Author Topic: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey  (Read 3461 times)

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59594
  • It’s All Bullshit
White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/12/white-house-doj-should-certainly-look-at-prosecuting-james-comey.html

Getting closer

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40739
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2017, 06:11:43 PM »
Sarah Huckabee Sanders makes me want to puke.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2017, 06:38:38 PM »
White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/12/white-house-doj-should-certainly-look-at-prosecuting-james-comey.html

Getting closer

LOL - you probably actually believe this

Do you think Comey will be prosecuted before or after Congress files charged against Lois Lerner or Susan Rice

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59594
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #3 on: September 12, 2017, 06:40:54 PM »
Sarah Huckabee Sanders makes me want to puke.

I'm sure she'll be distraught when she finds out

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #4 on: September 12, 2017, 06:52:43 PM »
Sarah Huckabee Sanders makes me want to puke.

She's a real chip (or chunk) off the old Blob


Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59594
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #5 on: September 12, 2017, 07:37:49 PM »
LOL - you probably actually believe this

Do you think Comey will be prosecuted before or after Congress files charged against Lois Lerner or Susan Rice


Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #6 on: September 12, 2017, 07:58:57 PM »
.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #7 on: September 12, 2017, 08:55:05 PM »
Sarah Huckabee Sanders makes me want to puke.

Why?

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #8 on: September 12, 2017, 09:19:53 PM »
Why?

I'm guessing he's disgusted by the blatant lying
or just that she's fat and disgusting
or the potent and vomit inducing combination of the two


Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25735
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #9 on: September 13, 2017, 09:07:34 AM »
I'm guessing he's disgusted by the blatant lying
or just that she's fat and disgusting
or the potent and vomit inducing combination of the two




Fuck off you commie bastard
A

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #10 on: September 13, 2017, 09:29:31 AM »

Fuck off you commie bastard

LOL

you're really on the rag over the car

Any more BREAKING NEWS on your quest to buy a shitty used car

I've been checking CNN all week but they haven't covered the story of a broke ass loser getting suckered into buying a salvaged pile of shit


Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59594
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #11 on: September 13, 2017, 10:17:32 AM »
I'm guessing he's disgusted by the blatant lying
or just that she's fat and disgusting
or the potent and vomit inducing combination of the two



What did she lie about?

Nick Danger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8640
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #12 on: September 13, 2017, 01:38:46 PM »
What did she lie about?

She said she had spoken to many FBI members who lost confidence in Comey's leadership.
https://vault.fbi.gov

/FBI%20Field%20Office%20and%20Headquarters%20Climate%20Survey%20Results

http://time.com/4775840/james-comey-fbi-fired-trump-mccabe-confidence/

She also said Trump didn't lie about the phone calls from the Boy Scout leader or the Mexican President.

Boy Scouts say they are unaware of the call, and the leaked transcript with the Mexican President show that he blatantly lied.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #13 on: September 13, 2017, 01:43:22 PM »
She said she had spoken to many FBI members who lost confidence in Comey's leadership.
https://vault.fbi.gov

/FBI%20Field%20Office%20and%20Headquarters%20Climate%20Survey%20Results

http://time.com/4775840/james-comey-fbi-fired-trump-mccabe-confidence/

She also said Trump didn't lie about the phone calls from the Boy Scout leader or the Mexican President.

Boy Scouts say they are unaware of the call, and the leaked transcript with the Mexican President show that he blatantly lied.

Your first link doesn't dispute anything she said.  It doesn't show that 100 percent of FBI employees had not lost confidence in Comey. 

Didn't click the second link. 

Fuzzy Nuts

  • Guest
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #14 on: September 13, 2017, 02:09:21 PM »
Nice to see they have moved on from Obamas birth certificate. ::)

Nick Danger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8640
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #15 on: September 13, 2017, 03:51:39 PM »
Your first link doesn't dispute anything she said.  It doesn't show that 100 percent of FBI employees had not lost confidence in Comey.  

Didn't click the second link.  

She said she was in touch with "countless" FBI officials, meanwhile the Trump campaign was under FBI investigation.

Comey rated very highly in the FBI records. The "countless" agents should have reflected the survey numbers.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #16 on: September 13, 2017, 03:59:37 PM »
She said she was in touch with "countless" FBI officials, meanwhile the Trump campaign was under FBI investigation.

Comey rated very highly in the FBI records. The "countless" agents should have reflected the survey numbers.

Your post said "many."  "Countless" is obviously an exaggeration and most reasonably intelligent people who hear that in this context understand it. 

