Yearbook flasher charged with indecent exposure

[SF1900]

He has to wear an electronic device, as ordered by the judge. He is being charged with 69 accounts of indecent exposure. I assume if he is found guilty, he may have to register as a sexual offender. This one joke may screw the rest of his life.  

http://www.kristv.com/story/31876695/yearbook-flasher-charged-with-indecent-exposure?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook_KRIS_6_News

ARIZONA -

(KPNX) At first glance, it looks like a typical varsity football yearbook photo: Mesa, Arizona's Red Mountain High School players posing side-by-side with senior Hunter Osborn blending in with the crowd.

That is, until the school released the yearbooks to students, who noticed something school staff and yearbook editors had apparently hadn't: Osborn was exposing himself.

Court documents state that Osborn "exposed his penis through the top of his waistband of his football uniform."

Once school leaders found out, they notified Mesa Police and Osborn was charged with one count of furnishing harmful items to minors -- which is a felony -- and 69 counts of indecent exposure, one for every person who was there when the picture was taken.

A total of 250 pre-order yearbooks went out before anyone caught the photo.

The picture is also in a football program that was sold at games.

[kreator]

what a prick 

[SF1900]

what a prick 

[HTexan]

A little much for the tip of a penis.

[Tha Grim Lifter]

The world is pussyfied now. Guys can get in trouble for anything. What a joke.

[Army of One]

Clearly lost his head

[SF1900]

The world is pussyfied now. Guys can get in trouble for anything. What a joke.

A guy shouldn't get in trouble for exposing his genitals? Should we just be allowed to go around and flash people?

Cases like this can become a slippery slope. If it was okay for him to do this, when and where does it cross the line to where its illegal and inappropriate? Thus, they keep the law constant across all cases--don't expose yourself. Case closed. The stringent nature of this law does not allow people to find legal loopholes in the law, i.e., well, this person exposed himself and didn't get in trouble, so how is my case much different? Why can't I do it?

[Tha Grim Lifter]

A guy shouldn't get in trouble for exposing his genitals? Should we just be allowed to go around and flash people?

Cases like this can become a slippery slope. If it was okay for him to do this, when and where does it cross the line to where its illegal and inappropriate? Thus, they keep the law constant across all cases--don't expose yourself. Case closed. The stringent nature of this law does not allow people to find legal loopholes in the law, i.e., well, this person exposed himself and didn't get in trouble, so how is my case much different? Why can't I do it?

It's true he shouldn't do it but would have he got this punishment 30 years ago?

It's a crime to have a penis nowadays.

[Marty Champions]

A guy shouldn't get in trouble for exposing his genitals? Should we just be allowed to go around and flash people?

Cases like this can become a slippery slope. If it was okay for him to do this, when and where does it cross the line to where its illegal and inappropriate? Thus, they keep the law constant across all cases--don't expose yourself. Case closed. The stringent nature of this law does not allow people to find legal loopholes in the law, i.e., well, this person exposed himself and didn't get in trouble, so how is my case much different? Why can't I do it?

[Army of One]

You know what they say, when in doubt, use the White towel

[SF1900]

It's true he shouldn't do it but would have he got this punishment 30 years ago?

It's a crime to have a penis nowadays.

Well, no, he would not have gotten this punishment 30 years ago. Though, I am not too sure what that has to do with anything. Laws are not static. Laws change according to the times. I'd have to look into the research, but perhaps sexually deviant behavior has risen over the years; furthermore, such behaviors are taken a lot more seriously these days. 30+ years ago, we didn't know as much as we did about this type of behavior. As such, laws often change depending on what we learn and its affect on others.

Now, I don't think this guy is displaying true sexual deviancy. However, as I stated previously, they keep the law constant across all cases, in order to avoid any legal loopholes. If you let one person get away with it, then who else should be allowed to expose their genitals? And where? It then becomes a slippery slope, and I am assuming that is not something the law wants to deal with.

As for your statement, "its a crime to have a penis nowadays." Really? I've never been arrested on any sexual behaviors. Have you? I've never been convicted of a crime because "I have a penis." Seems like you just want to make an excuse for a man to expose himself. Hmmmmm, interesting. Tell me more about that.................... ...................

[Tha Grim Lifter]

He's being attacked more because he's a man.

Stop defending feminism, I can't believe it's got to you. You're one of them now.

[SF1900]

He's being attacked more because he's a man.

Stop defending feminism, I can't believe it's got to you. You're one of them now.

lol. Wow, what a retort,  Defending feminism? No. I just have no desire to see another man expose himself. The funny thing is, the women who sexually abuse young children, receive the same time as men who molest young children. Just look at all the teacher who have sex with underage students. They are vilified.

