Author Topic: President Trump  (Read 94185 times)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #325 on: December 15, 2016, 08:57:25 AM »


Palantir CEO at Trump-tech summit raises red flags

As top executives from the world's biggest technology companies paraded through Trump Tower for a meeting with the president-elect, one particular participant stood out: Alex Karp.

Unlike the other attendees, like Apple CEO Tim Cook, Amazon.com CEO Jeff Bezos and Alphabet CEO Larry Page, who oversee companies worth hundreds of billions of dollars, Karp runs a privately held business valued at $20 billion, one that's hardly known outside of Silicon Valley and Washington.

Karp's company is Palantir Technologies, a Palo Alto, California-based software developer that's backed by the CIA's venture arm and has done work for government agencies including the FBI, the Pentagon and IRS.

Given how much smaller Palantir is than the other companies represented, why was Karp invited to meet with Donald Trump?

The most obvious reason contains little subtlety. Peter Thiel, the venture capitalist and Facebook board member who is part of Trump's transition team, is a co-founder of Palantir and is the company's biggest backer.

Karp's presence may or may not represent an actual conflict of interest, but the appearance of one is hard to deny, according to Norman Eisen, a former U.S. ambassador to the Czech Republic who worked on President Barack Obama's ethics initiatives.

 "It raises profound questions as to whether there has been the use of the transition to try to enhance the profile and value of Mr. Thiel's company," Eisen said. "For a campaign that ran on `drain the swamp,' it seems to me like they just threw another alligator in the swamp."

A spokesperson for Thiel, who is a partner at San Francisco-based venture firm Founders Fund, didn't respond to a request for comment. Representatives of Palantir and the Trump transition also didn't respond.

(CNBC)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #326 on: December 15, 2016, 09:01:42 AM »
Take Two: McMorris out, Zinke in.



Trump taps Rep. Ryan Zinke to head Interior Department

(Washington Times) President-elect Donald Trump on Thursday officially tapped Rep. Ryan Zinke of Montana to head the Interior Department, finalizing a team that will be tasked with rolling back much of President Obama’s environmental agenda.

The pick — which came as something of a surprise after widespread reports that Mr. Trump would choose Washington Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers as Interior secretary — underscores the incoming administration’s desire to ramp up domestic oil, gas, and coal production.

Mr. Zinke “has incredible leadership skills and an attitude of doing whatever it takes to win. America is the most beautiful country in the world and he is going to help keep it that way with smart management of our federal lands,” Mr. Trump said in a statement. “At the same time, my administration’s goal is to repeal bad regulations and use our natural resources to create jobs and wealth for the American people, and Ryan will explore every possibility for how we can safely and responsibly do that.”

If confirmed, Mr. Zinke would oversee a vast portfolio that includes more than 500 million acres, including America’s national parks and monuments, and energy exploration on federal land. The Interior secretary also is the key government liaison with Native American tribes.

Mr. Zinke also is the latest in a trend of Interior secretaries hailing from Western states. President Obama’s first Interior secretary, Ken Salazar, previously served as a U.S. senator from Colorado. Mr. Salazar was replaced by Sally Jewell, the former CEO of leading outdoor company REI.

In his own statement, Mr. Zinke took shots at his predecessors and vowed to make the Interior Department “great again,” a spin on Mr. Trump’s famous campaign slogan.

(Washington Times)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #327 on: December 15, 2016, 09:33:43 AM »
Hmm, maybe THIS explains why Trump's posse looks just like we'd expect from JEB BUSH or MARCO RUBIO.


Priebus Manhandles, Owns Trump?

Reince Priebus Is Dominating The Trump Transition

(Daily Caller) Republican National Committee (RNC) chairman Reince Priebus is in control of most of the hiring decisions for President-elect Donald Trump, according to a Wednesday report from Politico.

Trump loyalists who have been with the campaign since the beginning clashed with Priebus, who is a recent establishment addition to the Trump transition team as his future chief of staff.

