The crimes of Hillary Clinton

[loco]

Hillary Clinton admitted to destroying subpoenaed evidence after she was on notice of the existence of the subpoena. That's known as obstruction of justice, as well as destruction of the documents. She also committed the crime of "putting classified information in a non-classified venue. This is the same crime which former CIA head Gen. David Petraeus pleaded guilty to.

you keep deleting and reposting this.

Because you keep avoiding his answer to your question.

[240 is Back]

Here is a video showing Trump shitting all over Paula Jones, and saying Hillary would make a great VP or President.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/09/30/this-video-might-make-it-harder-for-trump-to-attack-hillary-over-bills-affairs/?utm_term=.f249b8f6a438

I disagree with trump here. 

[James]

[iwantmass]

Tim, what is your opinion of Bill Clinton coincidentally meeting Loretta Lynch the week before hillary's fbi interview?  Do you buy that out of 320 million people and 1000s of airports in the US, Bill Clinton happened to be at the same airport, on the same time/date as his former employee? Do you after that highly unlikely scenario, that he then recognized Loretta Lynch's plane, exited his own and talked about grand children for almost an hour?

Do those seem like the actions of an innocent person?

Are you really going to tell us that you only think a person is guilty only if they are indicted/convicted?  Do you think hillary's high political status and connections, such as Loretta Lynch meeting bill a week before her fbi interview, play no bearing in her lack of indictment?

If you buy all of that and your standard for committing a crime is an indictment, then that fella that shot up that gay club committed no crime because he was certainly never indicted/convicted.  He didn't even get the right to a fair trial.  Maybe he was defending himself against all the assaults of the homosexuals in that club

[loco]

Tim, what is your opinion of Bill Clinton coincidentally meeting Loretta Lynch the week before hillary's fbi interview?  Do you buy that out of 320 million people and 1000s of airports in the US, Bill Clinton happened to be at the same airport, on the same time/date as his former employee? Do you after that highly unlikely scenario, that he then recognized Loretta Lynch's plane, exited his own and talked about grand children for almost an hour?

Do those seem like the actions of an innocent person?

Are you really going to tell us that you only think a person is guilty only if they are indicted/convicted?  Do you think hillary's high political status and connections, such as Loretta Lynch meeting bill a week before her fbi interview, play no bearing in her lack of indictment?

If you buy all of that and your standard for committing a crime is an indictment, then that fella that shot up that gay club committed no crime because he was certainly never indicted/convicted.  He didn't even get the right to a fair trial.  Maybe he was defending himself against all the assaults of the homosexuals in that club

Hmmm

"Certainly, my meeting with him raises questions and concerns," Lynch acknowledged today. "It has now cast a shadow over how this case may be perceived, no matter how it's resolved. ... [But] it's important to make it clear that that meeting with President Clinton does not have a bearing on how this matter is going to be reviewed, resolved and accepted by me."

She added, however: "I certainly wouldn't do it again."

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/attorney-general-loretta-lynch-calls-perfectly-reasonable-question/story?id=40272091

[iwantmass]

Hmmm

"Certainly, my meeting with him raises questions and concerns," Lynch acknowledged today. "It has now cast a shadow over how this case may be perceived, no matter how it's resolved. ... [But] it's important to make it clear that that meeting with President Clinton does not have a bearing on how this matter is going to be reviewed, resolved and accepted by me."

She added, however: "I certainly wouldn't do it again."

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/attorney-general-loretta-lynch-calls-perfectly-reasonable-question/story?id=40272091

Well, I'm sure that's good enough for tim....

An ethical person would remove herself from the process and appoint an independent prosecutor....as donald trump suggested last night

[loco]

Well, I'm sure that's good enough for tim....

