Gun attack on Florida gay club.

[FREAKgeek]

Full statement.
Last night, our nation was attacked by a radical Islamic terrorist. It was the worst terrorist attack on our soil since 9/11, and the second of its kind in 6 months. My deepest sympathy and support goes out to the victims, the wounded, and their families.

In his remarks today, President Obama disgracefully refused to even say the words 'Radical Islam'. For that reason alone, he should step down. If Hillary Clinton, after this attack, still cannot say the two words 'Radical Islam' she should get out of this race for the Presidency.

If we do not get tough and smart real fast, we are not going to have a country anymore. Because our leaders are weak, I said this was going to happen – and it is only going to get worse. I am trying to save lives and prevent the next terrorist attack. We can't afford to be politically correct anymore.

I agree, this anti Islamophobia is being taken too far. And when was the last time you heard "western-phobia"? Muslims are totally exempt from this lol.

[polychronopolous]

Even if Trump did tweet that, he's right. Fuck Islamic Arabic extremists.... They suck.
I wish Hilarious and Obama Bin Laden would tweet the same thing.

Pussy world...

Grow some farking balls...

but crusades

[TheShape.]

He is right though.

But...but he's big meanie head!  Give me a break.

[TuHolmes]

But...but he's big meanie head!  Give me a break.

Actually. It's indicative of his ego more so than any correct thing.

This is the same person who said we have to let Syrians in as well.

Like it or not, the US is not a nation that starts building lists because we don't like someone's religion.

[Las Vegas]

Too bad the guy wasn't suspected of selling gear.  He'd have never been let out of their clutches and they'd have an eye on him at all times.  They'd know exactly where he put the guns he'd just bought and they would be prepared to jump him at any moment.

[Las Vegas]

^ All true, btw.

[Conker]

Sandy Hook? was a gun control failure? How so? AR15's were " banned " in Connecticut ( still are ) at the time and that lunatic killed his mother and stole her firearms , so which " new " law would have prevented this? 

He pledged allegiance to ISAL thanks for playing though.  ISAL is taking credit  he was exercising his Constitutional right to own firearms NOT murder people with them.

This will happen again almost did in Cali at Gay Pride , and the lunatic who shot up a church shouldn't have been able to purchase a gun , thank the FBI for letting that one slide and again , same with Sandy Hook , he killed his mother and stole her guns , so again explain what new laws would have prevented this? NONE

You're all for confiscation , it's not an answer it's not realistic and it only creates more violence. Anymore bright ideas? 

you are a good guy, but you are so far in denial (like most of the pro gun supporters) that's it's just pointless even trying to argue this with you. this is why i pity the rational people in the US that can see the obvious and have to endure these arguments.

it's like if there was a boulder in your doorway stopping you get into your house but instead of you accepting the obvious problem "the boulder" and the obvious solution "move the boulder". the gun nuts are going to come up with any amount of intricate arguments and excuses as to why moving the boulder is not the solution.

[Las Vegas]

you are a good guy, but you are so far in denial (like most of the pro gun supporters) that's it's just pointless even trying to argue this with you. this is why i pity the rational people in the US that can see the obvious and have to endure these arguments.

it's like if there was a boulder in your doorway stopping you get into your house but instead of you accepting the obvious problem "the boulder" and the obvious solution "move the boulder". the gun nuts are going to come up with any amount of intricate arguments and excuses as to why moving the boulder is not the solution.

Do you deny that a shooting like this, isn't the full story behind guns?

[mr.turbo]

Sandy Hook? was a gun control failure? How so? AR15's were " banned " in Connecticut ( still are ) at the time and that lunatic killed his mother and stole her firearms , so which " new " law would have prevented this? 

He pledged allegiance to ISAL thanks for playing though.  ISAL is taking credit  he was exercising his Constitutional right to own firearms NOT murder people with them.

This will happen again almost did in Cali at Gay Pride , and the lunatic who shot up a church shouldn't have been able to purchase a gun , thank the FBI for letting that one slide and again , same with Sandy Hook , he killed his mother and stole her guns , so again explain what new laws would have prevented this? NONE

You're all for confiscation , it's not an answer it's not realistic and it only creates more violence. Anymore bright ideas? 

you sir don't seem to have the best judgement in this regard.

I recommend tuning in any firearms you may presently own, to the nearest police authority.

I'm the gun expert around here so I suggest you heed this advice.

[Las Vegas]

ND making some great points, though.  No denying it.

[TheShape.]

Actually. It's indicative of his ego more so than any correct thing.

