would you have want to be born earlier even if it meant you would be older

[ratherbebig]

the good stuff: say you were born in 1945, then you would've been in your 20's in the mid 60's.

the bad stuff: you would be in your 70's today. that is if you would still be alive.

[ratherbebig]

fuck it ill answer my own question

yes i rather be born in 1945.

even if that meant i would be dead today.

modern life sucks!

[Kwon]

How about being born 1700 but stop aging around 22.

Which would mean you would be 22 today.

[ratherbebig]

can i change my name to ratherbeborn45

thanks  

or should it be ratherbedead

[ratherbebig]

How about being born 1700 but stop aging around 22.

Which would mean you would be 22 today.

i dont know thats an awful long time to hang around

say you wanna go to venice beach to work out with arnold, you had to wait 275 years

[ratherbebig]

some people were born in the 60's so by the 80s they died by the aids

[Kwon]

i dont know thats an awful long time to hang around

say you wanna go to venice beach to work out with arnold, you had to wait 275 years

Let's say you keep your brain as it is now, but suddenly wake up tomorrow and it's 1700.

With all your knowledge you prepare yourself (eating correctly, start training as soon as you are able etc) to get in your best shape possible with the means possible , and then you stop aging as soon as you reach 22.

You would constantly be ripped/in good shape as you gain more and more knowledge over the decades.

Body of a 22 year old and the mind of an older man, gaining wisdom for each century.

Im sure you would have the patience to wait for a young Arnold to emerge 275 years from then.

[ratherbebig]

i dont know man

im trying hard to picture what it would like to be around in the 70s, 1700's is a different ball game

70s, what a trip

for some.

for others it was a trip to 'nam. which is a good thing if you got to kill some gooks but if you got killed by gooks it wasnt as good thing.

see, there's a good side and a bad side to everything, im starting to learn this just now!

well not always. its 2017.
nothing good about that.

stupid year. stupid decade. FUCK MAN

[Royalty]

fuck it ill answer my own question

yes i rather be born in 1945.

even if that meant i would be dead today.

modern life sucks!

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=634232.0

[NelsonMuntz]

Most would have rather been born in the early 1900's so they would not be around to be bored to tears by your threads

[Kwon]

[The Wizard of Truth]

I think, and I've said this to my friends, this is the last generation in Europe at least that straight white Christian non-liberals will have a fair shot, unless there's a Europe wide extermination of 3rd world immigrants

[Irongrip400]

Most would have rather been born in the early 1900's so they would not be around to be bored to tears by your threads

Would like this too, but only because I wouldn't see the end of Western civilization. I'd also hang out in Vienna around 1908 and find a down on his luck painter and give him some tips on the future ala Biff Tannen in Back To The Future 2.

[Eric2]

Mid 1800s America would be great. Carve out a piece of land in the wilderness, have a mail order bride. No sassy bitch to nag on you. All the free range hunting and brown people where legal to shoot! No permits for anything! Course the smallpox, measles, herpes and other shit would suck.

[Primemuscle]

the good stuff: say you were born in 1945, then you would've been in your 20's in the mid 60's.

the bad stuff: you would be in your 70's today. that is if you would still be alive.

-Born in '44 - had fun and got married in the 60's - raised a family in the 70's and 80's - middle age meltdown in the 90's - prepped for retirement with the start of a new decade - retired in 2009 - enjoying a comfortable life now - looking forward to a long future....but you never know what fate will bring. I'm not going to worry about it.

[Primemuscle]

How about being born 1700 but stop aging around 22.

Which would mean you would be 22 today.

- And a vampire.

[NelsonMuntz]

-Born in '44 - had fun and got married in the 60's - raised a family in the 70's and 80's - middle age meltdown in the 90's - prepped for retirement with the start of a new decade - retired in 2009 - enjoying a comfortable life now - looking forward to a long future....but you never know what fate will bring. I'm not going to worry about it.

was this where the taste of penis touched your tastebuds fo the first time

[The Wizard of Truth]

I'd probably be more suited to living as a Viking. Modern rules and faggotory were never for me. I do however enjoy hot showers and taking snapchats of handicapped people...

[Primemuscle]

was this where the taste of penis touched your tastebuds fo the first time

Long, long time before this.

[The Wizard of Truth]

-Born in '44 - had fun and got married in the 60's - raised a family in the 70's and 80's - middle age meltdown in the 90's - prepped for retirement with the start of a new decade - retired in 2009 - enjoying a comfortable life now - looking forward to a long future....but you never know what fate will bring. I'm not going to worry about it.

Fair play to you, you seem to have had a rewarding and fulfilling life. Pity you're a fag

[Primemuscle]

I'd probably be more suited to living as a Viking. Modern rules and faggotory were never for me. I do however enjoy hot showers and taking snapchats of handicapped people...

Maybe not modern age faggotry, but homosexuality for sure:

"The evidence of the sagas and laws shows that male homosexuality was regarded in two lights: there was nothing at all strange or shameful about a man having intercourse with another man if he was in the active or "manly" role, however the passive partner in homosexual intercourse was regarded with derision. It must be remembered, however, that the laws and sagas reflect the Christian consciousness of the Icelander or Norwegian of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, well after the pagan period. The myths and legends show that honored gods and heroes were believed to have taken part in homosexual acts, which may indicate that pre-Christian Viking Scandinavia was more tolerant of homosexuality, and history is altogether silent as to the practice of lesbianism in the Viking Age."

http://www.vikinganswerlady.com/gayvik.shtml

[The Wizard of Truth]

Maybe not modern age faggotry, but homosexuality for sure:

"The evidence of the sagas and laws shows that male homosexuality was regarded in two lights: there was nothing at all strange or shameful about a man having intercourse with another man if he was in the active or "manly" role, however the passive partner in homosexual intercourse was regarded with derision. It must be remembered, however, that the laws and sagas reflect the Christian consciousness of the Icelander or Norwegian of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, well after the pagan period. The myths and legends show that honored gods and heroes were believed to have taken part in homosexual acts, which may indicate that pre-Christian Viking Scandinavia was more tolerant of homosexuality, and history is altogether silent as to the practice of lesbianism in the Viking Age."

http://www.vikinganswerlady.com/gayvik.shtml

I didn't mean literally acts of homosexuality, I meant tolerance of refugees, queers, junkies, wasters, and the fact every single child now is adhd or autistic. Smother them all in infant hood, keep the downs children, they're funny

[Eric2]

Figures................. .not even into the second page of this thread and the fagotry has once again come out from the closet.

[The Wizard of Truth]

Figures..................not even into the second page of this thread and the fagotry has once again come out from the closet.

Ban guys

[Eric2]

Time to un gay