« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: man of the 70's vs man of the 60's vs man of the 50's  (Read 9656 times)

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8779
  • .......
Re: man of the 70's vs man of the 60's vs man of the 50's
« Reply #25 on: April 09, 2017, 06:38:41 AM »
Quote from: Irongrip400 on April 09, 2017, 06:30:46 AM
Holy shit. The bottom pic looks like it could be walking the street today!

Yes, that's why these discoveries were offensive to certain people.
Logged

Pray_4_War

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15801
  • Thot Expert
Re: man of the 70's vs man of the 60's vs man of the 50's
« Reply #26 on: April 09, 2017, 06:54:47 AM »
Quote from: Irongrip400 on April 09, 2017, 06:30:46 AM
Holy shit. The bottom pic looks like it could be walking the street today!

In Detroit.
Logged

DroppingPlates

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49987
  • Team Pocahontas
Re: man of the 70's vs man of the 60's vs man of the 50's
« Reply #27 on: April 09, 2017, 08:20:16 AM »
Logged

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: man of the 70's vs man of the 60's vs man of the 50's
« Reply #28 on: April 09, 2017, 07:44:45 PM »
Quote from: Irongrip400 on April 09, 2017, 06:30:46 AM
Holy shit. The bottom pic looks like it could be walking the street today!

Except for the forehead and eyebrows.
Logged

The Scott

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21448
  • I'm a victim of soicumcision!!
Re: man of the 70's vs man of the 60's vs man of the 50's
« Reply #29 on: April 09, 2017, 08:18:23 PM »
Quote from: Wiggs on April 08, 2017, 04:05:34 PM
No Kwon. These are not real. These are made up. Sorry to burst your bubble.

Wiggs tellin' be tellin' de troof just like Donna Brazile...Another fine "christian" woman.
Logged

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8779
  • .......
Re: man of the 70's vs man of the 60's vs man of the 50's
« Reply #30 on: April 11, 2017, 08:13:18 AM »
Quote from: Danimal77 on April 09, 2017, 07:44:45 PM
Except for the forehead and eyebrows.

If he was put in modern clothes and someone called him a primitive human or less evolved humanoid species, they would be called a racist.
Logged

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39853
  • Getbig!
Re: man of the 70's vs man of the 60's vs man of the 50's
« Reply #31 on: April 11, 2017, 09:44:27 AM »
 ;D
Logged
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39853
  • Getbig!
Re: man of the 70's vs man of the 60's vs man of the 50's
« Reply #32 on: April 11, 2017, 09:45:14 AM »
 ;D
Logged
F

The Abdominal Snoman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23503
  • DON'T BE A TRAITOR TO YOUR TRIBE
Re: man of the 70's vs man of the 60's vs man of the 50's
« Reply #33 on: April 11, 2017, 01:26:21 PM »
Quote from: Kwon on April 08, 2017, 04:03:22 PM
It's Homo Naledi, who bridged the gap between Australopithecus Afarensis (3,2 million years ago) and Homo Erectus (1.6 million years ago).

Relative to Homo Mirage, who lived near the ice.

Australopithecus Afarensis


Homo Erectus aka Hebrees



Homo-Mirage

Logged

Brianthehulk

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 142
  • Getbig!
Re: man of the 70's vs man of the 60's vs man of the 50's
« Reply #34 on: April 11, 2017, 09:56:58 PM »
Someone find a photo of the homeless guy with the radio voice, I swear that bottom pick is him!
Logged

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39853
  • Getbig!
Re: man of the 70's vs man of the 60's vs man of the 50's
« Reply #35 on: April 12, 2017, 05:46:40 AM »
Quote from: Brianthehulk on April 11, 2017, 09:56:58 PM
Someone find a photo of the homeless guy with the radio voice, I swear that bottom pick is him!
wasn't the guys name ted williams????
Logged
F
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »