Morgan Aste - slightly big man..

[da_vinci]

Mental disease. No chicks like this. There's a fitness competitor that works at a local restaurant and she's always slobbering over me to "compete". The fuck. I am a twink by Getbig standards, but by IRL standards -- even from chicks in "the biz" -- I am stage ready.

BTW, for sure she wants the cock. She's even said that. So this is likely a come-on. But WTF?

Women like tall and athletic build. There's a category that like lots of muscles too, but not THIS kind of look anyway. This kind of look may be appealing to some other mentally ill men or weird homos.

[da_vinci]

At the same time you wouldn't announce it on an Internet forum.Ive yet to meet in the flesh, a sexually attractive to women male, who is married, that hasn't cheated at least once.Im going to take a guess you aren't the exception.

It would be foolish to admint anything like that in any case, esp. as his wife may read this. It takes a will of steel, that's for sure.

[falco]

Seen a video of him passing next to a friend of mine, who is 5.9" and 225ish pounds. The guy is a giant.

[SuperTed]

Let's face it, this guy doesn't look the way he does to appeal to women. I'm sure he knows full well that he's in a category that's above what's sexually attractive.
I imagine that he just loves the overall attention and stares that he gets - from everybody. And you can bet that he gets tons of attention wherever he goes. It's no different to someone like Kovacs. His whole identity is built around his freakish size and he wouldn't even want to leave his house if he lost some mass.

[njflex]

Let's face it, this guy doesn't look the way he does to appeal to women. I'm sure he knows full well that he's in a category that's above what's sexually attractive.
I imagine that he just loves the overall attention and stares that he gets - from everybody. And you can bet that he gets tons of attention wherever he goes. It's no different to someone like Kovacs. His whole identity is built around his freakish size and he wouldn't even want to leave his house if he lost some mass.

same as that polish bber waded through a crowded pool in vegas,,waiting for reactions.

[RagingBull]

Left arm seems to have nerve damage...see photo in reply #2.

As usual per these kind of guys, he shouldn't ever step on stage.


That said, he looks better than I expected.

[sync pulse]

There's a fitness competitor that works at a local restaurant and she's always slobbering over me to "compete". The fuck. I am a twink by Getbig standards, but by IRL standards -- even from chicks in "the biz" -- I am stage ready.
BTW, for sure she wants the cock. She's even said that. So this is likely a come-on. But WTF?

There is a sizeable minority of women who like muscles.  When they are alone with you, away from their friends.  When they feel comfortable that what they do won't be found out by their associates...It usually starts by them asking to "see your muscles"...

[falco]

There is yet to be born a woman that doesn't fid this pics apealling sexually.

[Taffin]

There is a sizeable minority of women who like muscles.  When they are alone with you, away from their friends.  When they feel comfortable that what they do won't be found out by their associates...It usually starts by them asking to "see your muscles"...

Anyone on here who has done even the slightest bit of door security/stripping knows this 'minority' is 'sizeable' indeed... maybe not Morgan Aste big (unless the dick-to-balls ratio is exceptional, right Rich?), but I believe _aj_'s story no problemo.

[SF1900]

I believe the MAJORITY of women will pick number 4 or number 5. Its the perfect balance between not having enough muscle, but having too much muscle.

1)


2)


3)


4)


5)


6)

[hench]

i dunno, most women would think 3 is muscular

I believe the MAJORITY of women will pick number 4 or number 5. Its the perfect balance between not having enough muscle, but having too much muscle.

1)


2)


3)


4)


5)


6)

[SF1900]

i dunno, most women would think 3 is muscular

Very true, but if they had a choice to pick a guy to date, I think they would go with 4 or 5.

[Waller]

Very true, but if they had a choice to pick a guy to date, I think they would go with 4 or 5.

[Army of One]

Its more like between 2 and 3, more like 2.3, been proved over and over if u find the womens magazine polls

[SF1900]

Its more like between 2 and 3, more like 2.3, been proved over and over if u find the womens magazine polls

I don't put too much stock into polls. In real life, I think most woman would pick 4 or 5.

Polls are inherently flawed. 4 or 5 would be the choice.

[Taffin]

As someone who peaked on the (newly inaugurated?) SF1900 scale at a solid 3.5 (ish) I have to point out that to get the girls in Ibiza I  never had to tickle wood like number 5 clearly is doing here 

[SF1900]

As someone who peaked on the (newly inaugurated?) SF1900 scale at a solid 3.5 (ish) I have to point out that to get the girls in Ibiza I  never had to tickle wood like number 5 clearly is doing here  

Well, youre a getbigger, so youre a special case.

I also redesigned income classification according to getbig standards. This classification scheme will be the new standards by which the Federal Government will place people into specific categories according to their income.

SF1900's classification scheme to describe socioeconomic status based on income per year. Data was collected from Getbig.com

1900, SF. (2015). An alternative classification scheme to describe socioeconomic status. Journal of Getbig.com, 14, 150-190.

>$99,000 - homeless

$100,000 - $450,000 = poor

$450,000 - $750,000 = low middle class

$750,000 - $1,000,000 - middle class

$1,000,000 - $5,000,0000 = upper middle class

$5,000,000 - $50,000,000 = rich

$50,000,000+ = super wealthy

[_aj_]

Its more like between 2 and 3, more like 2.3, been proved over and over if u find the womens magazine polls

Absolutely.

[Taffin]

Well, youre a getbigger, so youre a special case.

I also redesigned income classification according to getbig standards. This classification scheme will be the new standards by which the Federal Government will place people into specific categories according to their income.

SF1900's classification scheme to describe socioeconomic status based on income per year. Data was collected from Getbig.com

1900, SF. (2015). An alternative classification scheme to describe socioeconomic status. Journal of Getbig.com, 14, 150-190.

>$99,000 - homeless

$100,000 - $450,000 = poor

$450,000 - $750,000 = low middle class

$750,000 - $1,000,000 - middle class

$1,000,000 - $5,000,0000 = upper middle class

$5,000,000 - $50,000,000 = rich

$50,000,000+ = super wealthy

Sh1t! I'm poor! Nobody told me before... jeezus the humiliation. .. thx man 

[_aj_]

Sh1t! I'm poor! Nobody told me before... jeezus the humiliation. .. thx man 

Me too. I'm just trying to claw my way into the middle class, my brutha.

[SF1900]

Sh1t! I'm poor! Nobody told me before... jeezus the humiliation. .. thx man 

That is okay. Getbiggers always strive to reach a higher standard of excellence.

[Taffin]

Me too. I'm just trying to claw my way into the middle class, my brutha.

That is okay. Getbiggers always strive to reach a higher standard of excellence.

Gotta log off GB for a while now guys and try to find me a Saturday job... *sigh*

[SF1900]

Gotta log off GB for a while now guys and try to find me a Saturday job... *sigh*

Work at a local Planet Fitness. Supplement your income.

[DroppingPlates]

Work at a local Planet Fitness. Supplement your income.

I would rather work in a crossfit gym

[SF1900]

I would rather work in a crossfit gym

Money is money, no matter where it comes from (from an honest establishment).