Former executive chairman of Breitbart, Steve Bannon, and campaign manager Kellyanne Conway fielded their pick for the next head of the RNC. Priebus had other plans, and ultimately prevailed when Trump officially named Ronna Romney McDaniel to the top post over Nick Ayers, the Bannon favorite.

Priebus also reportedly tried to get Conway to commit to staying on with the Trump White House, a move Conway immediately rejected, adding that Priebus “doesn’t speak for me.”  Trump insiders told Politico that Trump seemed taken aback by the severity of Conway’s response, turning to Priebus to say, “She’s tough.”

Priebus allies rejected the idea that he is stocking the office with people loyal to the establishment, adding that Priebus reached out to former Trump campaign loyalists to assure them they would be discussed for positions in the administration.

(Daily Caller)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #328 on: December 15, 2016, 09:42:51 AM »
Quote
In 1987, Politico reported this week, former president Richard Nixon wrote a brief letter to future president Donald Trump. “Mrs. Nixon told me that you were great on the Donahue Show,” Nixon wrote. “As you can imagine, she is an expert on politics and she predicts that whenever you decide to run for office you will be a winner!” The letter will be displayed in the Oval Office.

(Interesting little blip, by way of WP)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #329 on: December 15, 2016, 10:20:11 AM »
Lmao, OK.  Now they're taking Step One, by making this claim.  Reported by HuffersPost.

Quote
American intelligence agencies have told the White House they now have “high confidence” that the Russian government was behind the theft of emails and documents from the Democratic National Committee, according to federal officials who have been briefed on the evidence.

But intelligence officials have cautioned that they are uncertain whether the electronic break-in at the committee’s computer systems was intended as fairly routine cyberespionage — of the kind the United States also conducts around the world — or as part of an effort to manipulate the 2016 presidential election.

Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: President Trump
« Reply #330 on: December 15, 2016, 10:30:40 AM »
HAHAHAHA!!!! That's great.

"We don't know what we don't know..."

Also, I didn't know Seth Rich was Russian  ::)
a

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #331 on: December 15, 2016, 10:58:33 AM »
When they say something like this, I'd want to come back down on the dude's head with a hammer (so to speak) if he didn't back it up in reasonably short order.

Quote
White House spokesman Josh Earnest said there’s “ample evidence” Trump was “obviously aware” Russia was involved in helping him win.

But even then, you can see what a gap exists between what they CLAIM to "know" and what they want us to believe.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #332 on: December 15, 2016, 12:02:39 PM »
Aww... it's the "feel-good story" of the decade.  ::)



Trump Supporter and the Protester He Punched Hug It Out

One of the early violent moments in the tense 2016 presidential campaign came to a close this week with a handshake and a hug.

John Franklin McGraw, who punched a protester at a Donald Trump rally in Fayetteville, N.C. in March, apologized for his actions when he faced Rakeem Jones, the man he hit, in court on Wednesday, the Washington Post reports. After McGraw was sentenced, the two men shook hands and hugged, prompting the courtroom to break into applause.

The 79-year-old pleaded no contest to misdemeanor charges of assault and battery and disorderly conduct, for which a judge gave him a 30-day suspended sentence and 12 months of unsupervised probation, according to the Associated Press. He will also have to pay a $250 fine and $180 in court costs, the AP reported.

(AP)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #333 on: December 15, 2016, 12:32:48 PM »


Conway 'just kidding' about Trump working on 'Celebrity Apprentice'

Kellyanne Conway said Thursday she was joking when she said President-elect Donald Trump would work on the "The Celebrity Apprentice" in his spare time.

"I was kidding, OK? Any free time he has, he works. He works. I promise," the top Trump aide said to reporters at Trump Tower.

The president-elect will retain an executive producer credit for the reality show after taking office.

Conway suggested to CNN last week that Trump would work on the show in his "spare time." “I mean, presidents have a right to do things in their spare time or their leisure time. I mean, nobody objects to that," she said.
 
But Trump followed up on Twitter, saying his involvement will be nothing more than a title.
 
