Author Topic: Underrated Tim Belknap (Read 10619 times)

Danimal77 · « **on:** October 29, 2016, 12:52:47 AM »

5'4" and 245 pound (at his heaviest) diabetic Tim Belknap. Not a pretty physique, but freaky for such a small guy. He either came in light or HUGE. He was either striated and shredded or wasn't. He had some of the best leg development ever. He was a cut mass monster and a cross between Tom Platz, Rich Gaspari and Dorian.

Danimal77 · « **Reply #1 on:** October 29, 2016, 12:58:31 AM »

Danimal77 · « **Reply #2 on:** October 29, 2016, 12:59:42 AM »

Danimal77 · « **Reply #3 on:** October 29, 2016, 01:02:56 AM »

Some of the best legs EVER and could get ripped to fucking shreds.

honest · « **Reply #4 on:** October 29, 2016, 02:37:30 AM »

with todays judging criteria of mass at the expense of everything else Belknap could have been really succesful, the modern era of no shape aesthetics symmetry sucks

Royalty · « **Reply #5 on:** October 29, 2016, 04:47:27 AM »

Terrible pecs. Narrow shoulders. Weak delts. Underwhelming arms. V-taper sucked. Back was probably awful.

falco · « **Reply #6 on:** October 29, 2016, 04:49:54 AM »

Lets not forget he was a insulin user without growth or gut.

The Scott · « **Reply #7 on:** October 29, 2016, 06:54:13 AM »

Quote from: Royalty on October 29, 2016, 04:47:27 AM

Terrible pecs. Narrow shoulders. Weak delts. Underwhelming arms. V-taper sucked. Back was probably awful.

Agree. He looks like a mutant butt-plug. He was awful back then and looking back now he is still awful. Drugs can make anyone bigger and stronger but not better.

Columbu and Padilla are worlds better than this guy.

fredrollon · « **Reply #8 on:** October 29, 2016, 07:16:39 AM »

Yamcha · « **Reply #9 on:** October 29, 2016, 07:17:30 AM »

Goddamn, I love the smell of homosexuality in the morning.

Skylge · « **Reply #10 on:** October 29, 2016, 08:20:13 AM »

Bloated face and odd proportions

BIG AL MCKECHNIE · « **Reply #11 on:** October 29, 2016, 08:24:33 AM »

He was a hideous little fellow if the truth be told.

Kwon · « **Reply #12 on:** October 29, 2016, 08:53:18 AM »

5´4" = 162 cm...

Parker · « **Reply #13 on:** October 29, 2016, 10:15:16 AM »

He must have been 245 in the offseason. He is the father of the bloofy insulin look.

Nether Animal · « **Reply #14 on:** October 29, 2016, 10:26:47 AM »

Terrible chest.

Danimal77 · « **Reply #15 on:** October 29, 2016, 11:47:23 AM »

Quote from: falco on October 29, 2016, 04:49:54 AM

Lets not forget he was a insulin user without growth or gut.

He was diabetic. He used insulin because of his diabetes.

m8 · « **Reply #16 on:** October 29, 2016, 11:50:54 AM »

R.I.P hairline

Looks like a bag of smashed assholes.

Henda · « **Reply #17 on:** October 29, 2016, 12:00:15 PM »

Stupid looking hair when he had the perm

Fallsview · « **Reply #18 on:** October 29, 2016, 12:35:13 PM »

Underrated? BAAAHAAAAA.....we could care less about him in the 80's. BUT....he was diabetic and used insulin...hence the box/wide waste physique. He was the first to show how things were going to come. Too bad he didn't use more and combine it with high amounts of STH...BOOM 1994 would have magically appeared in 1982.

Danimal77 · « **Reply #19 on:** October 29, 2016, 12:50:52 PM »

Quote from: Kwon on October 29, 2016, 08:53:18 AM

5´4" = 162 cm...

162.56 cm

....... 64" (5'4") * 2.54cm (1") = 162.56cm

Danimal77 · « **Reply #20 on:** October 29, 2016, 12:52:35 PM »

You guys can shit on him as much as you want, but he had great fucking quad development and he improved as the years went by.

The Abdominal Snoman · « **Reply #21 on:** October 29, 2016, 01:31:23 PM »

Quote from: falco on October 29, 2016, 04:49:54 AM

Lets not forget he was a insulin user without growth or gut.

But back in the day people notices his "gut" was bigger than most in person. Thick waist. I believe Belknap is one of the reason's people looked at Insulin as a muscle builder...

The Abdominal Snoman · « **Reply #22 on:** October 29, 2016, 01:32:34 PM »

Quote from: Royalty on October 29, 2016, 04:47:27 AM

Terrible pecs. Narrow shoulders. Weak delts. Underwhelming arms. V-taper sucked. Back was probably awful.

This^^^Belknap was the beginnings of what insulin does to the body.

8 INCH not biceps · « **Reply #23 on:** October 29, 2016, 01:35:11 PM »

He is a midget he can hang out with branch warren they both look horrible.

hench · « **Reply #24 on:** October 29, 2016, 03:45:22 PM »

was gonna say he looked dense and conditioned but nowhere near 245 and would have probably had to look very overweight to get to that.

Quote from: Parker on October 29, 2016, 10:15:16 AM

He must have been 245 in the offseason. He is the father of the bloofy insulin look.