Let's stop there. OBVIOUSLY, none of us has anything "tangible" to back up any CT,
Not true, CTs have been exposed before. and (what i bolded) is why i don't usually insult you and typically read your theories and predictions with an open mind; for lots of other reasons too. (however, truthers act as if they do, which makes them targets for ridicule IMO)
Your "some in govt let it happen" is just as much of a theory as "controlled demolition" - it's just that, a theory, with no proof.
First nearly sensible thing you have said all day.
You're moving the argument from "I believe in a lesser version of inside job"
Wrong. Its not a greater or lesser version. Its 2 different things. (
distinctions) A lesser 9/11 truther CT would be Rumsfeld let the plane hit the pentagon when he could have ordered it shot down but the WTC !-2 were demolished. Or everything happened as reported but flight 93 was shot down.
into the very sketchy "proof vs supposition vs theories".
Wrong again. (paste here all the things i said about CT'er arguments)
I cannot blame you, cause I kinda nailed ya with my position, and there wasn't much for you to argue.
Not much is needed to argue. A classic truther is whacked. (go back to my distinctions, they won't go away no matter how much you want them to)
You want to make it so tilfoil hatter doesn't equal you. It doesn't because of the distinctions i bought up. (paste here all the things i said about CT'er arguments)
But it does. It absolutely does.
doesn't matter how many times you say it. The distinctions still exist.
I've read your 911 beliefs and arguments for a decade, man, and I"ve read and watched so many things over the years. I have the tarpley books, the 911 omission, etc. I have a freakin history degree too lol, false flags are very common in history, and you know that.
You are suggesting a logical fallacy, that because false flag operations have existed in the past that 9/11 could exist. It only will exist if there is evidence that backs up that loony grand conspiracy theory and there is none.
I know you man. You're freakin scared shitless to be a nutter, who can be labeled a truther, a wingnut, a tinfil hatter.
ROTFLMAO
The only people who could make that mistake are CT'ers trying to bring some credibility to there side by making me one of them. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAH
So you, and many like you, fall into this ambigious category with "well, maybe a few hundred govt or military people did know, and LET it happen, but that's not the same."
And its
not the same as (paste here all the things i said about CT'er arguments)
Sorry, but it is.
Sorry you can't tell the difference between: (paste here all the things i said about CT'er arguments and what i said about my suspicions)
They're co-conspirators if their job is to stop attacks and they know, and they allow one. They're just as bad as the 19 idiots with "boxcutters".... and their role on that day was just as important.
Idiots huh? Would say on the level of 19 goat Shepard or would say over half who attended college, 1 or more on a scholarship, a few with degrees?
You want to agree we've been lied to.
It has nothing to do with what i want. Its what is or what isn't NOT (paste here all the things i said about CT'er arguments)
You openly agree foreknowledge and LIHOP on govt/mil officials parts.
Wrong i openly suspect with the understanding that i have nothing to back it up with.
But then you have insulting names for people who believe it goes beyond that.
Again i have insulting things to say about them because (paste here all the things i said about CT'er arguments)
You don't believe in santa, but you are mocking those who don't believe in the easter bunny, bro 
In your analogy here the people who believe in the Easter bunny are saying (paste here all the things i said about CT'er arguments) and i am saying (paste everything i said about my suspicions here)
LOL
