I don't care. The main fuss is that the Russians "influenced" the vote (by releasing Hilary's dirty laundry) not hacked it and changed the results. Isn't that the same as the media all coming down on Trump, trying to "influence" the voters? Who gives a shit. Let the dude have his four years and see where it takes us.
It's not quite the same. The media isn't another country with who we have dubious relations.
So where is the proof? I have yet to see anything. So saying this over and over again doesn't make it true, regardless of what Joseph Goebbels would have you believe
Proof of what? That country and media aren't comparable, as Irongrip400 suggested they were?
Maybe this will help you understand better, if it is even possible.
du-bi-ous [doo-bee-uh s]
adjective
1. doubtful; marked by or occasioning doubt:
a dubious reply.
2. of doubtful quality or propriety; questionable:
a dubious compliment; a dubious transaction.
3. of uncertain outcome:
in dubious battle.
4. wavering or hesitating in opinion; inclined to doubt.
me-di-a [mee-dee-uh]
noun
1. a plural of medium.
2. (usually used with a plural verb) the means of communication, as radio and television, newspapers, magazines, and the Internet, that reach or influence people widely:
The media are covering the speech tonight.
coun-try [kuhn-tree]
1. a state or nation:
What European countries have you visited?
2. the territory of a nation.
