White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey

[Primemuscle]

Your gut feeling based on what you have read and heard is pretty limited, because you insulate yourself, so I don't think it's very reliable. 

We never know how any criminal case is going to turn out.  Anytime you put a decision in the hands of 12 strangers, anything can happen.  OJ walked.  Trump was convicted (of something).  Neither was the correct result.  But usually, what is supposed to happen does happen.  I really hope they get it right with Comey and convict him.

Despite your opinion, Comey remains innocent until proven guilty. It seems if his fate was up to you, he would already have been convicted. I do not think your gut feeling on this is very reliable.

[Moontrane]

All the late-night shows' ratings have been falling since 2015. In 2024-2025 Stephen Colbert had the highest total viewership with Jimmy Kimmel coming in second and Jimmy Fallon coming in third. So yes, a huge bunch of people did tune in to see Jimmy Kimmel's show, somewhere around 6.3 million viewers which was up from an average of 1.4 million viewers. No doubt his return show pulled in many people who will not become regular viewers. But no doubt some will. My point was and continues to be that thanks to his being taken off the air, his return show grew by 340%. FCC Chair Brendan Carr said in reference to suspending the Jimmy Kimmel show, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.”  Then Disney, ABC and affiliates suspended the Jimmy Kimmel show for less than a week before they saw the light and put the show back on. The public spoke and the public and Jimmy Kimmel won this battle. This is Karma.

You are right, I have no way of knowing if the charges against James Comey will be dismissed just as you have no way of knowing that they won't. This is because neither you nor I are legal experts, many of whom believe it will be dismissed for various reasons, including that the charges lack crucial details such as specific quotes from Comey's testimony that are alleged to be criminal lies. Also, the DOJ previously declined to prosecute the case against him because they found no evidence of Comey's willful intent to violate the law. But, regardless of whether there is a dismissal, acquittal, or conviction, there is likely to be appeals, prolonging the legal process. Therefore, it could be quite long time before either you or I or the rest of the world will know how this mess turns out.

Again, you are right that I do not know if the case will be dismissed but my gut feeling based on what I have read and heard is that it will be. And I also think whether it is or is not dismissed, many people will disagree with the outcome.

Except for Gutfeld.  His audience is growing - over 3 million right now.

[Dos Equis]

Despite your opinion, Comey remains innocent until proven guilty. It seems if his fate was up to you, he would already have been convicted. I do not think your gut feeling on this is very reliable.

If his fate was up to me, I would have him get indicted, tried by a jury of his peers, convicted, and sentenced to prison.  That innocent until proven guilty concept applies in court.  We're not in court.  We are all free to express an opinion on guilt or innocence, regardless of what the outcome of any criminal case might be.  People tend to throw that line out there when the person they have some kind of allegiance with is being prosecuted. 

And like I previously mentioned, the outcome of a criminal case doesn't mean the person didn't actually do what they were convicted of doing (or acquitted).  Sometimes people are wrongfully convicted, like the Trump case.  Sometimes people are improperly acquitted, like OJ.  Sometimes people who have clearly broken the law are never charged, like Hillary Clinton.     

[Skeletor]

If his fate was up to me, I would have him get indicted, tried by a jury of his peers, convicted, and sentenced to prison.  That innocent until proven guilty concept applies in court.  We're not in court.  We are all free to express an opinion on guilt or innocence, regardless of what the outcome of any criminal case might be.  People tend to throw that line out there when the person they have some kind of allegiance with is being prosecuted. 

And like I previously mentioned, the outcome of a criminal case doesn't mean the person didn't actually do what they were convicted of doing (or acquitted).  Sometimes people are wrongfully convicted, like the Trump case.  Sometimes people are improperly acquitted, like OJ.  Sometimes people who have clearly broken the law are never charged, like Hillary Clinton.     

Remember when leftists and their media were constantly stating that Trump is innocent until proven guilty and didn't even utter a word before any court decision?

Yeah, me neither.

[Primemuscle]

If his fate was up to me, I would have him get indicted, tried by a jury of his peers, convicted, and sentenced to prison.  That innocent until proven guilty concept applies in court.  We're not in court.  We are all free to express an opinion on guilt or innocence, regardless of what the outcome of any criminal case might be.  People tend to throw that line out there when the person they have some kind of allegiance with is being prosecuted. 

And like I previously mentioned, the outcome of a criminal case doesn't mean the person didn't actually do what they were convicted of doing (or acquitted).  Sometimes people are wrongfully convicted, like the Trump case.  Sometimes people are improperly acquitted, like OJ.  Sometimes people who have clearly broken the law are never charged, like Hillary Clinton.     

FYI, I have no allegiance to James Comey. In fact, I dislike that he chose On October 28, 2016, eleven days before the election to announce a FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails, thus violating the long-standing Department of Justice policy against taking actions that could affect the outcome of an election, which this very likely did.

[Grape Ape]

There needs to be accountability for those who legit attempted to oust a duly elected president, so this deters it from ever happening again.

Russigate was an attempted coup, swept under the rug by a dishonest media, and TDS affected citizens.

[Dos Equis]

Remember when leftists and their media were constantly stating that Trump is innocent until proven guilty and didn't even utter a word before any court decision?

Yeah, me neither.

Because they are hypocrites.

