1 in 3 doctors are white british.

it is nothing more than a far right perpetuated myth that "migrants are overwhelmingly poor, a drain on resources and social services", that has been dispelled dozens of times by numerous serious studies.

and if you think foreign investors won't "care" when you start repatriating foreign nationals and expropriating their assets, that's just further evidence you have no clue what you're talking about.


You retarded, niggga? 

-I'm talking about the scum from Syria, Pakistan, and Sub-Saharan Africa that are pouring into Europe right now like a swarm of locusts.  (Hence the scare quotes around "migrants."  They're not migrants, they're invaders.) 

-You're talking about legal immigrants who landed many years ago.  (The guy in the article immigrated in 1972, for fuck's sake.)

I don't support much more immigration of any sort, and I think that Muslim communities that are hostile to their host population should be removed, but I have absolutely no issue with Indian doctors who immigrate legally.