You don't know a whole lot about surveys.  lol  There are "countless" instances of people who are either lousy at what they do or even incompetent who receive good reviews from surveys.  The way you find out the truth is by doing exactly what she said:  talk to people individually, off the record. 

Nick Danger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8640
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #17 on: September 13, 2017, 04:06:50 PM »
Your post said "many."  "Countless" is obviously an exaggeration and most reasonably intelligent people who hear that in this context understand it. 

You don't know a whole lot about surveys.  lol  There are "countless" instances of people who are either lousy at what they do or even incompetent who receive good reviews from surveys.  The way you find out the truth is by doing exactly what she said:  talk to people individually, off the record. 

Do you think she was talking to "countless" FBI officials while White House was under FBI investigation?
The fact that she even mentioned it shows that her lie wasn't well thought out.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #18 on: September 13, 2017, 04:56:58 PM »
Do you think she was talking to "countless" FBI officials while White House was under FBI investigation?
The fact that she even mentioned it shows that her lie wasn't well thought out.

I just said "countless" is an obvious exaggeration. 

But let me use your logic:  You first claimed she said "many," then said she talked to "countless."  Were you lying when you said "many" or lying when you said "countless"? 

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #19 on: September 13, 2017, 05:32:41 PM »
What did she lie about?

When she said at Wednesday’s press briefing that Trump didn’t lie about calls from the Mexican president and leaders of Boy Scouts of America.

When she said “the president is not a liar

When she said that the White House heard from “countless members” of the FBI about their respective lack of confidence in James Comey

When she said “multiple news outlets” reported that former President Barack Obama ordered wiretaps on Trump.

Forgot to mention,  she also said he never promoted or encourage violence. 

I'm sure there are many more I've forgotten and there will be many more in the future

I'll bet the job is making her do even more stress eating than usual

Nick Danger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8640
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #20 on: September 13, 2017, 05:54:45 PM »
I just said "countless" is an obvious exaggeration. 

But let me use your logic:  You first claimed she said "many," then said she talked to "countless."  Were you lying when you said "many" or lying when you said "countless"? 

I said many, she said countless. So yes, I was lying.

 ::)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #21 on: September 13, 2017, 06:01:49 PM »
I said many, she said countless. So yes, I was lying.

 ::)

Glad we cleared that up.

Nick Danger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8640
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #22 on: September 14, 2017, 03:51:16 PM »
Trey Gowdy slams Sarah Sanders: 'Press secretaries don't get to make that call' of whether Comey broke the law

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trey-gowdy-slams-sarah-sanders-press-secretaries-dont-get-to-make-that-call-of-whether-comey-broke-the-law/article/2634451

About time someone called her out on the topic.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #23 on: September 14, 2017, 04:45:02 PM »
Trey Gowdy slams Sarah Sanders: 'Press secretaries don't get to make that call' of whether Comey broke the law

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trey-gowdy-slams-sarah-sanders-press-secretaries-dont-get-to-make-that-call-of-whether-comey-broke-the-law/article/2634451

About time someone called her out on the topic.

yep, saw that same opinion on "liberal" media last night

We know she was just reading what Trump (or one of his minions) told her to say but not only does the Press Secretary not make the call but neither does the White House. 

Totally inappropriate

Good for Gowdy to make this public statement


Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15631
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: White House: DOJ 'should certainly look at' prosecuting James Comey
« Reply #24 on: September 26, 2017, 05:36:39 PM »
House Republicans renew call for 2nd special counsel, amid fresh Comey concerns

House Republicans on Tuesday formally renewed their call for a second special counsel to probe 2016 controversies involving Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration – following allegations that former FBI director James Comey drafted an “exoneration statement” for Clinton weeks before interviewing her.

Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee, who first called for a second special counsel's appointment in July, cited several factors in a letter Tuesday to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and his deputy, Rod Rosenstein.

“In this case, it appears that Director Comey and other senior Justice Department and government officials may have pre-judged the ‘matter’ before all the facts were known, thereby ensuring former Secretary Clinton would not be charged for her criminal activity,” they wrote.

Foremost was the allegation – which emerged in transcripts of FBI staffer interviews conducted by the Office of Special Counsel – that the former FBI boss drafted a statement clearing Clinton in her personal email case weeks before interviewing her and making his public recommendation against criminal charges.

The claim has prompted some lawmakers to call for Comey to return to Capitol Hill to resolve discrepancies in his past statements.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/26/house-republicans-renew-call-for-2nd-special-counsel-amid-fresh-comey-concerns.html