“I have NOTHING to do with The Apprentice except for fact that I conceived it with Mark B & have a big stake in it. Will devote ZERO TIME!” he wrote Saturday.
 
Variety reported last Thursday that Trump's executive producer credit will likely garner him a low five-figure fee per episode, which will be paid by the production company, MGM, rather than by NBC.
 
The show is set to return on Jan. 2 after a two-year hiatus with new host Arnold Schwarzenegger.

(The Hill)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #334 on: December 15, 2016, 12:53:59 PM »
This story will develop to whatever point that it will, and it'll probably do it quickly... but ATM this thing, here:

Quote
White House spokesman Josh Earnest said there’s “ample evidence” Trump was “obviously aware” Russia was involved in helping him win.

looks to be about nothing but Trump's comments that day during the race (which we've all heard).

WH goes on to say:

Quote
"I don't know if it was a staff meeting or if he had access to a briefing or he was just basing his assessment on a large number of published reports, but Mr. Trump obviously knew that Russia was engaged in malicious cyberactivity that was helping him and hurting Hillary Clinton's campaign," Earnest said.

SO TAKE YOUR STAND -- A REAL ONE -- OR STFU.  THE ONLY ONE PLAYING WITH ELECTION ATM IS YOU.

mazrim

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4438
Re: President Trump
« Reply #335 on: December 15, 2016, 12:58:02 PM »
Don't know why "conservative" talk show hosts are giving this story the time of day. Giving it waaaay too much coverage for it essentially being about nothing. Not really worth the time to refute it.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #336 on: December 15, 2016, 01:04:34 PM »
Don't know why "conservative" talk show hosts are giving this story the time of day. Giving it waaaay too much coverage for it essentially being about nothing. Not really worth the time to refute it.

Yes, especially since they want to remain vague as to not give anyone anything to fight.

But they're doing a smashing job convincing those pathetic cases who wanted Hillary in office, and who now believe the sky is falling.

The same ppl, of course, who DID NOT UTTER A PEEP when Obama was caught on camera asking to "wait until the election when I have flexibility" or very similar.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #337 on: December 15, 2016, 01:28:59 PM »


Sylvester Stallone could get a job in the Trump administration

Sylvester Stallone may be joining the Trump administration.

Stallone, 70, could be up for chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts, The Daily Mail reports.

“It’s been widely and wrongly assumed that a Trump presidency will be hostile to the arts,” a source tells the paper.

“But Mr. Trump feels this sort of A-list appointment is precisely the shot in the arm that the industry needs,” the source added.

Stallone, best known for his roles in the “Rocky” and “Rambo” movie franchises, publicly praised Trump’s run for president in January.

“I love Donald Trump,” the actor told Variety.

“He’s a great Dickensian character. You know what I mean? There are certain people like Arnold, Babe Ruth, that are bigger than life. But I don’t know how that translates to running the world,” he said.

A Stallone rep did not respond to a request for comment.

The Trump transition team did not immediately provide a comment.

(NYP)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #338 on: December 15, 2016, 03:01:48 PM »
OK, Megan.   ::)



Megan Mullally on her performance with Trump at 2005 Emmys

When Megan Mullally performed with Donald Trump at the 2005 Emmys, she probably didn't think she was duetting with the future president-elect.

Stephen Colbert invited Mullally to The Late Show Wednesday night and showed her a photo of her and Trump onstage, where they sang a parody of the Green Acres theme song, with Trump dressed as a farmer and Mullally as her Will & Grace character Karen.

"See this photo? (It's) otherwise known as 'my suicide note,'" Mullally said. "I've heard they can be very tricky to write, so this just saves me the trouble."

While Mullally didn't support Trump in the election, she was diplomatic about working with him in the past. "He's an entertainer, you gotta give him that much. You know what I like? He put on an undershirt and held a pitchfork. I have to give him points," she said before adding, "No, I'm not giving him any points for anything."



