dorian beats him in calves thats it
WELL....
muscle shape wise both had ok shape 'Ronnie had fuller bellies'in most body parts over yates,,cept calves
arms ,,Ronnie 'bis' yates tri's'condition/look
chest,,ronnie'later they were droopy looking,..yates chest from front wasn't as complete looking as ronnies
back,yates'concrete looking,slabbed 'esp from side'twisting shots,fr to rear lat spread'mastered...Ronnie had a freak back too esp traps to mid back but he looked awkward in fr spread'esp when heavier,
traps..Ronnie 'no contest'
legs ..ronnies in prime were sick,,,i will say yates longer legs into those calves looked great 'quad separation shape was inferior to coleman'
calves yates landslide
delts'ronnie'better shape/separation
structure ,,yates.. good torso length to legs'longish but narrow hips,made signature poses look awesome,coleman shorter torso compared to yates..
condition..both for there best showings had unbeatable builds,,but very different looks .
overall coleman had better shape and per the scale was heavier /bigger than yates..
I would still say watching the 96 grand prix video yates package he had that show could be the top mro level build seen.
this pic is pretty awesome over coleman ...