Trump praises saddam

[240 is Back]

Does he really lack common sense this badly?  Or just trying to lose?

A week before the convention, and he's being criticized by both parties for praising saddam terrorist fighting tactics. 

He cannot really be this stupid and thick, can he?

[Victor VonDoom]

Remember, you are talking about a man who has never run for office before, has no political experience, and no experience with public service.  Bah!

[iwantmass]

Does he really lack common sense this badly?  Or just trying to lose?

A week before the convention, and he's being criticized by both parties for praising saddam terrorist fighting tactics. 

He cannot really be this stupid and thick, can he?

Link please

[Erik C]

Trump Has A Bad Habit Of Telling The Truth. It Greatly Offends The Sensibilities Of The Libtards. Saddam Hussein Was An SOB, And That's The Only Kind Of Leader That Has Ever Been Effective In the Middle East. You Need Someone Who Will Keep The muslim Animals In Line.

[240 is Back]

Link please

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politics/donald-trump-saddam-hussein-iraq-terrorism/

[Soul Crusher]

Trump said what democrats have been screaming for over a decade now.   

[Skeeter]

Link please

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politics/donald-trump-saddam-hussein-iraq-terrorism/

[iwantmass]

The first line was " he was a bad guy, a really bad guy."  That is not praise just because CNN says it is.  A competent person can recognize his reference as a counterpoint to our current stance on terrorism, which is much too passive.  

One should be able to look at something analytically, such as saddam's stance on terrorism, without simple minded people associating it with praise or compliment.

I can just as easily say that Hitler was a good leader.  I mean no praise by that, rather I mean he was able to motive an entire nation of people to engage in his insane goals.  That takes leadership abilities.

For someone with such a high iq, I would think you could distinguish between praise and analysis

[240 is Back]

The first line was " he was a bad guy, a really bad guy."  That is not praise just because CNN says it is.  A competent person can recognize his reference as a counterpoint to our current stance on terrorism, which is much too passive. 

trump wants harsher torture + execution of wives/babies of terrorists. 

Our govt has already said it's an order they won't follow.   There's no need to pretend trump's positions on terrorism are legitimate - they are not, and they will not be followed, our military has already made that clear. 

[iwantmass]

trump wants harsher torture + execution of wives/babies of terrorists. 

Our govt has already said it's an order they won't follow.   There's no need to pretend trump's positions on terrorism are legitimate - they are not, and they will not be followed, our military has already made that clear. 

Stop trying to use the emotional argument of a woman. He never said he wants to execute wives and babies.  No wonder another man slapped you in the face.  You were probably on an estrogen high at the time, you exaggerating sissy.

[240 is Back]

He never said he wants to execute wives and babies.

O RLY?

Donald Trump on terrorists: 'Take out their families'

http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/02/politics/donald-trump-terrorists-families/

[iwantmass]

O RLY?

Donald Trump on terrorists: 'Take out their families'

http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/02/politics/donald-trump-terrorists-families/

As usual, you left out the full quote. He was referring to when they use their family members as human shields.  That doesn't qualify as executing them. I don't think you know what "execute" means.

We call that collateral damage

[240 is Back]

As usual, you left out the full quote. He was referring to when they use their family members as human shields.  That doesn't qualify as executing them. I don't think you know what "execute" means.

We call that collateral damage

LOL @ "We" call that collateral damage.

Are you on Trump's terrorist destruction team now?  lol

Trump is a joke, to dems, and to his own party.  The only people who truly believe in him are delusional, immature, and just plain stupid - and he proudly exclaims his love for the low-educated.

That being said, it's a beautiful day in America, let's enjoy it.

[headhuntersix]

This is all well and good but while trump says dumb shit...Hil actually does the dumb shit that has gotten people killed. No thread on that hmmm

[240 is Back]

This is all well and good but while trump says dumb shit...Hil actually does the dumb shit that has gotten people killed. No thread on that hmmm

Trump doesn't have power yet.   

Hilary's been in power for 25 years, in one way or another, and yes, her actions have gotten some people killed, no denying that.

I'm saying Trump has called for greater torture and killing of bad guys' families... the ramifications of that are unthinkable for our own soldiers. Trump is an idiot and his policies may cause much more than hilary has caused.

besides - you're still blaming hilary for benghazi?  obama was at the wheel running that shit - he's just not a convenient political target   hilary was compliant in following orders, but obama admits he was following it every inch of the way, and his call is the final one  not hilarys.   he's jut not up for re-eleciton   

[iwantmass]

LOL @ "We" call that collateral damage.

Are you on Trump's terrorist destruction team now?  lol

Trump is a joke, to dems, and to his own party.  The only people who truly believe in him are delusional, immature, and just plain stupid - and he proudly exclaims his love for the low-educated.

That being said, it's a beautiful day in America, let's enjoy it.

I don't like trump or hillary, but I also don't use trigger words such as "execute" that were never used in the first place, all in the hopes to stroke the estrogen of the weak liberals in an attempt to win my shitty lie-based argument. I try to rely on facts

[240 is Back]

I don't like trump or hillary, but I also don't use trigger words such as "execute" that were never used in the first place, all in the hopes to stroke the estrogen of the weak liberals in an attempt to win my shitty lie-based argument. I try to rely on facts

"take out" = you think that means anything other than kill them?

[iwantmass]

"take out" = you think that means anything other than kill them?

Yes, he would be willing to take them out if they acted as human shields.  He isn't talking about kicking in doors of innocent house wives and grabbing babies out of cribs and setting them on their knees and putting a 22 behind their ears, all in an attempt to draw out their husbands/fathers.  

Thus the difference between execution and collateral damage.

If you aren't okay with him bombing a terror compound that happens to.have 3 innocents among 150 terrorists, then say something. That is fine and one stance in the argument. That's not what you said. 

[240 is Back]

Yes, he would be willing to take them out if they acted as human shields.

I re-read the article.  Trump said nothing about human shields.  Only you did  

[iwantmass]

I re-read the article.  Trump said nothing about human shields.  Only you did  

Wrong again, dumb ass . Go actually look up the whole quote. That's why I urged you to link the whole thing.  I took 5 seconds outta my day to look up the complete quote, rather than take CNN at their word

Are you letting Andre post under your account?  You always lie, but this is pretty slow witted.even for you. It reeks of below average iq andre

[iwantmass]

Yeah....I thought so. I'm done with this guy as cousin Vinnie would say

[TheShape.]

A little late to the party here, he's been saying this for months. Cue the Lincoln shot picture.

[iwantmass]

A little late to the party here, he's been saying this for months. Cue the Lincoln shot picture.

Except he never said it. Read the previous posts. It's all in the context

[240 is Back]

Doesn't matter if sadaam was effective in an area.  You don't praise the guy.  

Presidents' words have massive historical impact.   History will read "US president admired Saddam for his handling of terrorists, but criticized Obama, Bush, Clinton, for their handling of it".

Trump has no problem kissing ass with Putin, though.

[iwantmass]

Doesn't matter if sadaam was effective in an area.  You don't praise the guy.  

Presidents' words have massive historical impact.   History will read "US president admired Saddam for his handling of terrorists, but criticized Obama, Bush, Clinton, for their handling of it".

Trump has no problem kissing ass with Putin, though.

We've been over this. He didn't praise him.  He is saying a really bad guy did a better job than our really shitty president.  You've lost this one. Move on to the next round. You didn't even do your research on your own quote to understand he talked about human shields