As Mullally went on to explain, the country was gripped with American Idol fever in 2005, so she and Trump appeared together in a sketch called "Emmy Idol," where pairs of celebrities competed for viewers' votes.

"He really wanted to win it because people were calling in to vote," she said. "We won it... so the next day, I was in my Will & Grace dressing room and the phone rang and it was Donald Trump."

"And he said, 'You know what? We really needed to win that thing and we did. And you were a big part of that, so I just wanted to say that we really needed to win it, and not only did we win it, but I hear we killed them. It was a landslide.'"

(USA Today)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #339 on: December 15, 2016, 04:02:55 PM »
I used to dislike this guy.

GOP rep: 'There is no CIA conclusion’ on Trump

Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) on Thursday disputed reports that the CIA has concluded Russia meddled in the presidential election to help elect Donald Trump.

“Whatever conclusion they want to come up with is one thing,” he told reporters at Trump Tower in New York City. "There is no CIA conclusion. The CIA has repeatedly told us that they have no idea what [Russia’s] intent was.

“If there is an intent, it was to disrupt the election, to create confusion and cast a cloud over the winner,” added King, who endorsed Trump before he became president-elect.

“To me what happened has been disgraceful. This is almost the CIA, people in the intelligence community using disinformation tactics against the president-elect of the United States, and that has been just disgraceful.”

King also rebuked Trump’s critics for trumpeting reports of a CIA assessment linking the president-elect’s White House win with Russian interference.

“This is several days before the Electoral College,” he said, citing Monday’s finalizing vote. "They’re creating this uncertainty over the election. And right now, certain elements of the media and certain elements of the intelligence community and certain politicians are really doing the work of the Russians.

“To suddenly have it appear in the Washington Post and the New York Times that the intelligence community has concluded this. Who? Who in the CIA? Is it [CIA Director] John Brennan? Is it some rogue person behind a desk somewhere?”

(The Hill)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #340 on: December 15, 2016, 04:28:50 PM »
Shut it, liars.  Not quite.



Editor’s Note: How did the pollsters get it so wrong? It’s a question that’s been on many minds since Nov. 9, when Donald Trump was elected the 45th president of the United States. Leading up to Election Day, the grand majority of polls, pollsters and prediction markets had predicted a Clinton presidency.

Economics correspondent Paul Solman posed this question to University of Michigan economist Justin Wolfers, who also writes for the New York Times Upshot, which had predicted that Clinton had an 85 percent chance of winning. For more, tune in to tonight’s Making Sen$e report, which airs every Thursday on the PBS NewsHour. The following conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity and length.

PAUL SOLMAN: So the outcome of the election has been pretty humbling for those of us who follow the prediction markets, no?

JUSTIN WOLFERS: I’d just say it was a little humbling. I don’t want to overstate that case though. Remember the Chicago Cubs were two games behind in the World Series, and betting markets said that there was only a 30 percent to win the World Series. As history now records it, they went on and won the World Series.

Quote
“But, you know, the truth is when the markets tell you something is a one-in-seven chance to happen, it’s going to happen one in seven times.”

Well, betting markets said the same thing about Donald Trump. They said that there’s some chance he could win; he wasn’t the likely candidate by any means. But just as sports history has seen upsets happen, so has political history, and Donald Trump will go down as one of the unlikely candidates who won, perhaps the least likely. But, you know, the truth is when the markets tell you something is a one-in-seven chance to happen, it’s going to happen one in seven times.

SOLMAN: And that’s I think what was so hard for people like myself and you who followed the betting markets to really fully internalize, don’t you think?

WOLFERS: Yeah, so when the market says something has, say, an 83 percent chance of happening, it’s like a lot of people use an internal shorthand — “Well, that’s near enough that I think it’s pretty close to a sure thing.” So markets weren’t telling you it’s not a sure thing; there’s some risk this won’t happen.

Quote
“… so we were surprised, but we should have been no more surprised than we were when the Cubs won the World Series.”

