President Donald Trump just got attacked (sort of) on stage at Ohio rally

[Rami]

Security got there but I think Donald would have handled it himself as well.

Shit is getting real.

Second video:

With zoom and slow motion:

Alleged attacker! (new video)

May he rot in Guantanamo Bay regardless

[Rami]

He got some huge ass Caucasian bodyguards to clean up the mess

[MoralMan]

He needs Darren Avery as a bodyguard

[NickEdge779]

I really hope he takes proper precautions such as wearing a bullet proof vest. If he wins the GOP nomiation, I'm sure some mentally insane psycho with a gun will try to pull some shit.

[TheShape.]

You can't stop free speech, no matter how much you dislike what someone has to say.

[_aj_]

You can't stop free speech, no matter how much you dislike what someone has to say.

The left in this country have been successfully stifling free speech for decades. That's how they cling to power.

[Vince G, CSN MFT]

Man, they are coming from Trump...eventually he's going to get "touched"..

[_aj_]

Man, they are coming from Trump...eventually he's going to get "touched"..

If it's a Dindu that "touches" him. Let the race war begin.

[Hulkotron]

He needs Darren Avery as a bodyguard

DA would cut loose with a few corkscrew uppercuts and that would be all she wrote.

[Hulkotron]

The left in this country have been successfully stifling free speech for decades. That's how they cling to power.

Gotta get some more "safe spaces" in our universities oh brother

[_aj_]

So strange. The left keeps telling us that Trump is terrible for the republicans because he easily loses to Hillary or Bernie. Yet they seem so completely unhinged about him. If he was such a sure loser, they should just let him coast.

I find it all so puzzling 

[chaos]

So strange. The left keeps telling us that Trump is terrible for the republicans because he easily loses to Hillary or Bernie. Yet they seem so completely unhinged about him. If he was such a sure loser, they should just let him coast.

I find it all so puzzling 

Adonis will be along shortly to spell it out for you.

[WalterWhite]

So strange. The left keeps telling us that Trump is terrible for the republicans because he easily loses to Hillary or Bernie. Yet they seem so completely unhinged about him. If he was such a sure loser, they should just let him coast.

I find it all so puzzling 

When you have the whole oligarchy attacking you you know your in good shape! 

[SF1900]

DA would cut loose with a few corkscrew uppercuts and that would be all she wrote.

Darren Avey is not a man to be trifled with.

[_aj_]

Adonis will be along shortly to spell it out for you.

He will counter with another poll from either Talking Points Memo or the Sanders campaign.

[Tedim]

If it's a Dindu that "touches" him. Let the race war begin.

I'll make Andersonville look like a five star resort.....with better organization than the Germans, and more brutal than Cambodia

[_aj_]

I'll make Andersonville look like a five star resort.....with better organization than the Germans, and more brutal than Cambodia

You're hired. Submit a proposal by end of month.

[Svengoolie]

You can't stop free speech, no matter how much you dislike what someone has to say.

And yet they're always crying about conservatives and republicans being the Nazis. Members of the left like this guy today and those from last night are showing their evil. I don't care whether it's the grand Dragon of the kkk or Louis farrakan, the first amendment must be protected at all costs and those that try to use violence and intimidation to suppress that need to be dealt with.

Political party of peace, tolerance and nonviolence my fucking ass. I'm a Latino in my mid thirties and I'm disgusted and ashamed to be part of the same generation as this communist trash.

[chaos]

I'm a Latino in my mid thirties

Papeles por favor

[SF1900]

You can't stop free speech, no matter how much you dislike what someone has to say.

Interestingly enough, you can't stop free speech, but the government sure loves to regulate it where it can happen.

Remember when the religious nutjobs, The Westboro Baptist Church, were protesting soldiers funerals? Well, the government passed a law that any protesting of a soldiers funeral has to be 300 feet away. So, if you're protesting on public ground 250 feet away from a soldiers funeral, youre breaking the law, even though you're standing on public ground and exercising your right to free speech. Not only that, but they are controlling when you can exercise your right to free speech (60 minutes before or after the funeral). Why aren't the free speech proponents up in arms about the government regulating where someone can stand (on public ground) and when while exercising their right to free speech? For what its worth, I think its wrong what the Wesboro Baptist Church does. However, doesn't free speech entail the right to stand where you want on public ground and when, without being interfered by the government or law officials?  