[Dos Equis]

There needs to be accountability for those who legit attempted to oust a duly elected president, so this deters it from ever happening again.

Russigate was an attempted coup, swept under the rug by a dishonest media, and TDS affected citizens.

I agree.

[Dos Equis]

James Comey Just Made a Predictable Move to Avoid Prosecution – It Won't Work
Jeff Charles  | October 21, 2025
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/jeff-charles/2025/10/21/james-comey-tries-to-dismiss-criminal-case-n2665251

[Dos Equis]

Bondi to Appeal Dismissal of Comey, James Cases
By Newsmax Wires    |  25 November 2025
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/bondi-appeal-dismissal/2025/11/25/id/1235938/

[Primemuscle]

Bondi to Appeal Dismissal of Comey, James Cases
By Newsmax Wires    |  25 November 2025
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/bondi-appeal-dismissal/2025/11/25/id/1235938/

Odds are that the dismissal will be upheld.

[illuminati]

Odds are that the dismissal will be upheld.

Let's hope not

[Primemuscle]

Let's hope not

My hope is that justice will prevail.

[Dos Equis]

Odds are that the dismissal will be upheld.

Says who? And why?

[Dos Equis]

My hope is that justice will prevail.

If you want justice to prevail then you are hoping for a conviction. 

[chaos]

If you want justice to prevail then you are hoping for a conviction.

He can't say that or Lurker will disown him.

[B_B_C]

https://www.amazon.com/8646-Impeach-Biden-Anti-Joe/dp/B09F1GKKFV?customId=B07536XX75&customizationToken=MC_Assembly_1%23B07536XX75&th=1&psc=1

 Brand: 8646 Impeach Biden Anti Joe Biden Shirts






8646 Impeach Biden 86 46 Anti Biden Joe Biden 46th President Premium T-Shirt

[Primemuscle]

https://www.amazon.com/8646-Impeach-Biden-Anti-Joe/dp/B09F1GKKFV?customId=B07536XX75&customizationToken=MC_Assembly_1%23B07536XX75&th=1&psc=1

 Brand: 8646 Impeach Biden Anti Joe Biden Shirts


Whoever is #66 beware!





8646 Impeach Biden 86 46 Anti Biden Joe Biden 46th President Premium T-Shirt

[LurkerNoMore]

He can't say that or Lurker will disown him.

How did that work out for you?  The second time is going to be more pathetically hilarious.

[LurkerNoMore]

There needs to be accountability for those who legit attempted to oust a duly elected president, so this deters it from ever happening again.

Russigate was an attempted coup, swept under the rug by a dishonest media, and TDS affected citizens.

I have asked this numerous times and yet - seems to be only crickets that answer.

How about accountability for those who legitimately attempted to oust a duly elected president?  You know, the real ones.

The ones who filed bogus and bullshit lawsuits.
The ones who demanded recounts over and over despite their own party verifying the prior results and denying any fraud?
The ones who joined a little group together as fake electors and submitted fake votes of certification that were 100% fraudulent?
The ones that lied over and over again about the outcome resulting in fines, bankruptcy, loss of professional licenses, and mockery?
The ones that tried to storm a Congressional session that was in the process of certifying the votes?
The ones who believed that loser when he was begging his VP to call it for him and refuse to certify the results of the election?
The ones who tried to rescind their certification for their state's outcome?
The ones who attempted to seize voting machines?

Are these actions considered trying to oust a duly elected president?  You never seem to mention them or even answer when the question is brought up.  Here come the crickets again.

[chaos]

I have asked this numerous times and yet - seems to be only crickets that answer.

How about accountability for those who legitimately attempted to oust a duly elected president?  You know, the real ones.

The ones who filed bogus and bullshit lawsuits.
The ones who demanded recounts over and over despite their own party verifying the prior results and denying any fraud?
The ones who joined a little group together as fake electors and submitted fake votes of certification that were 100% fraudulent?
The ones that lied over and over again about the outcome resulting in fines, bankruptcy, loss of professional licenses, and mockery?
The ones that tried to storm a Congressional session that was in the process of certifying the votes?
The ones who believed that loser when he was begging his VP to call it for him and refuse to certify the results of the election?
The ones who tried to rescind their certification for their state's outcome?
The ones who attempted to seize voting machines?

Are these actions considered trying to oust a duly elected president?  You never seem to mention them or even answer when the question is brought up.  Here come the crickets again.

Tit for tat, faggot.

[Grape Ape]

Tit for tat, faggot.

He believes legally filing lawsuits is the equivalent of using phony documents to obtain FISA warrants.

[LurkerNoMore]

He believes legally filing lawsuits is the equivalent of using phony documents to obtain FISA warrants.

You believe gathering a group of fake electors to submit fake votes is better or worse?  How about the ones that tried to rescind their votes for their state's certification after being pressured?

You have no comparison to measure by what the MAGAtards attempted.

[LurkerNoMore]

Tit for tat, faggot.

And how did that work out for you besides turning you into a whining crying queer projecting cunt?

I bet you already ordered your 6947 tshirt.

[chaos]

And how did that work out for you besides turning you into a whining crying queer projecting cunt?

I bet you already ordered your 6947 tshirt.

Relax LurkingforBOYS, your TDS induced high blood pressure is going to kill you.