This is the same person who said we have to let Syrians in as well.

Like it or not, the US is not a nation that starts building lists because we don't like someone's religion.

A religion that is incompatible with our constitution. We do not kill gays here or abuse women. If they want to do that they can go right back where that's accepted.

[Kwon]

but crusades

Where the Crusades at homie

[NarcissisticDeity]

you are a good guy, but you are so far in denial (like most of the pro gun supporters) that's it's just pointless even trying to argue this with you. this is why i pity the rational people in the US that can see the obvious and have to endure these arguments.

it's like if there was a boulder in your doorway stopping you get into your house but instead of you accepting the obvious problem "the boulder" and the obvious solution "move the boulder". the gun nuts are going to come up with any amount of intricate arguments and excuses as to why moving the boulder is not the solution.

Insults aren't solutions. Your " solution " ( confiscation ) isn't a solution.

Bad guy murders a bunch of people with a gun , lets punish YOU who never did anything wrong. Makes sense to you? 

Guns enable people to defend themselves at the low estimate 400K per year as as high as 2 million people per year , Some guy kills 50 people in a club , your solution lets take away the ability of up to 2 million people to defend themselves. Sound logic. 
 

[Las Vegas]

Insults aren't solutions. Your " solution " ( confiscation ) isn't a solution.

Bad guy murders a bunch of people with a gun , lets punish YOU who never did anything wrong. Makes sense to you? 

Guns enable people to defend themselves at the low estimate 400K per year as as high as 2 million people per year , Some guy kills 50 people in a club , your solution lets take away the ability of up to 2 million people to defend themselves. Sound logic. 
 

Exactly right.  No one can say otherwise.

None of this would be an issue, if it weren't for guys like Obama and the asses running the media.  I really can't believe people fall for that shit.

[polychronopolous]

Where the Crusades at homie

In the minds of mentally ill liberals every time something like this pops off.

[Kwon]

In the minds of mentally ill liberals every time something like this pops off.

We need more Crusades brah

[cart@@n]

[polychronopolous]

We need more Crusades brah

Yup

[Board_SHERIF]

nowt care...

[Fortress]

I don't see where the religion matters personally.

It matters because it highlights some irrefutable truths.

Islam is incompatible with western ideals.

When you import individuals from majority-Muslim nations, you import Islamic culture (and consequently, many who adhere/will come to adhere, strictly, to the Islamic faith, therefore growing to hate a land and its ways/values that are contrary to what's commanded in the Qu'ran).   

Islam is unique in that its how-to manual does not present its content as being cultivated through the influence of "god", but rather, THE direct word of "god". Not to be altered, strayed from, etc. As well, it has a ready-made, "god"-made political/legal system at its core (Sharia).

To view the photos a few pages back of gay people marching with signs declaring support for Islam and its followers is the height of ignorance and/or delusion.

Islam states very clearly its hatred for homosexuality. That some "Muslims" suggest otherwise doesn't alter facts. These in-name-only Muslims do not represent Islam's truth.

Islam is a virus that at its core commands the true faithful to spread it almost exactly as a ... virus ... does.

We've already allowed the virus in. However, we can fight it on home turf while limiting further infection through irresponsible immigration from Muslim countries.

The truth hurts. It's uncomfortable. It is politically incorrect.

It doesn't fit with the multicultural peace, love and harmony narrative radical (a.k.a. brainwashed) liberals cling to.

Arabic culture and Islam will never be our friend. To the contrary, it is our enemy.

We cannot tolerate it.

[Coach is Back!]

Then there's this...

[MCWAY]

Anybody else notice that our beloved president only called this attack against homosexuals a "hate crime". I don't recall his doing that for the victims in Chattanooga, San Bernadino, or Paris.

[Las Vegas]

Just noticed on the national news, they did a very long close-up of a guy appearing to cry his eyes out over the situation (and I mean it was close, extended, and clearly intended to be taken personally).

Exactly what is the purpose of that, and how is it supposed to pass for news?

[Las Vegas]

Anybody else notice that our beloved president only called this attack against homosexuals a "hate crime". I don't recall his doing that for the victims in Chattanooga, San Bernadino, or Paris.

Great point.

[Slapper]

Stay classy, trump.

What is he supposed to fucking say?! Told you so?!
 
Guy tells you exactly what he's going to do with Radical Islam and he's labelled as a radical himself!

If you think someone who is willing to kill himself over two verses of a shit book is going to want to "talk it out," be my fucking guest.

I, on the other hand, welcome people like Trump who say what will happen if this shit keeps going on.