Author Topic: President Trump  (Read 93916 times)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #125 on: December 01, 2016, 09:42:42 AM »


Is Twitter Willing to Ban President-Elect Trump?

In 2012, the general manager of Twitter in the UK spoke at the Guardian Changing Media Summit: “Generally, we remain neutral as to the content because our general council and CEO like to say that we are the free speech wing of the free speech party.”

Boy, have things changed since then.

Earlier this month, Twitter suspended a number of accounts associated with the alt-right movement. Among those suspended was Richard Spencer, the National Policy Institute, Radix Journal, Paul Town, Pax Dickinson, Ricky Vaughn and John Rivers. Some might argue that Twitter’s suspension of these accounts is content discrimination. In other words, Twitter is censoring users simply because of their views. That doesn't sound like “remaining neutral” or promoting free speech.

Unfortunately, censorship seems to be Twitter’s new favorite weapon - and it’s not afraid to take aim at Trump.

Slate recently asked Twitter whether it would consider banning key government officials or even the president. A company spokesperson responded via email: “The Twitter Rules prohibit violent threats, harassment, hateful conduct, and multiple account abuse, and we will take action on accounts violating those policies.”

Slate pushed a bit more, asking if Trump could be suspended if he violated these policies, hypothetically speaking.

“The Twitter Rules apply to all accounts, including verified accounts,” the spokesperson responded.

(Town Hall)

Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: President Trump
« Reply #126 on: December 01, 2016, 09:46:40 AM »
I believe Trump knows it isn't a practical long-term strategy, but that he was determined to make a good show on his promise in due time.

Bernie Sanders: Carrier just showed corporations how to beat Donald Trump

Today, about 1,000 Carrier workers and their families should be rejoicing. But the rest of our nation’s workers should be very nervous.

President-elect Donald Trump will reportedly announce a deal with United Technologies, the corporation that owns Carrier, that keeps less than 1,000 of the 2100 jobs in America that were previously scheduled to be transferred to Mexico. Let’s be clear: It is not good enough to save some of these jobs. Trump made a promise that he would save all of these jobs, and we cannot rest until an ironclad contract is signed to ensure that all of these workers are able to continue working in Indiana without having their pay or benefits slashed.

In exchange for allowing United Technologies to continue to offshore more than 1,000 jobs, Trump will reportedly give the company tax and regulatory favors that the corporation has sought. Just a short few months ago, Trump was pledging to force United Technologies to “pay a damn tax.” He was insisting on very steep tariffs for companies like Carrier that left the United States and wanted to sell their foreign-made products back in the United States. Instead of a damn tax, the company will be rewarded with a damn tax cut. Wow! How’s that for standing up to corporate greed? How’s that for punishing corporations that shut down in the United States and move abroad?

In essence, United Technologies took Trump hostage and won. And that should send a shock wave of fear through all workers across the country.

Trump has endangered the jobs of workers who were previously safe in the United States. Why? Because he has signaled to every corporation in America that they can threaten to offshore jobs in exchange for business-friendly tax benefits and incentives. Even corporations that weren’t thinking of offshoring jobs will most probably be re-evaluating their stance this morning. And who would pay for the high cost for tax cuts that go to the richest businessmen in America? The working class of America.  

Let’s be clear. United Technologies is not going broke. Last year, it made a profit of $7.6 billion and received more than $6 billion in defense contracts. It has also received more than $50 million from the Export-Import Bank and very generous tax breaks. In 2014, United Technologies gave its former chief executive Louis Chenevert a golden parachute worth more than $172 million. Last year, the company’s five highest-paid executives made more than $50 million. The firm also spent $12 billion to inflate its stock price instead of using that money to invest in new plants and workers.

We need to re-instill an ethic of corporate patriotism. We need to send a very loud and clear message to corporate America: The era of outsourcing is over. Instead of offshoring jobs, the time has come for you to start bringing good-paying jobs back to America.

If United Technologies or any other company wants to keep outsourcing decent-paying American jobs, those companies must pay an outsourcing tax equal to the amount of money it expects to save by moving factories to Mexico or other low-wage countries.  They should not receive federal contracts or other forms of corporate welfare.  They must pay back all of the tax breaks and other corporate welfare they have received from the federal government. And they must not be allowed to reward their executives with stock options, bonuses or golden parachutes for outsourcing jobs to low-wage countries. I will soon be introducing the Outsourcing Prevention Act, which will address exactly that.

If Donald Trump won’t stand up for America’s working class, we must.
Does that sound like a company that deserves more corporate welfare from our government? Trump’s Band-Aid solution is only making the problem of wealth inequality in America even worse.

I said I would work with Trump if he was serious about the promises he made to members of the working class. But after running a campaign pledging to be tough on corporate America, Trump has hypocritically decided to do the exact opposite. He wants to treat corporate irresponsibility with kid gloves. The problem with our rigged economy is not that our policies have been too tough on corporations; it’s that we haven’t been tough enough.

(Bernie Sanders Guest Opinion --WP)

An old man, who has never really worked a single day of his hippy life, is lecturing a multi-millionaire (billionaire, maybe) businessman on how to deal with businesses.

Where were these scathing editorials when Obama let numerous companies leave without a fight?!
a

Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: President Trump
« Reply #127 on: December 01, 2016, 09:48:57 AM »
AP - The Latest: Trump to meet Dem Sen. Heitkamp of North Dakota

Looking to re-route the pipeline? THAT would throw the liberals into a true shit fit. Would love to see how they'd spin that!
a

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #128 on: December 01, 2016, 10:13:35 AM »
An old man, who has never really worked a single day of his hippy life, is lecturing a multi-millionaire (billionaire, maybe) businessman on how to deal with businesses.

Where were these scathing editorials when Obama let numerous companies leave without a fight?!

Yeah, sorry to say, but that's a damn good point.  Why hasn't Bernie been on a nonstop attack against Bitchly for the past eight years?  Why did he pull punches all the way through his campaign, instead of fighting for what he claims to believe in?  He should know that if he'd done these things, then not only would he have beaten Hillary, but he'd be much more convincing when he takes to the pulpit.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #129 on: December 01, 2016, 11:34:52 AM »
Don't waste time on stuff like this, Sessions.  Huge mistake to even consider it.  You have much bigger fish to fry -- real work.



Trump’s anti-pot attorney general choice rattles legal marijuana movement

DENVER – Legal pot's future is in a haze, thanks to President-elect Trump's nomination of a staunchly anti-marijuana lawmaker for attorney general.

“Good people don't smoke marijuana," said Alabama Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions in an April Senate hearing.

That view from the nation's incoming top cop, a sharply different tone than President Obama's, has cast a pall over an industry that's recently celebrated a watershed moment. Voters in eight states relaxed their marijuana laws on Nov. 8, raising to 29 the states that now permit medical use of marijuana, and eight with legal recreational laws on the books.

Marijuana opponents are energized by Sessions' nomination, saying the federal government could easily reverse the national trend toward legalization.

“The point is that it's a new day for marijuana policy,” said Kevin Sabet, president of the anti-legalization Smart Approaches to Marijuana group. “All options are on the table — something unthinkable three weeks ago.”

Legal pot's shaky legal ground adds to the uncertainty. While more states loosen restrictions, marijuana remains illegal at the federal level, preventing its sale across state lines and limiting businesses from opening bank accounts.

Marijuana-industry workers say a change in attitude at the top of government would quickly trickle down. A few high-profile raids by the DEA would likely dissuade many of those who are today publicly selling cannabis.



Many marijuana business owners are wary of drawing Trump's ire, and are "proceeding with caution," said Nate Bradley, the executive director of the California Cannabis Industry Association. Yet advocates for legal marijuana also are hopeful that the views of Trump, who has supported states' rights to establish their own marijuana policies, will outweigh those of Sessions.

