Woman attacks man, man defends himself, woman now fighting for her life

[Board_SHERIF]

You're the manlet with the thread devoted to dudes with boobs.  I just point out that you are in fact, and this is clearly evidenced by the aforementioned thread, a lover of the transjenners.  

Silly little manlet.   The only way this could be worse for you is if you are muslim too.

80 year old Closet Poof Cawk Suker Scott

[lilhawk1]

Fuck her... She had no right to hit him, swing at him, etc.  She won't pull that shit again.  Women think they can do/say whatever the fuck they want to a man with no repercussions.  Wrong..

[SF1900]

He responded to a punch in the face with a punch in the face, how was this not justified?

That is not the way the jury will see it. It's just the way it is. If she attacked him with a gun or knife, different story.

Her hitting him in the face and him laying her out, will not be perceived as necessary.

I am not saying if he was in the right or wrong--I have no opinion on the matter.

I am just stating how I believe the LAW will see it.

PIP for this guy.

[SF1900]

and if she had hit him again and he fell and hit his head and ended up on life support you would have said what?

But this is not the way it works. A lawyer won't play that angle because its purely hypothetical.

They can only go on the evidence. She hit him in the face. He hit her back. She may die.

Again, PIP for this guy. He will most likely plead out.

[FREAKgeek]

how do you know she didnt have the right to hit [him]? you dont know what happened before that

exactly

[spiro]

I thought women wanted equality in all matters.

[Simple Simon]

That is not the way the jury will see it. It's just the way it is. If she attacked him with a gun or knife, different story.

Her hitting him in the face and him laying her out, will not be perceived as necessary.

I am not saying if he was in the right or wrong--I have no opinion on the matter.

I am just stating how I believe the LAW will see it.

PIP for this guy.

How do you know how a jury will see it, what if 12 people on the jury had your opinion?

Isnt it odd, a man can get jailed for hitting a woman who hits him yet another has no charges filed for blowing an unarmed mans head off who trespasses on his property.

[illuminati]

and if she had hit him again and he fell and hit his head and ended up on life support you would have said what?

I nowt care, I just stated the law..the guy is facing charges etc...
I could care less if you knock women out and justify it, have fun

You were asked a direct reasonable question by Be There
And are unable to answer it..
After White Knighting For Her -- You Are Found Lacking
When asked to Defend Your Position..

Tip - Give up trying to argue. You Get Owned.

[Erik C]

The guy's a little runt. Everyone picks on him, even women. He won't get charged because he's a manlet, as anyone who attacks him, male or female, is a threat to his life. It's not like he was standing there kicking her when she was down. He hit her, and got out of harms way, as he saw it. Sure it would have been better if he manned up, and bitch slapped her once, grabbed her pussy, and told her let's go settle this in private, not here. Could have been a happy ending.

Plus, she was drunk/stoned, and out of control, when she hit him. Do stupid shit, and get stupid shit happen to you. Karma's a bitch.

[SF1900]

How do you know how a jury will see it, what if 12 people on the jury had your opinion?

Isnt it odd, a man can get jailed for hitting a woman who hits him yet another has no charges filed for blowing an unarmed mans head off who trespasses on his property.

Well, it also depends on the outcome. If she dies, trust me, he will be found guilty (or will plead out or something). Furthermore, I do not know how a jury will 100% perceive it. However, we knows how society views such situations. Do you really think if she dies, he is not going to either plead out or be convicted? lol haha. Oh boy. This happened in NEW JERSEY, NOT Texas or Arkansas. You obviously do not know the distinct local cultures by state.

Hell, in NYC, a robber tried to enter a MANS HOME and he shoots intruder and is charged with manslaughter (story can be found on google). And you actually think a women hitting a man in the face, and him laying her out, and if she dies, he won't be convicted?  

Now this is New Jersey, which states: the amount of force which the defendant uses must be necessary – this defense is unavailable if the actor is unreasonable in his belief about the amount of force necessary and if acting on this unreasonable belief the actor uses an excessive amount of force.