Maybe you do.

[HTexan]

A guy shouldn't get in trouble for exposing his genitals? Should we just be allowed to go around and flash people?

Cases like this can become a slippery slope. If it was okay for him to do this, when and where does it cross the line to where its illegal and inappropriate? Thus, they keep the law constant across all cases--don't expose yourself. Case closed. The stringent nature of this law does not allow people to find legal loopholes in the law, i.e., well, this person exposed himself and didn't get in trouble, so how is my case much different? Why can't I do it?

The punishment here doesn't fit the crime.

[Army of One]

13 posts and no picture of the cock?

[SF1900]

The punishment here doesn't fit the crime.

Did you see what I said above? They most likely keep the laws constant so lawyers and others can't find loopholes. When it comes to stuff like this, it becomes a slippery slope if you let one person get away with it. Then people will ask, "Are there are other contexts where I can expose myself and not get into that  much trouble?"

[oldtimer1]

Just a dopey kid pulling a prank.  If he is under 18 then the judge in most jurisdictions has wide latitude. He might drop the charges and basically slap him on the prick I mean wrist.  Then the charges will be sealed if he stays out of trouble. If he is 18 then he has in for a world of hurt if the judge and prosecutor doesn't go easy on him.

[HTexan]

Did you see what I said above? They most likely keep the laws constant so lawyers and others can't find loopholes. When it comes to stuff like this, it becomes a slippery slope if you let one person get away with it. Then people will ask, "Are there are other contexts where I can expose myself and not get into that  much trouble?"

So dude showed the tip of his little peepee. You think he deserves prison time and to be a sex offender for life?

[Nails]

 

[TuHolmes]

It seems to be over-reaction, but what is up with kids today? So many of them doing stupid fucking shit.

I have to ask everyone here... Would you have done something like this as a teen? I highly doubt I was going to whip my dick out... Now, I did know a moron who pulled his nut sack out when we were in class one day and started tugging on his chewing gum, which I thought was fucking moronic and low brow. I remember having to tell him that no one wanted to see his sack and to put it back in his fucking shorts.

This kid was just a complete idiot. Should be be on a sex offender list? No, but goddam he's a fucking moron.

[SF1900]

So dude showed the tip of his little peepee. You think he deserves prison time and to be a sex offender for life?

Its a tricky question. I do not think he is a sexual offender. However, I can see why the law would want to treat all cases like this in an equal manner.

So, I guess there is my subjective interpretation of the situation, and how I am conceptualizing it purely from a legal perspective.

[240 is Back]

there were 2 kids in my high school (st v-m) who kept showing off their junk.  Just whipping it out in PE.  Came from broken homes.

you know who you are.  It was 1991, gym class.  The two of you kept showing your junk off at the weight room, down the hill, to the field house, to anyone who would look.

What the F was wrong with you?   Class of 94, ST V-M, you know who you are.  You know the 2 boys that kept doing it.  Was not cool, and 25 years later, you're still a shitty person for showing your junk to others.   Any alum in that class will know precisely who i'm talking about.

[Nails]

sounds like the school distributed child porn

[chaos]

It seems to be over-reaction, but what is up with kids today? So many of them doing stupid fucking shit.

I have to ask everyone here... Would you have done something like this as a teen? I highly doubt I was going to whip my dick out... Now, I did know a moron who pulled his nut sack out when we were in class one day and started tugging on his chewing gum, which I thought was fucking moronic and low brow. I remember having to tell him that no one wanted to see his sack and to put it back in his fucking shorts.

This kid was just a complete idiot. Should be be on a sex offender list? No, but goddam he's a fucking moron.

This. Dude is obviously an idiot, his life is going to be hard enough without being on the sex offender list.

[HTexan]

there were 2 kids in my high school (st v-m) who kept showing off their junk.  Just whipping it out in PE.  Came from broken homes.

you know who you are.  It was 1991, gym class.  The two of you kept showing your junk off at the weight room, down the hill, to the field house, to anyone who would look.

What the F was wrong with you?   Class of 94, ST V-M, you know who you are.  You know the 2 boys that kept doing it.  Was not cool, and 25 years later, you're still a shitty person for showing your junk to others.   Any alum in that class will know precisely who i'm talking about.

I think every pe class has that guy or guys. You know, sexually confused or socially retarded. There was this one guy is my class that would show people his dick and tell them to "suck it, you f**". Which I find very ironic, being that you're showing straight guys your dick and making sexual statements at them.

This other dude in other pe class would walk around naked and roll deodorant on his balls. If anyone said anything about it, if would call them "fa*****" because the only way, he thought, that people would know about it is because they would looks at his balls and he wild want to fight them.