“We would expect appointees who serve at the pleasure of the president to stick to the president’s position on this subject. It would certainly be controversial if Sen. Sessions completely defied the president who appointed him,” said Mason Tvert, a spokesman for the pro-legalization Marijuana Policy Project.

For states with legal pot, there are jobs and tax revenue at stake.

In all the recreational states – Colorado, Alaska, Oregon, Washington, California, Massachusetts, Maine and Nevada – buyers must pay taxes on their marijuana purchases. California alone is expected to have a marijuana marketplace worth $7.6 billion by 2020, according to industry analysts New Frontier Data and ArcView Market Research.



Today, marijuana dealers feel largely protected by the Cole Memo, a Justice Department letter establishing under what circumstances federal law enforcement would step in. Generally speaking, the Cole Memo says the federal government will ignore marijuana businesses working in states with strong regulatory systems that take steps to keep pot out of the hands of kids, and prevent drug cartels from profiting. But that 2013 memo also specifically says prosecutors retain the discretion to target the marijuana industry if there’s a “strong federal interest.”

Congress has also prohibited the Justice Department from using federal money to interfere with medical marijuana patients in states where it’s been approved.

President Obama told Rolling Stone that he believes marijuana should be treated as a public health issue, similar to alcohol or tobacco, and called the growing patchwork of state laws "untenable" from a federal perspective, because there's such a disparity across state borders. Some marijuana advocates remain bitterly disappointed Obama didn't do more to push the DEA to classify cannabis as something other than a Schedule 1 controlled substance.

Industry analysts say it’s unlikely Trump will make dramatic changes to marijuana enforcement, given the repeated choices made by voters and the economic impact the industry has. But they're also unsure, given the president-elect's propensity for changing his mind or significantly rolling back campaign promises.

“You had Donald Trump running on a slogan of ‘Make America Great Again,’ bringing back jobs and economic opportunities, and as one of its first acts (the Trump administration) tries to dismantle one of the fastest growing economic opportunities in the country?” asked John Kagia, New Frontier’s executive vice president for industry analytics. “I think they’re going to be walking gingerly here. The likelihood of federal agents effectively shutting down the adult use industry … in our humble opinion, is unlikely.”

(USAToday)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #130 on: December 01, 2016, 04:18:12 PM »
I'm so glad your butt no longer hurts, Mr. Speedfreak.  Maybe you can STFU now.



Ryan on Trump: 'We're not looking back'

Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Ohio) says he and President-elect Donald Trump are on good terms now and talk almost daily.

"We're fine. We're not looking back. We're looking forward," Ryan said during an excerpt of a "60 Minutes" interview released Thursday.

"We speak about every day. And it's not about looking ... back in the past. That's behind us. We're way beyond that."

When asked if he thought Trump could be nominated, Ryan said he "didn't see this one coming."

"He knows that," Ryan said, calling Trump "a very unconventional candidate."

"He's going to be an unconventional president," Ryan continued, likening Trump to a "get-things-done kinda guy."

Ryan said weeks before the election that he would no longer campaign for Trump or defend the businessman in the wake of an "Access Hollywood" tape of Trump making sexually aggressive comments about women in 2005.

Trump responded by attacking the Speaker at the time on Twitter, saying Ryan was a man who "doesn't know how to win."

The pair quickly moved to patch up their relationship in public following Trump's surprise win Nov. 8, which came as Republicans maintained their majorities in the House and Senate.

Ryan said during the CBS interview airing Sunday that he's talked with the president-elect about the Constitution and separation of powers.

"He feels very strongly, actually, that, under President Obama's watch, he stripped a lot of power away from the Constitution, away from the legislative branch of government," Ryan said.

"And we want to reset the balance of power, so that people and the Constitution are rightfully restored."

(The Hill)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #131 on: December 01, 2016, 04:27:01 PM »
Trump freezes Stein's recount efforts in Michigan

President-elect Trump's attorneys filed an objection with the Michigan Bureau of Elections on Thursday in protest of ballot recount efforts.