You know, I was surprised the whole time actually that markets weren’t more confident that Clinton would win. They were worried that the polls might not get this right. That something else was going on out there. They pointed to that very real risk, and that very real risk turned out to be something that happened, so we were surprised, but we should have been no more surprised than we were when the Cubs won the World Series.

SOLMAN: Sam Wang of Princeton said there was a 99 percent chance that Clinton would win, and that was days before and right up to the night of the election.

WOLFERS: That’s Sam’s forecast, it’s Sam’s forecasting model; the betting markets told me it was maybe a one-in-six or one-in-seven chance Trump would win. We can’t say after the fact who was right. So the analogy my colleagues at the [New York Times] Upshot would use is this is like a 37-yard field goal. Well, what do we know after the fact? We know the field goal missed. What we don’t know was it a 37-yard field goal attempt, or was it, as Sam Wang would have it, a field goal attempt from right in front of the sticks? All we know at this point is the field goal missed.

SOLMAN: When I first began to think that Donald Trump had a real chance was when the New York Times Upshot made that field goal analogy, and my favorite kicker from my team, the New England Patriots, missed field goals from a shorter distance than the odds were of Donald Trump winning. And at that point, I thought, “Hmm, I’d better realize that this is a possibility.”

More: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/making-sense/pollsters-prediction-markets-get-wrong-economist-justin-wolfers-explains-didnt/

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #341 on: December 15, 2016, 07:06:44 PM »
Last sentence is Pure Platinum.



Now you can get unfriended for not hating Trump enough

(NY Post, Opinion: Karol Markowicz) By now we’ve all heard how the contentious election, and the surprising result, has frayed friendships — especially on social media. Hillary Clinton supporters, angry and dismayed at the result, have chopped Trump-loving friends off their friend lists. But the culling seems to be progressing beyond just active Trump supporters. Now, some people who are insufficiently anti-Trump, even if they didn’t vote for him, are getting the boot.

Dorian Davis, an adjunct professor of media in Washington, DC, has noticed a slide in his friend count because, he suspects, he’s not “critical enough of Trump.”

“If you post anything even remotely critical of Clinton’s campaign, or of this new movement to dump the Electoral College, or point out even one single thing Trump’s done that you like, you get accused in the comment section of aiding and abetting the next Hitler, and before you know it, you’re down a Facebook friend or two,” Davis said.

This, when he openly supported Gary Johnson. “I post about politics all the time, but I’ve never experienced the rate of attrition I have as a result of Trump posts this year,” he added.

Bruce Carroll, a gay conservative activist, says he watched “a gay friend on Facebook systematically unfriend people who weren’t vocally anti-Trump.” It didn’t matter if you voted for the guy or not; now is the time to virtue signal from the rooftops, and if you’re not doing it, you’re out.

K, who prefers to remain anonymous, says she didn’t vote for Trump but lost a longtime friend after making a joke about anti-Trump hysteria in another friend’s comment section.

It’s out of control, and the insanity doesn’t end at cutting off friends for failing to warn that the sky is falling. So many pieces in the media recently proudly showcase people openly losing their minds over the election.

New York magazine wrote about women spontaneously cutting off their hair, allegedly as a response to the election. It was filled with quotes like, “The election results felt like an attack on minorities, women, and marginalized people in general. Having long hair was my attempt to fit into society, so after the election, I felt a need to exert my ‘uniqueness’ and not tie my femininity to the length of my hair.”

The Washington Post had a piece from a woman who lost all will to date post-election. The column is titled “Trump’s election stole my desire to look for a partner.” What takes her story from sad to crazy is that she had met someone great and was dating him, only to cut him off because the election so badly damaged her psyche.

It’s all way too much. Firms are canceling holiday parties, daughters are raging at their Trump-voter parents in public and people are inventing fake hate crimes to send some message no one understands. Trump voters in the Electoral College are even getting death threats.

The outrage is at peak level — and we haven’t even had an inauguration yet.

I was vocally anti-Trump from the moment he descended the escalator, and I wrote against his candidacy frequently. But even for me, the current anti-Trump fever pitch is unsustainable, and it’s time to dial it back.

