Alfurinn you seem fairly literate, compared to others, but that doesn't mean much because so many educated people are the absolute worst at promoting post modern neo-marxism without thinking a few steps forward and seeing where it leads.
First off, I'm talking about the homosexual agenda, you're trying to conflate the issue and bring it right back to homosexuality. Yes I don't like homosexuality. No I don't think gays should be killed. They shouldn't be celebrated, either, and they shouldn't be making a big show of their sexuality. And yes, everything past the "LG" in lgbtqia is now lumped together, and that was the homosexuals' mistake.
Carnival in Rio does not make it even. Are you kidding me? Gay pride happens in every fucking city, all the disgusting things I posted is being pushed and promoted by the media, and here you are justifying it.
Why?
Can you say that homosexuality is fine but the gay agenda has gone too far?
As for a flaw: it's a biological flaw, as I already stated. Proof is in the pudding. Survival of the fittest, evolution, propagation of your genetic make up. All that is wiped away in homosexuals due to their innate desires. I'm not saying they're incapable of impregnating women... all I'm saying is they lack the drive, and, from an evolutionary standpoint, that is an absolutely abhorrent flaw.
Again, you seem so ideologically brainwahsed that, at least, the way you present yourself in this forum seems heavily influenced by your political views and like you cannot scape the left vs right way of thinking. It's like the fundamentalist christian who believes spirits speak into your soul to do good or bad. Unable of unbiased thought.
There is no homosexual agenda or gay agenda. The only thing going on is that when people are systematically mistreated when there is no justification for such action it is natural that people will raise their voices. As society gains more knowlegde and can dismiss prejudices the logical procedure is making society more just and equal. The pavement you walk on is also paid with the taxes gay people pay with their work. More than once a gay doctor has treated you so that your health can recover, etc. Well, obviously what you "gay agenda" is your opposition to egalitarianism.
If you don't like homosexuality, I don't think that's of any relevance anywhere and I don't see why homosexuality has to be a matter of others liking it or not. The thing is that you dont have the right to limit the rights of others to express themselves especially when no one is being harmed.
Although others have been more explicit in defining why you care so much about it to the point this thread has almost competely changed its purpose, I dare say that apart from possibly upbringing, your personal idea of homosexuality triggers things about you that you fear about yourself.
Have you ever seen Rio? It's literally a heterosexual orgy. And Rio is not the only one of those massive festival where heterosexual lust is vastly celebrated. And sure there are more festivals of similar characteristics in the world, traditional and commercial ones. Why pointing your fingers at one but not the other? Why do you use one to define a whole groupof people but ignore its counterparts to define the others?
Lacking the ability to fall in love with the opposite sex is not a flaw; it's simply a variant of human and animal sexuality (well, humans part of the animal kingdom). Obviously your use of "flaw" is ideological; not scientific.
Heterosexuality doesn't make people holier and homosexuality dens't make anybody evil. Sexual orientation has no influence on how good or bad a person can be. Unfortunatley, you promote the opposite of this.
Remember, LGB people are born from heterosexual couples and many of them don't hold your prejudices.
This was supposed to be a funny thread, but it seems even OP has abandoned his own thread.