The move will suspend progress by Green Party presidential nominee Jill Stein to have the ballots recounted. Stein's team wrote in its complaint that the voting machines were flawed.

"All available evidence suggests that the 2016 general election was not tainted by fraud or mistake," Trump's complaint states, adding that Stein has not provided sufficient evidence to back her allegation.

The recount had been slated to begin on Friday, and as long as Trump's complaint is not adopted by the board, it will continue.



Stein responded on Thursday to Trump, calling his refusal to cooperate "outrageous."

"The recount in Michigan, which has been driven by an outpouring of grassroots support in the state — will go forward," Stein said in a statement. "The Michigan Board of State Canvassers and Director of Elections has been a model of professionalism in moving this recount forward in an efficient, transparent manner. Yet the Trump campaign's cynical efforts to delay the recount and create unnecessary costs for taxpayers are shameful and outrageous."

(A Washington Examiner Article)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #132 on: December 01, 2016, 05:27:16 PM »

Kellyanne Conway sits with Robbie Mook, shortly before he melts down.

Shouting match erupts between Clinton and Trump aides

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — The raw, lingering emotion of the 2016 presidential campaign erupted into a shouting match here Thursday as top strategists of Hillary Clinton’s campaign accused their Republican counterparts of fueling and legitimizing racism to elect Donald Trump.

The extraordinary exchange came at a postmortem session sponsored by Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, where top operatives from both campaigns sat across a conference table from each other.

As Trump’s team basked in the glow of its victory and singled out for praise its campaign’s chief executive, Stephen K. Bannon, who was absent, the row of grim-faced Clinton aides who sat opposite them bristled.

Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri condemned Bannon, who previously ran Breitbart, a news site popular with the alt-right, a small movement known for espousing racist views.

“If providing a platform for white supremacists makes me a brilliant tactician, I am proud to have lost,” she said. “I would rather lose than win the way you guys did."

Kellyanne Conway, Trump’s campaign manager, fumed: “Do you think I ran a campaign where white supremacists had a platform?”

“You did, Kellyanne. You did,” interjected Palmieri, who choked up at various points of the session.

“Do you think you could have just had a decent message for white, working-class voters?” Conway continued. “How about, it’s Hillary Clinton, she doesn’t connect with people? How about, they have nothing in common with her? How about, she doesn’t have an economic message?”

Joel Benenson, Clinton’s chief strategist, piled on: “There were dog whistles sent out to people.. . .Look at your rallies. He delivered it.”

At which point, Conway accused Clinton’s team of being sore losers.

“Guys, I can tell you are angry, but wow,” she said. “Hashtag he’s your president. How’s that? Will you ever accept the election results? Will you tell your protesters that he’s their president, too?”

More: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/shouting-match-erupts-between-clinton-and-trump-aides/2016/12/01/7ac4398e-b7ea-11e6-b8df-600bd9d38a02_story.html?utm_term=.0d60aac9c188

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #133 on: December 01, 2016, 05:42:08 PM »
Funny that WSJ refers to Trump "arm-twisting" Carrier.

Thin Lizzy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18452
  • It’s all a fraud
Re: President Trump
« Reply #134 on: December 01, 2016, 05:50:54 PM »
Brutal owning of Martha Raddatz during Trump's speech. She won't recover 8)



Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #135 on: December 02, 2016, 12:27:08 PM »


CNN apologizes for producer’s ‘inappropriate’ joke about Trump’s plane

CNN is apologizing after one of its producers joked on Thursday that President-elect Donald Trump’s plane “crashed.”

Moments before going on air, reporter Suzanne Malveaux was coordinating with producers to make sure all was a go for the live hit: making sure she had water and her microphone was working and figuring out which topics to speak about. All of this was happening in Indianapolis before Trump’s plane landed on his way to visit the local Carrier factory and later hold a rally in Cincinnati.