An ethical person would remove herself from the process and appoint an independent prosecutor....as donald trump suggested last night

Hmmm

"WASHINGTON — Republican lawmakers pummeled Attorney General Loretta Lynch with questions Tuesday about the Justice Department's decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton for sending classified information on a private, unsecured email system, but Lynch repeatedly declined to explain the legal basis for the decision."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/07/12/loretta-lynch-bill-clinton-meeting-hillary-clinton-emails/86951794/

[timfogarty]

Tim, what is your opinion of Bill Clinton coincidentally meeting Loretta Lynch the week before hillary's fbi interview?  Do you buy that out of 320 million people and 1000s of airports in the US, Bill Clinton happened to be at the same airport, on the same time/date as his former employee? Do you after that highly unlikely scenario, that he then recognized Loretta Lynch's plane, exited his own and talked about grand children for almost an hour?

I think it was inappropriate, but that doesn't mean any wrongdoing occurred.  It makes no sense as it was so public.  If he wanted to influence her decision, there were lots of more private ways he could have.  My guess is that he wanted a heads up on was about to happen.  Remember, we've had over 30 years of the Clinton's enemies going after them.  From Whitewater to today.  Also remember it wasn't Lynch's sole decision whether to prosecute or not.  Supposedly influencing her would not have been enough.

[Las Vegas]

The whole left-or-right "conflict" is a lie and nothing but a stage-show at that level.  They aren't out to get one another, at all.  They're working together, and against us.  That's what's happening.

[Dos Equis]

alt-right is the name used by Trump's base, the Breitbart crowd, the 4chan crowd, they tend to be white nationalist.

Ok.  I just looked it up.  This is wrong.  I know and have talked to a number of "Trump's base" and they don't fall into that category at all.  This is just another way of trying to put Trump supporters in the basket of deplorables.  

And you are calling the "Breitbart crowd" "white nationalists"?  Seriously?  

[Dos Equis]

you keep deleting and reposting this.

where does she admit to destroying subpoenaed evidence after she was on notice of the existence of the subpoena ?  The timeline I gave above showed the 33,000 private emails were deleted four months before the Benghazi committee requested them.

Your timeline is wrong.  The subpoena was issued on 4 March 2015.  Platte River Networks used BleachBit to wipe her server between 25-31 March 2015. 

[iwantmass]

I think it was inappropriate, but that doesn't mean any wrongdoing occurred.  It makes no sense as it was so public.  If he wanted to influence her decision, there were lots of more private ways he could have.  My guess is that he wanted a heads up on was about to happen.  Remember, we've had over 30 years of the Clinton's enemies going after them.  From Whitewater to today.  Also remember it wasn't Lynch's sole decision whether to prosecute or not.  Supposedly influencing her would not have been enough.

Got it.  You just proved to me you are a biased liar.  It wasn't public at all. In fact, Loretta lynch was shocked when she was asked about it. They had no plans to reveal this meeting, nor did she address the subject matter when she spoke in front of Congress, choosing instead to remain silent to almost every relevant question.  Lynch solely made the decision not to prosecute, as she said at the lack of evidence provided from the fbi investigation.

You need to stick to sucking dick and leave the facts to honest people.  It was well past inappropriate. As I stated earlier, any ethical person would have removed herself from the position and appointed an independent prosecutor, so the case didn't look tainted

[mazrim]

Tim and Prime are perfect examples of party voters. Know nothing and simply vote because their is a D next to their name.

[Yamcha]

Tim and Prime are perfect examples of party voters. Know nothing and simply vote because their is a D next to their name.

They fall right in line...

[Las Vegas]

Coach do you have such little faith in the US Government?  In the FBI?  I mean - we're not talking some small sub-committee investigated her... It was the FBI???

Lmao.  The FBI works 100% from the top downward.  It takes orders.  An agenda exists.

“The FBI was thwarted from interviewing the Saudis we wanted to interview by the White House,” said former FBI agent Mark Rossini, who was involved in the investigation of al Qaeda and the hijackers. The White House “let them off the hook.”

What’s more, Rossini said the bureau was told no subpoenas could be served to produce evidence tying departing Saudi suspects to 9/11. The FBI, in turn, iced local investigations that led back to the Saudis.

Tell me again how we need to "have faith" in the FBI for any reason whatsoever.

[BIG ACH]

Lmao.  The FBI works 100% from the top downward.  It takes orders.  An agenda exists.

Tell me again how we need to "have faith" in the FBI for any reason whatsoever.

