Boner or not boner. There is no parsh.
A brief but profound display of erudition, Tape! No doubt you are calling upon your Heidegger.
For those very few outside of the loop, take note. Tape suggests that something either is or is not, so, because the referred to in-between state, i.e., the so-called "parsh," is neither of the disjuncts, it frustrates any kind of ontological commitments. Heidegger embarrassingly argued in favor of
das Parsh with his philosophy of
Dasein (simultaneous here-being and there-being) by famously stating that the only authentic kind of Being is the "not-yet." However, as devastatingly shot down by Heidegger's lusty housemaid, "you might call
das Parsh something, but soft entry sucks."