The producer told Malveaux she would give a signal if Trump’s plane happened to land during the live hit. She then apparently gave one more signal, but that didn’t fly with the CNN bosses.

“That means his plane’s crashed,” the producer is heard saying in the video, which was obtained by FTVLive.com. “Just kidding,” the same producer then adds.

The comment prompted an awkward reaction from Malveaux, whose eyes immediately opened wide. The reporter then laughed off the unseemly joke.

On Friday, CNN released a statement regarding the “inappropriate” comment made by one of its producers, who was not identified.

(The Blaze)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #136 on: December 02, 2016, 12:29:53 PM »
Brutal owning of Martha Raddatz during Trump's speech. She won't recover 8)




The woman is awful.  Everything wrong with the media can be found in her.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #137 on: December 02, 2016, 12:38:56 PM »


Trump Spokeswoman: Hillary May Still be Prosecuted

Incoming administration ‘may look at that again’

Speaking with ABC News, Conway told George Stephanopolous that some Trump administration officials may still want to re-examine the former Secretary of State’s mishandling of classified emails.

“You talk about the bruising campaign, it seemed to continue last night in Cincinnatti. You had that crowd chanting, ‘Lock her up! Lock her up!’” Stephanopolous said.

“That’s the way they feel, and there will be officials who are in charge of such things in the Trump administration who may look at that again,” Conway stated, adding that Trump last week said he was looking beyond Clinton and focusing on a succsessful transition.

“Wait, so you’re suggesting now that the Trump administration may actually pursue prosecution?” Stephanopolous asked.

Reiterating Trump’s statements to the New York Times last week, Conway argued, “No, I’m not suggesting that at all. That would be something I would not be able to say.”

But Conway went on to add: “Of course, the Dept. of Justice, the different committees, the FBI perhaps can take a different look, but nobody expects that. No one is talking about that right now.”

The Trump team stirred controversy last week when Conway stated Trump had no formal plans of pursuing charges against Clinton, and instead wanted her to “heal.”

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #138 on: December 02, 2016, 01:20:31 PM »
Green Beret war hero accuses Trump pick Gen. James Mattis of 'LEAVING MY MEN TO DIE'

A Green Beret war hero says that Donald Trump’s Defense Secretary pick James Mattis left his men to die after they were hit by friendly fire in Afghanistan.



Retired Lt. Col. Jason Amerine was in charge of U.S. special forces protecting future Afghan president Hamid Karzai when his troops were hit by friendly fire on December 5, 2001.

Three American soldiers and dozens of Afghanis died after being hit by a U.S. smart bomb, though help from other military units came late because the closest forces, Mattis’s Marine contingent, were not sent.

“He was indecisive and betrayed his duty to us, leaving my men to die during the golden hour when he could have reached us,” Amerine said in a Facebook post Friday morning.

Mattis, who was 45 minutes away at Camp Rhino, repeatedly refused requests to send rescue helicopters, unidentified sources told NBC News, which first reported on Amerine’s Friday comments.

War journalist Eric Blehm, who wrote about this incident in “The Only Thing Worth Dying For,” told the network that a special forces sergeant who disagreed with Mattis was thrown out of his office.

Air Force helicopters based three hours away in Pakistan ultimately took the wounded to Camp Rhino.

Sgt. Jefferson Donald Davis, 39, and 32-year-old Sgt. Daniel Henry Petithory, 32, were both killed instantly, though Amerine says that Sgt. Brian Cody Prosser, 28, died around the time they reached the base.

He said that two Afghans are also believed to have died because of the delay in help, though no formal investigation has ever looked into exactly what happened or whether deaths could have been prevented by a more rapid rescue.

Amerine, who made headlines for whitleblowing to Congress about U.S. hostage policy before retiring last year, said that Mattis may have been a good general during later assignments in Iraq.

However, he addd hat it has been “bizarre” seeing the 2001 incident debated now and said that praise given to Mattis amounts to a “revisionist history of the man who left us to die.”

Mattis has not commented on the 2001 friendly fire deaths or his response to it.

