Author Topic: Dallas Shooter Vs Robot GRAPHIC (Read 9139 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **on:** July 10, 2016, 10:55:56 AM »

Robot wins

Schnauzer · « **Reply #1 on:** July 10, 2016, 10:59:36 AM »

Conker · « **Reply #2 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:05:01 AM »

lucky they had a robot to hand because he made of mockery of the swat team.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #3 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:06:33 AM »

Quote from: Conker on July 10, 2016, 11:05:01 AM

lucky they had a robot to hand because he made of mockery of the swat team.

Snipers do that

visualizeperfection · « **Reply #4 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:08:52 AM »

Quote from: Conker on July 10, 2016, 11:05:01 AM

lucky they had a robot to hand because he made of mockery of the swat team.

Generally barricaded people do that.

I'm sure you supported that savages cause, considering you're a muslim hugging pussy.

Schnauzer · « **Reply #5 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:10:55 AM »

I'm waiting for Black Lives Matter to start calling robots racist

Conker · « **Reply #6 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:15:14 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on July 10, 2016, 11:06:33 AM

Snipers do that

sniper? a sniper is someone shooting from a concealed position. how can you send a robot in to kill someone if his position is concealed

just a gunman that appears to have been much more highly skilled than his opponents.

Kim Jong Bob · « **Reply #7 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:16:15 AM »

Quote from: Schnauzer on July 10, 2016, 11:10:55 AM

I'm waiting for Black Lives Matter to start calling robots racist

lål

And those fucners that are complaining that it was not necessary to send in a robot and blow him up.... 5 cops where already dead they why risk more cops lifes. If those who are compmainomg had a son in the swat team where he was barricaded they would habe applauded at the cops decision... Fycking hypocritez

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #8 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:16:42 AM »

Quote from: Conker on July 10, 2016, 11:15:14 AM

sniper? a sniper is someone shooting from a concealed position. how can you send a robot in to kill someone if his position is concealed

just a gunman that appears to have been much more highly skilled than his opponents.

He killed officers from a concealed position. He wasn't " highly skilled " seeing he got himself boxed in and killed by a robot

Schnauzer · « **Reply #9 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:18:17 AM »

Quote from: Kim Jong Bob on July 10, 2016, 11:16:15 AM

lål

And those fucners that are complaining that it was not necessary to send in a robot and blow him up.... 5 cops where already dead they why risk more cops lifes. If those who are compmainomg had a son in the swat team where he was barricaded they would habe applauded at the cops decision... Fycking hypocritez

The original robots were black. FACT!

BB · « **Reply #10 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:20:00 AM »

Kim Jong Bob · « **Reply #11 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:22:49 AM »

Quote from: Schnauzer on July 10, 2016, 11:18:17 AM

The original robots were black. FACT!

hahahahhahahahahahahaahha im dying hahaha

Schnauzer · « **Reply #12 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:23:27 AM »

Black Robots Matter (by the way, this robot owes $25,000 in child support)

Conker · « **Reply #13 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:24:51 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on July 10, 2016, 11:16:42 AM

He killed officers from a concealed position. He wasn't " highly skilled " seeing he got himself boxed in and killed by a robot

well i'm sure iv'e seen footage where he kills at least one cop in an exchange of fire on the ground.

i never said he was "highly skilled" i said he was more highly skilled than his opponents. whether that qualifies him as "highly skilled" per se, i don't know.

again how do you send a robot into a concealed position

you understand that concealed means hidden right?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #14 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:32:24 AM »

Quote from: Conker on July 10, 2016, 11:24:51 AM

well i'm sure iv'e seen footage where he kills at least one cop in an exchange of fire on the ground.

i never said he was "highly skilled" i said he was more highly skilled than his opponents. whether that qualifies him as "highly skilled" per se, i don't know.

again how do you send a robot into a concealed position you understand that concealed means hidden right?

Quote

well i'm sure iv'e seen footage where he kills at least one cop in an exchange of fire on the ground.

Okay , one instance.

Quote

i never said he was "highly skilled" i said he was more highly skilled than his opponents. whether that qualifies him as "highly skilled" per se, i don't know.

No you did say he was highly skilled

Quote

again how do you send a robot into a concealed position you understand that concealed means hidden right?