I can guarantee you a Jersey Jury will not believe the force was necessary, especially after viewing her hospital and funeral pictures.

[SF1900]

You were asked a direct reasonable question by Be There
And are unable to answer it..
After White Knighting For Her -- You Are Found Lacking
When asked to Defend Your Position..

Tip - Give up trying to argue. You Get Owned.

None of us are lawyers here and furthermore, you can never state with 100% certainty how a jury will react.

As I stated above, a man in NYC was charged with manslaughter after an intruder entered his home and he killed him. Jersey and NYC are neighboring states and have many laws which are similar. Based on that evidence, this man is going to face some time of jail or at least be convicted. I can bet you 99.9% that once a jury sees her hospital pictures, its over for him. This man will NOT be let off 100% free. Something will happen.

Again, you're not understanding the difference between the South and Northeast. In NYC (Jersey is also on the NorthEast), if you kill a home intruder, youre automatically charged with murder until proven otherwise (I am pretty sure this is true, based on what a cop told me, but I could be wrong). Anyway, the South and Northeast DRASTICALLY differ how they view such matters.

[illuminati]

None of us are lawyers here and furthermore, you can never state with 100% certainty how a jury will react.

As I stated above, a man in NYC was charged with manslaughter after an intruder entered his home and he killed him. Jersey and NYC are neighboring states and have many laws which are similar. Based on that evidence, this man is going to face some time of jail or at least be convicted. I can bet you 99.9% that once a jury sees her hospital pictures, its over for him. This man will NOT be let off 100% free. Something will happen.

Again, you're not understanding the difference between the South and Northeast. In NYC (Jersey is also on the NorthEast), if you kill a home intruder, youre automatically charged with murder until proven otherwise (I am pretty sure this is true, based on what a cop told me, but I could be wrong). Anyway, the South and Northeast DRASTICALLY differ how they view such matters.

How do you know Who is & is not a legal authority or what Proffesion they are on here.

I do not know what job people do on this board -

Likewise you / they don't know what job I do / have done.

Other than the above - No issue with your post / reasoning.

[SF1900]

How do you know Who is & is not a legal authority or what Proffesion they are on here.

I do not know what job people do on this board -

Likewise you / they don't know what job I do / have done.

Other than the above - No issue with your post / reasoning.

I don't, nor does it really matter who is a lawyer.

There are a lot of instances of people on the NorthEast engaging in supposedly self-defense, and still facing manslaughter or lesser charges. Again, its not the South. And these people were defending themselves against home intruders. And you actually think this man will face zero charges because a 115 pound women hit him in the face?  I will wait until he is caught and convicted (or pleas) out to say, "I told you so."

If you think this man will get off 100% Scott-Free, then you do not know much about America, let alone the NorthEast.

[ratherbebig]

Open question to all the holier than thou white knights in this thread

Have you ever been punched in the face by a woman, and if so what did you do?

i've been punched in the face by both men and women. i've never punched them back, what good would that do?

[illuminati]

I don't, nor does it really matter who is a lawyer.

 And you actually think this man will face zero charges because a 115 pound women hit him in the face?  I will wait until he is caught and convicted (or pleas) out to say, "I told you so."

If you think this man will get off 100% Scott-Free, then you do not know much about America, let alone the NorthEast.

1, You made the statement Regarding No one Being a Lawyer / expert in law
2, You are totally Wrong with your supposition about what I Think -
I Havnt stated anything about what he is likely to be charged with or found guilty not guilty of?
3, Yet again you are guessing as to what I think - That is a Mistake on your part.

I have commented on what little footage was shown, as to who was the cause of the
Problem in the 1st I have no idea & didn't comment on that.
Or the likely out come of any charges or trial.

[local hero]

i've been punched in the face by both men and women. i've never punched them back, what good would that do?

You never punched the men back either....