(NYDN)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #139 on: December 02, 2016, 01:36:25 PM »
Trump treasury secretary pick Steven Mnuchin’s bank foreclosed on 90-year-old woman who owed 27 cents

A bank owned by Steven Mnuchin, Donald Trump's Treasury secretary nominee, foreclosed on a 90-year-old Florida woman who owed 27 cents, reports revealed Thursday.

The practices of OneWest Bank have received renewed scrutiny since the Republican president-elect announced the onetime Goldman Sachs banker as his pick Wednesday. Over 36,000 foreclosures followed Mnuchin and partners’ purchase of failed bank IndyMac in 2009, according to the California Reinvestment Coalition.

“In essence what they did is they bought a foreclosure machine,” Kevin Stein, the housing advocacy group's deputy director, told National Public Radio.

An 86-year-old California man told the radio station that OneWest refused to modify the home equity loan on him and his wife’s longtime home even though they qualified three times for a government-backed modification. The bank sold their home of 50 years in 2011.

Outcry over OneWest's foreclosures drew over 100 sign-waving and chanting protesters to Mnuchin’s $26 million family mansion in Bel Air that year. He later said he had been subjected to “public ire” in a divorce filing asking that the address be kept completely private.


Goofy, Hell-Bound "Banker"

The Florida woman, Ossie Lofton, found herself facing a foreclosure by OneWest in 2014 after confusion about payments on her reverse mortgage, according to court papers obtained by Politico. Lofton sent a check for $423 in response to a bill for $423.30, the documents showed.

The OneWest subsidiary responded by billing the Lakeland resident for $0.30, but Lofton sent a check back for only $0.03. A nonprofit firm called Florida Rural Legal Services challenged the foreclosure in Polk County Circuit Court in October, Lofton’s lawyers told Politico.

“I don’t know that they’re the worst, but I certainly think it’s criminal the way these servicers are treating elderly homeowners,” attorney Lynn Drysdale said.

Representatives for Trump’s transition team and the bank that acquired OneWest last year, CIT Bank, didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment Thursday night.

(NYDN)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #140 on: December 02, 2016, 01:55:36 PM »

El Stupido

New California AG Becerra Dares Donald Trump: ‘Come at Us’

Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-CA), who was nominated Thursday to be California’s new attorney general, issued a forceful challenge to President-elect Donald Trump over his pledge to enforce federal immigration law: “Come at us.”

Becerra, who has yet to be confirmed by the state legislature, and whose membership in the State Bar has been inactive for more than two decades, did his best impression of segregationist Democrat George Wallace in defying federal authority.

Claiming to “know the true value of diversity,” Becerra told reporters on a conference call, as quoted by The Recorder: “If you want to take on a forward-leaning state that is prepared to defend its rights and interests, come at us.”

California Democrats are enthusiastic about Becerra, who will be the state’s first Latino attorney general, and will replace Kamala Harris, who was just elected to the U.S. Senate to replace outgoing Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA). Becerra is also the outgoing chair of the House Democratic Caucus and the highest-ranking Latino in the House of Representatives. He is a passionate, and highly partisan, advocate for Democratic Party policies — including, lately, amnesty for illegal aliens.

President-elect Trump has promised to enforce federal immigration law, and to end the practice of “sanctuary cities” — of which California has several — in which local law enforcement refuse to cooperate with federal immigration officials without a warrant or court order. The policy has resulted in illegal aliens, including violent felons and repeat deportees, remaining in the United States. Big-city Democrat mayors across the state and throughout the country have vowed, Wallace-style, to resist.

However, there is no legal basis for sanctuary cities. Ironically, a 2012 Supreme Court decision striking down Arizona’s aggressive SB 1070 immigration law provides the basis for their undoing, ruling that immigration law is an area of exclusive federal jurisdiction. The same principle would likely be applied by the Trump administration against a “rebel California.”

