Author Topic: Yates' gut this Yates gut that... (Read 38334 times)

Oliver Klaushof · « **Reply #50 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:37:49 PM »

Quote from: nicorulez on April 07, 2006, 09:36:31 PM

Oliver, the abs are genetic, that is not Ronnie's fault. Jay has better abs than Dorian and a set of wheels. Thus, he crushes Yates also.

So are you saying genetic differences don't factor in bodybuilding contest?

"Let midgets compete against Coleman - it's genetic."

Oliver Klaushof · « **Reply #51 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:39:14 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 07, 2006, 09:37:21 PM

because Ronnie has these huge muscle groups called QUADS that destroy Dorians.

And Dorian has calves...............

Two less abs is as much a detriment to the pose as a missing bicep is to the rear double

nicorulez · « **Reply #52 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:40:07 PM »

So Oliver, the fact that Ronnie has genetically superior arms, thighs, chest thickness, hams, glutes and shoulders mean nothing.....did not think so. If all you are talking about are abs, check out Yates condition in some of the Mr. Olympia's. Not pretty. Best shape ever was 1991 and 1993. He was big in 1995, but his arms were totally screwed.

nicorulez · « **Reply #53 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:41:14 PM »

I agree, Dorian had the best calves of all time.....no....I am wrong....Matarazzo had the best calves of all time....

Hulkster · « **Reply #54 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:41:31 PM »

Yates has a better midsection when Flexed than Ronnie does. That is obvious.

But it is also obvious that Yates quads are so pathetic that he is AFRAID to flex them properly!!

Oliver Klaushof · « **Reply #55 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:41:37 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 07, 2006, 09:36:06 PM

umm..can you not see his shitty quads in the lat spread?

Yates Lat spread was ONLY good from the Waist UP.

this is a COMPLETE lat spread:

Ronnie has something that dorian has never heard of:

Thigh Sweep

and

Thigh cuts.

LuciusFox · « **Reply #56 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:43:02 PM »

Quote from: Oliver Klaushof on April 07, 2006, 09:41:37 PM

Look how pathetic Dorian's arms are in that picture. I'm embarrassed for him.

Oliver Klaushof · « **Reply #57 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:44:15 PM »

Quote from: nicorulez on April 07, 2006, 09:40:07 PM

So Oliver, the fact that Ronnie has genetically superior arms, thighs, chest thickness, hams, glutes and shoulders mean nothing.....did not think so. If all you are talking about are abs, check out Yates condition in some of the Mr. Olympia's. Not pretty. Best shape ever was 1991 and 1993. He was big in 1995, but his arms were totally screwed.

Actually, at his best, Dorian has a bigger chest and larger shoulders. You are wrong.

Ronnie has a flat chest. His whole torso is flat because his stomach sticks out farther than his chest in every pose.

LuciusFox · « **Reply #58 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:45:18 PM »

Quote from: Oliver Klaushof on April 07, 2006, 09:44:15 PM

Actually, at his best, Dorian has a bigger chest and larger shoulders. You are wrong.

Ronnie has a flat chest. His whole torso is flat because his stomach sticks out farther than his chest in every pose.

Hahahhaha...Ronnie's chest and shoulders are more separated and larger.

MisterMagoo · « **Reply #59 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:46:48 PM »

i love how this thread started by talking about how great dorian was over 260 and starts off with a picture of him earlier when he was considerably lighter.

ronnies abs look like a pot of uncooked ravioli and dorians legs look like they got run over by a tractor. at the end of the day, a bulgy stomach is better than a shitty entire lower body.

LuciusFox · « **Reply #60 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:47:56 PM »

Quote from: MisterMagoo on April 07, 2006, 09:46:48 PM

i love how this thread started by talking about how great dorian was over 260 and starts off with a picture of him earlier when he was considerably lighter.

ronnies abs look like a pot of uncooked ravioli and dorians legs look like they got run over by a tractor. at the end of the day, a bulgy stomach is better than a shitty entire lower body.

Great post

Hulkster · « **Reply #61 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:49:08 PM »

Dorian's calves overpower his quads and arms. How pathetic.

Oliver Klaushof · « **Reply #62 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:49:48 PM »

Quote from: MisterMagoo on April 07, 2006, 09:46:48 PM

i love how this thread started by talking about how great dorian was over 260 and starts off with a picture of him earlier when he was considerably lighter.

ronnies abs look like a pot of uncooked ravioli and dorians legs look like they got run over by a tractor. at the end of the day, a bulgy stomach is better than a shitty entire lower body.

You prolly say that because you're a black guy.

Hulkster · « **Reply #63 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:51:35 PM »

Dingleberry · « **Reply #64 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:53:37 PM »

I won't even get into the argument about who's better, but I will say although Ronnie comes in bigger every year, he's beginning to look deformed. Not knocking the guy, he's a beast, I just think he's starting to look a little misshapen.

Hulkster · « **Reply #65 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:54:56 PM »

calves that overpower the entire body:

amazing arms! not.

LuciusFox · « **Reply #66 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:58:10 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 07, 2006, 09:54:56 PM

calves that overpower the entire body:

amazing arms! not.

What an ugly physique. Jesus Christ, he looks like shit warmed over.

controldenied33 · « **Reply #67 on:** April 07, 2006, 10:02:42 PM »

Quote from: LuciusFox on April 07, 2006, 09:14:15 PM

Nassar had a better ab/thigh, sorry. Ronnie in 1999 and 2003 had a better ab/thigh. Nice try

Ronnie in 2003???are you smoking crack?

Hulkster · « **Reply #68 on:** April 07, 2006, 10:03:15 PM »

whats really amazing is that people that don't pay attention actually think that Dorian had a proportioned physique.

when upon closer inspection, we soon see that he had calves that were too big for his quads AND arms. Doesn't speak to highly of his arms and quads now does it?

LuciusFox · « **Reply #69 on:** April 07, 2006, 10:03:44 PM »

Quote from: controldenied33 on April 07, 2006, 10:02:42 PM

Ronnie in 2003???are you smoking crack?

No, you are.

controldenied33 · « **Reply #70 on:** April 07, 2006, 10:08:32 PM »

Quote from: LuciusFox on April 07, 2006, 10:03:44 PM

No, you are.

Ronnie's midsection in 2003 was arguably at its worse in his career. I'm not going to say Ronnie at his best wasn't better than Dorian at his best, because Ronnie is, but it's almost like you pulled the years 1999 and 2003 out of your ass.