 I dunno if I could hit a woman properly tho, maybe a good slap Sean Connery style...( edit, I could full on chin a butch lesbian type thinking about it, perhaps not a normal girl)

[SF1900]

1, You made the statement Regarding No one Being a Lawyer / expert in law
2, You are totally Wrong with your supposition about what I Think -
I Havnt stated anything about what he is likely to be charged with or found guilty not guilty of?
3, Yet again you are guessing as to what I think - That is a Mistake on your part.

I have commented on what little footage was shown, as to who was the cause of the
Problem in the 1st I have no idea & didn't comment on that.
Or the likely out come of any charges or trial.

Fair enough.

Then I will wait to say to Be There, "told you so." 

[ratherbebig]

You never punched the men back either....

 I dunno if I could hit a woman properly tho, maybe a good slap Sean Connery style...( edit, I could full on chin a butch lesbian type thinking about it, perhaps not a normal girl)

there's a few exceptions, that mma woman cyborg being one
and rosanne

[Irongrip400]

Alcohol

This is the real problem. Some folks just can't handle their alcohol and ruin it for the rest of us who can. I've got a rule that I never drink when I've had a rough day, because alcohol may worsen those effects/affects.

[ratherbebig]

This is the real problem. Some folks just can't handle their alcohol and ruin it for the rest of us who can. I've got a rule that I never drink when I've had a rough day, because alcohol may worsen those effects/affects.

what if all your days are rough 

[illuminati]

Fair enough.

Then I will wait to say to Be There, "told you so." 

Thank you. 

Also 'Be There'made his Question to 'B.Sheriff' - not your goodself
Unless of course you are also B.Sheriff....  ... Ha.

[Griffith]

What happened to "men and women are equal?"

Seems some women only want to be equal when it suits them.

[f450]

Fair result. You should never hit another human... If you are a poorly raised violent piece of shit then removing you from the gene pool is a net plus for humanity.
Hopefully the guy gets off scot free and sues her for emotional damage if she recovers.

[Simple Simon]

Well, it also depends on the outcome. If she dies, trust me, he will be found guilty (or will plead out or something). Furthermore, I do not know how a jury will 100% perceive it. However, we knows how society views such situations. Do you really think if she dies, he is not going to either plead out or be convicted? lol haha. Oh boy. This happened in NEW JERSEY, NOT Texas or Arkansas. You obviously do not know the distinct local cultures by state.

Hell, in NYC, a robber tried to enter a MANS HOME and he shoots intruder and is charged with manslaughter (story can be found on google). And you actually think a women hitting a man in the face, and him laying her out, and if she dies, he won't be convicted?  

Now this is New Jersey, which states: the amount of force which the defendant uses must be necessary – this defense is unavailable if the actor is unreasonable in his belief about the amount of force necessary and if acting on this unreasonable belief the actor uses an excessive amount of force.

I can guarantee you a Jersey Jury will not believe the force was necessary, especially after viewing her hospital and funeral pictures.

You can waffle all you like, you keep quoting legislature that validates my argument in the mistaken belief it helps your point of view.

The guy got punched and he punched back, do you seriously think that he thought the legislation through prior to hitting her.
He believed punching her was required to protect himself and acted on that belief.
Now in hindsight he probably still thinks he was in the right to punch her but wishes he hadn't.
Her injuries were most likely caused when she hit the pavement not from the punch, I know that but for his actions she wouldn't have hit the pavement but alternatively but for her actions she wouldn't have been hit.

The law is an ass in cases like this and its about whats morally right that I'm concerned about.
Let me give you a similar question that Board Sheriff ran away from.
Imagine yourself sitting with the grieving parents of the young man in the scenario, he didn't hit the girl back and she hit him again and he ended up dead as a result.
The father says, "if only he had hit her back he would be alive today"

Now, do you say "thats unacceptable, he shouldn't hit a woman"

[Sokolsky]

Nobody can reasonably expect to inflict the injury she incurred through a mere punch, so it will not be seen in court as an attempt on her life.

Use of deadly force refers to more than landing a simple punch.


Also, gross misrepresentation by the media of the situation at hand. Not least the warped view of the parents and whiteknights.