Aside from the courts, as Breitbart News’ Chriss Street has pointed out, a Trump administration could also exert leverage by withholding federal funds from California. The state is uniquely vulnerable, given its dependence on federal expenditures.

Nevertheless, Becerra and his Democrats are spoiling for a fight. And Donald Trump seems inclined to give it to them.

(Breitbart)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #141 on: December 02, 2016, 02:21:32 PM »
CENSORSHIP: The Reddit Saga Continues

The social media site Reddit.com, which has hundreds of millions of users, has begun censoring one the site’s most active communities: supporters of President-elect Donald Trump.

The trouble began over the Thanksgiving holiday when Reddit’s CEO, Steve Huffman, secretly used his administrative access to the site to alter angry comments directed at him – changing the text of the comments to make them appear directed at Trump supporters on the site instead.

After an uproar, Huffman admitted doing that and said “as the CEO, I shouldn’t play such games, and it’s all fixed now… I most assuredly won’t do this again.”

But Wednesday, while issuing a further apology, Huffman announced that due to some “toxic” users, he would begin to censor all posts in a pro-Trump section of the site (called “r/The_Donald”) by limiting the ability of posts there to reach what many consider the “front page” of Reddit – where the posts get seen by a wider audience.


Extra Weak, with a Twist of Fruit: Steve Huffman

Huffman added: “We have identified hundreds of the most toxic users and are taking action against them, ranging from warnings to timeouts to permanent bans.”

Reddit’s “r/The_Donald” community has more than 300,000 users, who are known for being both enthusiastic and irreverent. In July, Donald Trump visited the page and answered fans’ questions there.

Reddit and the company that owns it, Advance Publications, did not respond to requests for comment.

Huffman also hinted that he may further target the Trump section of Reddit. Responding to a question Thursday about whether the new limits impacted anyone besides the “r/The_Donald” community, he replied, “Right now, just them… Going forward, we'll just take away their toys specifically and move on.”

Many Reddit users welcomed their CEO’s crackdown on the Trump section, with some saying he should go further.

“’The_donald’ is not something that should be on Reddit… It should be banned, along with all its members,” user “Tyler_Vakarian” wrote.

The volunteer moderators who support and run the Trump section of Reddit told FoxNews.com through a spokesperson (user “PrinceCamelton”) that they were not surprised by the censorship given censorship by other social media CEOs such as Twitter’s Jack Dorsey – but were surprised that Huffman had not apologized to the users of r/The_Donald for using his administrative access to falsely direct angry comments towards them.

“Huffman has not directly issued our community an apology. Instead, he has the audacity to call us ‘toxic.’ They are trying to control and push the radical left-wing narrative that our country has turned away by electing Mr. Trump.”

The moderators added that their section of Reddit does not allow either hateful comments or harassment.

“We are not a toxic community. Huffman is trying to frame us as a community that harbors harassment. This couldn't be any further from the truth. We have let our community know multiple times that we do not support harassment. We've even been complimented by the Staff Coordinator of Reddit,” moderators from “r/The_Donald” told FoxNews.com in an emailed statement.

The moderators said that despite the limits imposed on them, they will continue spreading their pro-Trump message on the site as long as they are allowed to.

“We live in a phenomenal information age that makes it so easy to pass on information. Do not allow these radical leftists push you around. Stand up for what you believe in.”

(foxnews)

mazrim

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4438
Re: President Trump
« Reply #142 on: December 02, 2016, 04:18:35 PM »

El Stupido

New California AG Becerra Dares Donald Trump: ‘Come at Us’

Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-CA), who was nominated Thursday to be California’s new attorney general, issued a forceful challenge to President-elect Donald Trump over his pledge to enforce federal immigration law: “Come at us.”

Becerra, who has yet to be confirmed by the state legislature, and whose membership in the State Bar has been inactive for more than two decades, did his best impression of segregationist Democrat George Wallace in defying federal authority.

Claiming to “know the true value of diversity,” Becerra told reporters on a conference call, as quoted by The Recorder: “If you want to take on a forward-leaning state that is prepared to defend its rights and interests, come at us.”