The Respect for America’s Fallen Heroes Act (Pub.L. 109–228, 120 Stat. 387, enacted May 29, 2006) is an Act of Congress that prohibits protests within 300 feet (90 m) of the entrance of any cemetery under control of the National Cemetery Administration (a division of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs) from 60 minutes before to 60 minutes after a funeral. Penalties for violating the act are up to $100,000 in fines and up to one year imprisonment.

[chaos]

Interestingly enough, you can't stop free speech, but the government sure loves to regulate it where it can happen.

Remember when the religious nutjobs, The Westboro Baptist Church, were protesting soldiers funerals? Well, the government passed a law that any protesting of a soldiers funeral has to be 300 feet away. So, if you're protesting on public ground 250 feet away from a soldiers funeral, youre breaking the law, even though you're standing on public ground and exercising your right to free speech. Not only that, but they are controlling when you can exercise your right to free speech (60 minutes before or after the funeral). Why aren't the free speech proponents up in arms about the government regulating where someone can stand (on public ground) and when while exercising their right to free speech? For what its worth, I think its wrong what the Wesboro Baptist Church does. However, doesn't free speech entail the right to stand where you want on public ground without being interfered by the government or law officials?  

The Respect for America’s Fallen Heroes Act (Pub.L. 109–228, 120 Stat. 387, enacted May 29, 2006) is an Act of Congress that prohibits protests within 300 feet (90 m) of the entrance of any cemetery under control of the National Cemetery Administration (a division of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs) from 60 minutes before to 60 minutes after a funeral. Penalties for violating the act are up to $100,000 in fines and up to one year imprisonment.

300 ft from the entrance to the cemetary

[SF1900]

300 ft from the entrance to the cemetary

Okay, that may make a difference if the funeral is being held in a National Cemetery, if its considered private property. I don't know.

But similar laws have been passed for funeral protests in public funerals, which are open to the public. Public funeral spaces are open to the public. Its still buffering free speech and regulating where someone can and when they can protest on public ground. Further, they are telling people when they can protest (60 minutes before or after the funeral).

Either way, free speech is being regulated because of hurt feelings. I thought free speech didn't work that way.

The ACLU tried to counteract the legislation:

"The Safe Haven for Heroes Act of 2011" (H.R. 961) and "The Sanctity of Eternal Rest for Veterans" (SERVE) Act (S. 815) seek to protect the right of families to mourn in private. Unfortunately, both H.R. 961 and S. 815 seek to achieve that admirable goal by restricting the rights of protestors through the expansion of existing limitations on the time and place of protests in the vicinity of the funerals of fallen servicemembers.

Clearly, the ACLU intervened because what the government is doing is unconstitutional (telling people where and when they can protest).

But, hey, I may be completely wrong on the matter, but I assume the ACLU would not have stepped in, if they didn't think it was unconstitutional.

"It is the unpopular minority speech that is often the most vulnerable to censorship. Increasing the distance of protests from 300 feet to half a mile will not assuage the sense of loss felt by grieving families, but will do an injustice to the memory of the deceased servicemembers by limiting the civil liberties they enlisted to support and died defending. The First Amendment should not be limited to hinder WBC, but should be the rallying point for even more free speech in repudiation of WBC's hateful messages. The ACLU has profound sympathy for fallen servicemembers and their families, but does not approve of Congress using them as a means to limit free speech under the First Amendment." ACLU

[Rami]

Ok, Next rally in Cleveland is just about to start!

They better have some beefed up security from now on.

[_aj_]

Cincy is dindu-central. He will need some head smashers.

[Walter Sobchak]

George Soros funded MoveOn.Org hired agitators....

Thump their empty fucking skulls with a lead pipe