So you are saying the nation's highest law enforcement agency is just a big whoop and... what should exactly happen?

A) Be dismantled?

B)  Be prosecuted for not going after Hillary harder?

C)  Other (Please elaborate?)

[Las Vegas]

So you are saying the nation's highest law enforcement agency is just a big whoop and... what should exactly happen?

A) Be dismantled?

B)  Be prosecuted for not going after Hillary harder?

C)  Other (Please elaborate?)

What did you mean by what you said to Coach?  Maybe I misunderstood.

[Las Vegas]

Your timeline is wrong.  The subpoena was issued on 4 March 2015.  Platte River Networks used BleachBit to wipe her server between 25-31 March 2015. 

Interesting.

Tim?

[BIG ACH]

What did you mean by what you said to Coach?  Maybe I misunderstood.

I'm saying that one can't say the system is rigged and the FBI is corrupt because Hillary didn't end up in Jail and because things didn't go the way they wanted them to.

I'm also saying that maybe I appreciate the correctness of the system here because I grew up in a country where the system truly is rigged.

[Las Vegas]

I'm saying that one can't say the system is rigged and the FBI is corrupt because Hillary didn't end up in Jail and because things didn't go the way they wanted them to.

There are many reasons to believe the FBI doesn't act as it should, and Hillary's treatment supports that.  

I'm also saying that maybe I appreciate the correctness of the system here because I grew up in a country where the system truly is rigged.

I'm sure you wouldn't want us to lower our standards just because Egypt is worse, though.

[BIG ACH]

There are many reasons to believe the FBI doesn't act as it should, and Hillary's treatment supports that.  

I'm sure you wouldn't want us to lower our standards just because Egypt is worse, though.

Can you share those many reasons?  

Lets not forget that its not the FBI alone, but its also the State Department, and the Justice Department that have stated Clinton did not commit a crime here.

Are you saying now that they are all in Clinton's pockets??



And no I don't want you to lower your standards, on the contrary, I want you to actually take pride in how good you really have it here!

[Las Vegas]

Can you share those many reasons?

They took orders to stop investigating Saudis on 911. 

Lets not forget that its not the FBI alone, but its also the State Department, and the Justice Department that have stated Clinton did not commit a crime here.

Give me a quote if you will.

Are you saying now that they are all in Clinton's pockets??

I wouldn't know exactly how to put it or say it, without having all the necessary info.

[Las Vegas]

And no I don't want you to lower your standards, on the contrary, I want you to actually take pride in how good you really have it here!

Would you make that argument for any old place, as long as you could point out somewhere worse?  

I don't think so, Ach.

[iwantmass]

Can you share those many reasons?  

Lets not forget that its not the FBI alone, but its also the State Department, and the Justice Department that have stated Clinton did not commit a crime here.

Are you saying now that they are all in Clinton's pockets??



And no I don't want you to lower your standards, on the contrary, I want you to actually take pride in how good you really have it here!

Perhaps you missed the part where hillary's husband, who is also Loretta Lynch's former boss, met with lynch a week prior to her fbi interview, in private and lied about the details of their meeting.

As the previous poster said, just because you are from a shit hole country doesn't mean we should not strive to be corruption free. It's not good enough to be better than egypt. That's like being the least fat obese person

[BIG ACH]

Give me a quote if you will.

Justice Department:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/statement-attorney-general-loretta-e-lynch-regarding-state-department-email-investigation

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch released the following statement today regarding the State Department email investigation:

“Late this afternoon, I met with FBI Director James Comey and career prosecutors and agents who conducted the investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email system during her time as Secretary of State.  I received and accepted their unanimous recommendation that the thorough, year-long investigation be closed and that no charges be brought against any individuals within the scope of the investigation.”

State Department:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/state-department-releasing-clinton-emails-today/story?id=42641518

The State Department released 273 pages of Hillary Clinton’s emails today, reigniting a controversy that has haunted her campaign for president since the time she announced she was running more than a year ago.

...

State Department officials point out that more than half of the emails released today are near-duplicate copies of emails it has already produced to the public. These officials say the only difference, in some cases, is an additional email at the end of a chain.