California Democrats are enthusiastic about Becerra, who will be the state’s first Latino attorney general, and will replace Kamala Harris, who was just elected to the U.S. Senate to replace outgoing Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA). Becerra is also the outgoing chair of the House Democratic Caucus and the highest-ranking Latino in the House of Representatives. He is a passionate, and highly partisan, advocate for Democratic Party policies — including, lately, amnesty for illegal aliens.

President-elect Trump has promised to enforce federal immigration law, and to end the practice of “sanctuary cities” — of which California has several — in which local law enforcement refuse to cooperate with federal immigration officials without a warrant or court order. The policy has resulted in illegal aliens, including violent felons and repeat deportees, remaining in the United States. Big-city Democrat mayors across the state and throughout the country have vowed, Wallace-style, to resist.

However, there is no legal basis for sanctuary cities. Ironically, a 2012 Supreme Court decision striking down Arizona’s aggressive SB 1070 immigration law provides the basis for their undoing, ruling that immigration law is an area of exclusive federal jurisdiction. The same principle would likely be applied by the Trump administration against a “rebel California.”

Aside from the courts, as Breitbart News’ Chriss Street has pointed out, a Trump administration could also exert leverage by withholding federal funds from California. The state is uniquely vulnerable, given its dependence on federal expenditures.

Nevertheless, Becerra and his Democrats are spoiling for a fight. And Donald Trump seems inclined to give it to them.

(Breitbart)
You would think that these types of things would be from the Onion or something its so laughable but scary that it is true. Issuing a forceful reply to your president to not enforce the law......That doesn't seem right, lol.

Sounds like a confederacy or something.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #143 on: December 02, 2016, 04:41:10 PM »
You would think that these types of things would be from the Onion or something its so laughable but scary that it is true. Issuing a forceful reply to your president to not enforce the law......That doesn't seem right, lol.

Sounds like a confederacy or something.

Yeah, I agree.  It has potential to be a very interesting fight, IMO, and this guy should stfu... because he may get his ass owned.

Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: President Trump
« Reply #144 on: December 03, 2016, 08:34:04 AM »
So we can deport all the illegals to California and cut ALL federal funding? Okay. Sounds good to me.
a

mass243

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12873
  • On right side of the history!
Re: President Trump
« Reply #145 on: December 03, 2016, 10:13:46 AM »

Trump talked on phone with Taiwan president (Musclecenter?) which pissed off China  8)





Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: President Trump
« Reply #146 on: December 03, 2016, 12:36:54 PM »
Trump talked on phone with Taiwan president (Musclecenter?) which pissed off China  8)






And now the liberal media is upset that Trump spoke with a democratically elected official because it may upset the Communist country China....
a

mass243

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12873
  • On right side of the history!
Re: President Trump
« Reply #147 on: December 03, 2016, 12:44:27 PM »
And now the liberal media is upset that Trump spoke with a democratically elected official because it may upset the Communist country China....

Yes, I was wondering wtf.

Didn't even know you had some kind of agreement with China not to talk with Taiwanese.
Taiwan army is supplied by USA.
Oubama met with Dalai Lama who advocates free Tibet and opposes China.

What is the purpose of that no-talk agreement?



calfzilla

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20790
  • YUMAN FILTH!
Re: President Trump
« Reply #148 on: December 03, 2016, 04:25:05 PM »
Who gives a fuck about China, we will talk with whoever we want.

polychronopolous

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: President Trump
« Reply #149 on: December 03, 2016, 04:45:45 PM »
Yes, I was wondering wtf.

Didn't even know you had some kind of agreement with China not to talk with Taiwanese.
Taiwan army is supplied by USA.
Oubama met with Dalai Lama who advocates free Tibet and opposes China.

What is the purpose of that no-talk agreement?




At first glance it seems Trump is trying to warm up with Putin and Russia in order to create leverage versus China and their economic interests.