Author Topic: Ban the AR-15 from Civilian Ownership :-O (Read 38558 times)

SF1900 · « **on:** June 13, 2016, 05:36:55 PM »

A petition already has been started.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/ban-ar-15-civilian-ownership

Guns in America is a complicated issue for many reasons. However, the AR-15 is the weapon of choice for Domestic Terrorists and others who wish to kill and harm people quickly and efficiently. It serves no other purpose other than to accomplish this. Banning this gun will show that we can act on this issue. It will have symbolic weight while also making one small step forward on dealing with this epidemic.

________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ _____

http://www.salon.com/2016/06/13/nobody_needs_an_ar_15_the_orlando_massacre_teaches_us_again_that_we_must_ban_semi_automatic_human_killing_machines/

Nobody needs an AR-15: The Orlando massacre teaches us (again) that we must ban semi-automatic human killing machines. Do it now: Congress must ban military-style weapons and make it harder for terrorists to act on their hate

We’ve had yet another horrific mass shooting. In fact, it’s the worst mass shooting in American history. More than fifty people were killed and many more wounded in a nightclub that catered to gay people in Orlando Florida. At the moment I’m writing this, what we know is that these murders were carried out by an American Muslim by the name of Omar Mateen, the son of Afghan immigrants who was born in New York 29 years ago. We know that he called 911 during the killing and reportedly pledged allegiance to ISIS and mentioned the Tsarnaev brothers (who were not ISIS, for what it’s worth). We know the FBI had been aware of some radical connections and jihadist “leanings” and had interviewed him in the past. His father reported that he was an angry homophobe. His ex-wife said he was a violent domestic abuser who was mentally unstable. He was a hate-filled, violent piece of work.

HTexan · « **Reply #1 on:** June 13, 2016, 05:41:14 PM »

As a gun owner, I believe stricter gun laws are needed. But this is stupid. So cars kill a shit load of people. Are we banning those now too ?

blinky · « **Reply #2 on:** June 13, 2016, 05:41:42 PM »

its a start.
But seriously you guys(Americans) need to get over the whole "right to bear arms" shit. Stop thinking about protecting urself and worry about protecting your fellow Americans.
Yup, you have the right to own guns and protect urself. How's that working out for you as Nation??

blinky · « **Reply #3 on:** June 13, 2016, 05:42:53 PM »

Quote from: HTexan on June 13, 2016, 05:41:14 PM

As a gun owner, I believe stricter gun laws are needed. But this is stupid. So cars kill a shit load of people. Are we banning those now too ?

ur kidding right?

do people go and buy a car with the intent of killing as many people as they can with it? smh

HTexan · « **Reply #4 on:** June 13, 2016, 05:44:21 PM »

Quote from: blinky on June 13, 2016, 05:42:53 PM

ur kidding right?
do people go and buy a car with the intent of killing as many people as they can with it? smh

People buy bats and hammers with the intent to kill, are you saying we should ban sporting goods and hand tools too?

chaos · « **Reply #5 on:** June 13, 2016, 05:45:38 PM »

Quote from: blinky on June 13, 2016, 05:41:42 PM

its a start.
But seriously you guys(Americans) need to get over the whole "right to bear arms" shit. Stop thinking about protecting urself and worry about protecting your fellow Americans.
Yup, you have the right to own guns and protect urself. How's that working out for you as Nation??

Stick to posting naked sluts, your worded posts are horrible.

blinky · « **Reply #6 on:** June 13, 2016, 05:46:43 PM »

Quote from: chaos on June 13, 2016, 05:45:38 PM

Stick to posting naked sluts, your worded posts are horrible.

cant handle the truth hey

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #7 on:** June 13, 2016, 05:48:18 PM »

They were " banned " already ( Thanks ASSHOLE Clinton ) 1994-2004 and it has ZERO impact on crime and violence.

I live in Massachusetts and we are currently in an " Assault Weapons Ban " so a national one ( again ) would mean shit to me, However the deluded masses are under the assumption that these rifles were banned from being owned and possessed , which they NEVER were.

They are used in the smallest proportion of gun murders and more people are killed using hands & feet than ALL rifles including the AR15 subset. Entertaining they could ban the complete manufacturer , transfer and sale of these types of rifles it would have ZERO impact on gun violence and you know what would happen? They would move to next ban semi-automatic pistols

This is about slowly infringing on people's rights. I will keep posting this and showing how ignorant antis are.

3 out of the 4 completed rifles in this pictures are in a " Assault Weapons Ban " configuration. Can you tell which ones are? And how would another Assault Weapons Ban prevent what happened? I'm still waiting.

FYI the time of Sandy Hook the state of Connecticut had a " Assault Weapons Ban " tell me again how these " bans " save lives?

calfzilla · « **Reply #8 on:** June 13, 2016, 05:51:18 PM »

Where is aj to speak on this?

blinky · « **Reply #9 on:** June 13, 2016, 05:52:01 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on June 13, 2016, 05:48:18 PM

They were " banned " already ( Thanks ASSHOLE Clinton ) 1994-2004 and it has ZERO impact on crime and violence.

I live in Massachusetts and we are currently in an " Assault Weapons Ban " so a national one ( again ) would mean shit to me, However the deluded masses are under the assumption that these rifles were banned from being owned and possessed , which they NEVER were.

They are used in the smallest proportion of gun murders and more people are killed using hands & feet than ALL rifles including the AR15 subset. Entertaining they could ban the complete manufacturer , transfer and sale of these types of rifles it would have ZERO impact on gun violence and you know what would happen? They would move to next ban semi-automatic pistols

This is about slowly infringing on people's rights. I will keep posting this and showing how ignorant antis are.

