Author Topic: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!  (Read 11406 times)

Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #25 on: January 27, 2016, 04:51:31 PM »
yeah? ::)



Lol, most dedicated troll on Getbig. Congrats.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #26 on: January 27, 2016, 07:05:13 PM »
It might take decades before someone supersedes this look...

yup. that was Ronnie 99, his all time best in many people's opinion.

257 but shreaded.
Flower Boy Ran Away

OB1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3222
  • "Happiness equals reality minus expectations."
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #27 on: January 27, 2016, 07:07:32 PM »
Lol, most dedicated troll on Getbig. Congrats.

x2
©

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15235
  • Rusty Trombone looks like an abortion in a thong
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #28 on: January 28, 2016, 01:07:15 AM »
Game OVER for Phil and Kai!!!



lol Nice try, troll. Just imagine how insane Phil would look like with a shitty, blurry 90s cam in semidarkness :D

SquidVicious

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2798
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #29 on: January 28, 2016, 01:50:41 AM »
lol Nice try, troll. Just imagine how insane Phil would look like with a shitty, blurry 90s cam in semidarkness :D
If you think Phil could ever hold a candle to Ronnie in that pose or in that photo you're a fucking moron.

Weedlejuice

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 629
  • Be the very best, like no one ever was.
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #30 on: January 28, 2016, 02:10:49 AM »
If you think Phil could ever hold a candle to Ronnie in that pose or in that photo you're a fucking moron.

This tbh, every bodybuilder of the 90's and those who saw him in person agree's.

phil could stand 2 body lengths infront of the line and ronnie would still dwarf him.

47 shredded lbs over phil on stage, do the math.

Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #31 on: January 28, 2016, 02:33:05 AM »
47 more shredded lbs over phil on stage, do the math.

Faxed.

DroppingPlates

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49987
  • Team Pocahontas
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #32 on: January 28, 2016, 04:06:34 AM »
lol Nice try, troll. Just imagine how insane Phil would look like with a shitty, blurry 90s cam in semidarkness :D

It amazes me that you dare to compare a man sans foundation with Ronnie. You're a consistent troll or borderline delusional, prob both..

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30287
  • Mentzer is Alive
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #33 on: January 28, 2016, 04:59:15 AM »
Affeman: prepare to be subjugated


Phil Heath could not beat Jay Cutler.... Jay owned Phil... until Jay turned 38 and tore his bicep. Then Phil FINALLY was able to barely beat Jay.

But...

Ronnie ROUTINELY beat Jay Cutler. Year after year.

Pet shop boys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11685
  • Getbig!
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #34 on: January 28, 2016, 05:15:05 AM »
Kevin wasnt close to Ronnie. Gunter should have been 2nd that year! All 2002 did was piss Ronnie off!!

Exactly, Levrone's torso was just inferior to Ronnie's .


WooSHHHHH

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #35 on: January 28, 2016, 10:25:36 AM »
lol Nice try, troll. Just imagine how insane Phil would look like with a shitty, blurry 90s cam in semidarkness :D

LOL ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SquatsRule

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3202
  • I am "teh sexy"
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #36 on: January 28, 2016, 01:03:47 PM »
Ronnie had bad gyno that year and his stomach was really distended. If Levrone's legs were better, he would have won.
S

bigmikecox

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14159
  • SAY MY NAME!!!!
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #37 on: January 28, 2016, 01:10:01 PM »
Heath is good, no doubt, but Ronnie was a different sort of creature!

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30287
  • Mentzer is Alive
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #38 on: January 30, 2016, 09:28:43 AM »
Ronnie had bad gyno that year and his stomach was really distended. If Levrone's legs were better, he would have won.

lol

IF Levrone's legs, back, and chest, were bigger....

bigkid

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2758
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #39 on: January 30, 2016, 09:53:59 AM »
Levrone was closer to winning in 2000 then he was 2002

Mothballs

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1672
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #40 on: January 30, 2016, 07:42:13 PM »
It might take decades before someone supersedes this look...