I didn't know that

you're boring and looking to argue for the sake of arguing , I'll entertain you to a degree.

SuperTed · « **Reply #15 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:35:10 AM »

Another angle. Arms look around 14 inches (BB related) -

_bruce_ · « **Reply #16 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:42:25 AM »

Short Circuit + Good riddance

SquidVicious · « **Reply #17 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:48:20 AM »

Y'all do know that the death of this terrorist will be included in statistics showing 'black men killed by police in 2016' right? Just another misleading use of statistics.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #18 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:52:38 AM »

Quote from: SquidVicious on July 10, 2016, 11:48:20 AM

Y'all do know that the death of this terrorist will be included in statistics showing 'black men killed by police in 2016' right? Just another misleading use of statistics.

LMAO Great point. Just like when the anti-gun people claim 18 and 19 year olds as children gunned down , forget the fact they were gangbangers

Conker · « **Reply #19 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:55:06 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on July 10, 2016, 11:32:24 AM

Okay , one instance.

No you did say he was highly skilled

I didn't know that you're boring and looking to argue for the sake of arguing , I'll entertain you to a degree.

you're talking sht and you're a moron. the guy was not a sniper he was a "gunman" and he was obviously more skilled than his opponents because he managed to shoot 12 of them whilst not being hit by a single bullet.

you really think you are smart and you win arguments on here. you're not and you don't. you just go on and on and on and on beyond the point that any normal person can be bothered to keep responding. and you're calling me boring? lol

you probably only post on here because no one can actually endure talking to you in real life.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #20 on:** July 10, 2016, 11:58:22 AM »

Quote from: Conker on July 10, 2016, 11:55:06 AM

you're talking sht and you're a moron. the guy was not a sniper he was a "gunman" and he was obviously more skilled than his opponents because he managed to shoot 12 of them whilst not being hit by a single bullet.

you really think you are smart and you win arguments on here. you're not and you don't. you just go on and on and on and on beyond the point that any normal person can be bothered to keep responding. and you're calling me boring? lol

you probably only post on here because no one can actually endure talking to you in real life.

Quote

you're talking sht and you're a moron. the guy was not a sniper he was a "gunman" and he was obviously more skilled than his opponents because he managed to shoot 12 of them whilst not being hit by a single bullet.

Thanks for proving me right. " the guy was not a sniper " Like I said I'll entertain you to a degree but your novelty has worn off. Run along now let the adults laugh at the dead sniper.

SquidVicious · « **Reply #21 on:** July 10, 2016, 12:01:24 PM »

Is it protocol to bypass use of flashbangs, tear gas and smoke bombs in favor of explosive devices when one has killed 5 officers? Was he killed out of vengeance because a conviction without eyewitnesses or video would have been difficult to obtain and painful for the families? Happy for the outcome but curious as to why they couldn't have extracted a cornered man with so much technology at their disposal. Kinda like a smaller, expedited version of Waco.

visualizeperfection · « **Reply #22 on:** July 10, 2016, 12:11:08 PM »

Quote from: SquidVicious on July 10, 2016, 12:01:24 PM

Is it protocol to bypass use of flashbangs, tear gas and smoke bombs in favor of explosive devices when one has killed 5 officers? Was he killed out of vengeance because a conviction without eyewitnesses or video would have been difficult to obtain and painful for the families? Happy for the outcome but curious as to why they couldn't have extracted a cornered man with so much technology at their disposal. Kinda like a smaller, expedited version of Waco.

Wasn't coming out alive. They probably refused to risk a single other life. Understandably.

I prefer when they burn people to death in these sort of situations.

240 is Back · « **Reply #23 on:** July 10, 2016, 12:18:33 PM »

what's that show where 2 robots battle?

they should have that kinda setup. Two teams of robot builders, limited explosive... see who can take out the shooter first, using wit, creativity, strategy and technology.

HonestBob · « **Reply #24 on:** July 10, 2016, 12:20:18 PM »

Quote from: Conker on July 10, 2016, 11:05:01 AM

lucky they had a robot to hand because he made of mockery of the swat team.

There's a certain glee to the way that you write these posts.

Are you glad that he took out so many cops?
Do you support BLM and feel no sympathy for scared, jumpy, poorly trained cops who get a disproportionate amount of trouble from blacks?