3 out of the 4 completed rifles in this pictures are in a " Assault Weapons Ban " configuration. Can you tell which ones are? And how would another Assault Weapons Ban prevent what happened? I'm still waiting.

FYI the time of Sandy Hook the state of Connecticut had a " Assault Weapons Ban " tell me again how these " bans " save lives?

compare the US to countries that have actual gun laws and regulations. Your murders ans mass killing are off the charts in comparison.

Nails · « **Reply #10 on:** June 13, 2016, 05:52:54 PM »

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11 on:** June 13, 2016, 05:54:15 PM »

Quote from: blinky on June 13, 2016, 05:52:01 PM

compare the US to countries that have actual gun laws and regulations. Your murders ans mass killing are off the charts in comparison.

That doesn't answer my questions

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #12 on:** June 13, 2016, 05:57:39 PM »

Reality gun ownership is at an all-time high and violent crimes keeps falling.

blinky · « **Reply #13 on:** June 13, 2016, 05:58:34 PM »

Quote from: blinky on June 13, 2016, 05:52:01 PM

compare the US to countries that have actual gun laws and regulations. Your murders ans mass killing are off the charts in comparison.

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on June 13, 2016, 05:48:18 PM

They were " banned " already ( Thanks ASSHOLE Clinton ) 1994-2004 and it has ZERO impact on crime and violence.

I live in Massachusetts and we are currently in an " Assault Weapons Ban " so a national one ( again ) would mean shit to me, However the deluded masses are under the assumption that these rifles were banned from being owned and possessed , which they NEVER were.

They are used in the smallest proportion of gun murders and more people are killed using hands & feet than ALL rifles including the AR15 subset. Entertaining they could ban the complete manufacturer , transfer and sale of these types of rifles it would have ZERO impact on gun violence and you know what would happen? They would move to next ban semi-automatic pistols

This is about slowly infringing on people's rights. I will keep posting this and showing how ignorant antis are.

3 out of the 4 completed rifles in this pictures are in a " Assault Weapons Ban " configuration. Can you tell which ones are? And how would another Assault Weapons Ban prevent what happened? I'm still waiting.

FYI the time of Sandy Hook the state of Connecticut had a " Assault Weapons Ban " tell me again how these " bans " save lives?

so you think "your rights(sane normal people)" are more important than protecting your country as a whole???

blinky · « **Reply #14 on:** June 13, 2016, 05:59:23 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on June 13, 2016, 05:57:39 PM

Reality gun ownership is at an all-time high and violent crimes keeps falling.

but mass shooting are continuing and increasing

calfzilla · « **Reply #15 on:** June 13, 2016, 06:00:56 PM »

Seems to make more sense to ban gun free zones. That's where all the mass shootings are. Easy pickins.

cart@@n · « **Reply #16 on:** June 13, 2016, 06:01:00 PM »

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #17 on:** June 13, 2016, 06:02:10 PM »

Quote from: blinky on June 13, 2016, 05:58:34 PM

so you think "your rights(sane normal people)" are more important than protecting your country as a whole???

What does that even mean? Protecting my country as a whole?

I'm reasonable but we know for a FACT already an " Assault Weapons Ban " did absolutely NOTHING to prevent violence. And 3 out of 4 of my rifles are in a AWB configuration AGAIN how would this have prevented any mass shooting?

blinky · « **Reply #18 on:** June 13, 2016, 06:02:44 PM »

Quote from: calfzilla on June 13, 2016, 06:00:56 PM

Seems to make more sense to ban gun free zones. That's where all the mass shootings are. Easy pickins.

i have no clue which states have what laws....but really??

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #19 on:** June 13, 2016, 06:04:54 PM »

Quote from: blinky on June 13, 2016, 05:59:23 PM

but mass shooting are continuing and increasing

A red herring , the vast majority of gun violence is perpetrated with pistols , why? easily concealable. More people are killed every year with hands & feet than ALL rifles. Ban hands & feet , it's for the kids

polychronopolous · « **Reply #20 on:** June 13, 2016, 06:05:23 PM »

Quote from: blinky on June 13, 2016, 06:02:44 PM

i have no clue which states have what laws....but really??

You sound like a guy trying to discuss a subject he knows very little about.

chaos · « **Reply #21 on:** June 13, 2016, 06:06:10 PM »

Quote from: blinky on June 13, 2016, 06:02:44 PM

i have no clue which states have what laws....but really??

Then why put your 2 cents in on something you know nothing about? Watching too much tv and believing what the media reports will rot your brain, moreso than porn!

BTW, yes really.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #22 on:** June 13, 2016, 06:07:38 PM »

Quote from: polychronopolous on June 13, 2016, 06:05:23 PM

You sound like a guy trying to discuss a subject he knows very little about.

BINGO !! Everyone has an opinion and 99% of them are totally ignorant on the subject. But they know " something " has to be done. So fuck facts , appeals to emotion are more important

timfogarty · « **Reply #23 on:** June 13, 2016, 06:08:31 PM »

Quote from: HTexan on June 13, 2016, 05:41:14 PM

As a gun owner, I believe stricter gun laws are needed. But this is stupid. So cars kill a shit load of people. Are we banning those now too ?

Cars are well regulated, require safety features. Operators are required to pass tests, have liability insurance. Let's do the same for guns.

chaos · « **Reply #24 on:** June 13, 2016, 06:10:14 PM »

Quote from: timfogarty on June 13, 2016, 06:08:31 PM

Cars are well regulated, require safety features. Operators are required to pass tests, have liability insurance. Let's do the same for guns.

Should also license gays, have them tested and insured to make sure they don't pass on any infectious, harmful diseases.