If you’ve reached the point where you’re cutting off friends who are merely taking a wait-and-see attitude about our next president, even when they didn’t themselves support him, or cutting off your hair to make a point, you’re taking your anguish over the election too far.

A common retort during the election to Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” slogan was “America is already great.” If that’s true, then we can survive any president, even if it’s one you so deeply didn’t want.

Our system is set up to shake off a term or two of even the worst presidents, and we don’t even know yet what kind of president Donald Trump will be. Fight against his policies, when he actually showcases them, but don’t lose your friends, or your mind, in the process.

(NY Post, Opinion: Karol Markowicz)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #342 on: December 16, 2016, 12:27:49 PM »
Lol, OK.  Sure.



The Narcotic of Trump

You would think forcing Mitt Romney to eat frog legs, while swallowing his dignity, would have been enough humiliation during the dinner segment of his failed tryout for secretary of state. You would think.

But the president-elect wanted more. Romney was a “choker,” in Donald Trump’s earlier put-down; that, and he walked “like a penguin.” If Romney could take his flightless bird-in-a-tuxedo-act outside and apologize for calling Trump a fraud, then maybe the job was his. Romney would waddle no further. Apologize? Cripes, the title of his book is “No Apology.”

Still, high-five! For Trump, the debasement of Romney was just another hit of dopamine — the neurotransmitter once called the Kim Kardashian of molecules. He needs a jolt several times a day. But in turn, he gives it back to you, the millions in his personality cult, and certainly the click-bait web and cable press, who need it just as much.

More: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/16/opinion/the-narcotic-of-trump.html?_r=0

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42406
Re: President Trump
« Reply #343 on: December 16, 2016, 12:50:51 PM »
Good read above and quite humorous. Thanks.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #344 on: December 16, 2016, 01:40:28 PM »
Good read above and quite humorous. Thanks.

I really lol'ed at it.

Oh, you are SO owned, Obama.  At 2:00, below (said in October).  Thanks to Thin Lizzy for pointing out the comments on another thread.



Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #345 on: December 16, 2016, 07:15:26 PM »
Reported that FBI now in "agreement" with CIA that Russia "aimed to help" Trump.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42406
Re: President Trump
« Reply #346 on: December 16, 2016, 07:21:52 PM »
Reported that FBI now in "agreement" with CIA that Russia "aimed to help" Trump.

Well that's interesting. Are you sure about this? Next up, did Trump solicit Putin's help or was it truly just Russian interference?

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #347 on: December 16, 2016, 07:50:11 PM »
Well that's interesting. Are you sure about this? Next up, did Trump solicit Putin's help or was it truly just Russian interference?

Yes, it's been reported.  Will sort through it as she blows.   ;D

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #348 on: December 17, 2016, 05:50:05 AM »
ATM, looks to be the point they're angling toward is that Russia didn't want Hillary as CiC.  

Much easier for them to "show" that, I'm sure, compared to giving a direct connection with Trump (but they're undoubtedly trying to find one or more of those, too).

NYTimes, for instance, says the "hacking" is a result of "years of paranoia" against Hillary on the part of the Russians.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #349 on: December 17, 2016, 06:00:01 AM »
Stuff like this is why they want to stop Trump.  He wants to shut-down their little experiment.



Trump slams U.S. interventions, vows to crush ISIS

NEW YORK -- President-elect Donald Trump on Friday continued a tour of the states that won him the White House, departing New York for a rally in Orlando, Fla.

"For too long, we've [been] moving from one reckless intervention to another, to countries you've never heard of before," Trump said at the rally in Orlando, referring to U.S. foreign policy. "It's crazy and it's going to stop."

Trump again vowed to defeat the Islamic State extremist group, offering no details but promising a foreign policy strategy that "means crushing ISIS rapidly." ISIS is an acronym used to refer to the Islamic State.

More: http://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2016/dec/17/trump-slams-u-s-interventions-vows-to-c/