 2003 Coleman was the most impressive ever to stand on stage he was light years ahead of everybody. Like you said it might be 10-20 years before we see anything like that again. The only thing Kevin might have been better than Coleman was is POSING. That's about it. Coleman beats him in every thing else.

 Okay so Kevin had better triceps but at the end of the day he couldn't hold a candle to Coleman.

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #41 on: January 30, 2016, 08:01:05 PM »
Ronnie was way, way off this year, and Kevin was in great shape! Kevin's legs are way down by this point, and I think it cost him the show

Out of curiosity, how do you find the time to post on average 15 times a day on a bodybuilding site? Did you just wake up one day last year and say to yourself, I want to devote a good part of my day to being on getbig? This actually goes for all posters who literally live on here and have a higher post count than people who have been on here for a decade or more (like me).

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #42 on: January 30, 2016, 08:07:45 PM »
Except for 91 i never see levrone as a true contender for mr.o

You're right. Kevin shouldn't have even been in the top ten... ::) ::) ::) ::)


DroppingPlates

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49987
  • Team Pocahontas
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #43 on: January 31, 2016, 02:26:41 AM »
2003 Coleman was the most impressive ever to stand on stage he was light years ahead of everybody. Like you said it might be 10-20 years before we see anything like that again. The only thing Kevin might have been better than Coleman was is POSING. That's about it. Coleman beats him in every thing else.

 Okay so Kevin had better triceps but at the end of the day he couldn't hold a candle to Coleman.

Well said, yeah Kev had a sick pair of triceps

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #44 on: January 31, 2016, 05:02:41 AM »
When I see pics of Levrone I ask myself how was this guy not a Mr. O. But when he stands next to Ronnie, as with everybody else, he looks so small. Ronnie was just so damn big. So much pure muscle on that frame.


 

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22045
  • #EarlToo
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #45 on: January 31, 2016, 02:20:17 PM »
ronnie got LevrOWNED in 2002, everybody that saw the show live knew it and neither one was at their best

i don't care how "big" ronnie was in 2003 he looked like absolute shit and that was the final death blow to this sport, mr. o was no longer about having a body you would want it was about who looks the most like a chemical experiment gone wrong


E
E

ritch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10673
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #46 on: January 31, 2016, 04:36:48 PM »
There's no way in hell Levrone could beat Coleman but his free posing that year was a hell of a good routine. I've watched it countless times, he has rock star appeal but the show was never "Ronnie VS kevin"
?

Bevo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18724
  • Middle Urinal at Buc-ee’s
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #47 on: January 31, 2016, 06:02:05 PM »
ronnie got LevrOWNED in 2002, everybody that saw the show live knew it and neither one was at their best

i don't care how "big" ronnie was in 2003 he looked like absolute shit and that was the final death blow to this sport, mr. o was no longer about having a body you would want it was about who looks the most like a chemical experiment gone wrong


E


Levrone at his best vs Ronnie at his best Ronnie is better

Levrone has the physique more people strive for in terms of pro bbers

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #48 on: January 31, 2016, 06:26:41 PM »
ronnie got LevrOWNED in 2002, everybody that saw the show live knew it and neither one was at their best

i don't care how "big" ronnie was in 2003 he looked like absolute shit and that was the final death blow to this sport, mr. o was no longer about having a body you would want it was about who looks the most like a chemical experiment gone wrong


E

I think the time is long gone that the top bber is someone you would want to look like. That's why we have the physique class.

People are looking for freaks. Something not of this world. Someone that makes your jaw drop. Something that you point at, say Ramy's quads, and say "Look at that! How can that be? How can a leg be so huge?"

But it just goes to show how subjective this cult is. You think 2003 Ronnie looked like "absolute shit." I think it will be while before anyone can surpass that level of development.

Absolute shit?



ritch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10673
Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
« Reply #49 on: January 31, 2016, 06:48:17 PM »
Ronnie in 2003 is GOAT status, just insane.
To parrot what was said, it will be a hell of a long time until we see that again.
?