I don't like personal attacks on family members, regardless of who it is.
It's a cheap shot that does NOTHING to advance the political debate.
Normally I would agree, but Chelsea Clinton is not just a politician's family member. She's putting herself out there, and there's huge push to make her appear as "Hillary 2.0", except you know, young, fresh and relevant, and... oh... so... saucy. And
make no mistake, she's setting up for a future run - one more heir apparent from a "royal family" that is, apparently, only of a handful of only blood lines capable of producing politicians to lead this great nation.
While I think that Duterte is nothing more than a foul-mouthed thug who everyone ought to mock and laugh at, and I find Pierce Morgan's existence offensive and think his rightful place is installed with his mouth as a toilet bowl in a busy street corner in Mumbai, I can't really fault them for calling out Chelsea Clinton here, if they did.