Ok. They ban guns in UK at 1997, and mass murders increase, so there has been about equal amount mass murders between 1900- 1997 than 1997 -2017.
I'm not interested in debating gun control (I don't see how it works in the US), but let's be clear. If you think you actually have a point with that pissant, fuckhead wool-over-eyes attempt at statistical manipulation, kill yourself now, so there is one less moron in your country.
I don't think you're a moron. I think you're a statistics weasel. A member of the group of gun lovers who can't just tell the truth and seek to lie to further their cause.
Start telling the truth
Homocide Rates
US per 100k 4.88
UK per 100k 0.92
26 Gun murders (equiv. 130) in England vs. *11,004* in US Annually
You're safer in the UK without guns, period. Stop talking shit and start admitting that guns, when available, increase the homocide rate. It's okay. We all know they do. You don't have to post dickhead stats like the one you did to try to lie about that. Guns are fun, too, right? Guns make people feel like they have chance. It's not wrong to want to keep guns in your country. Just quit the bullshitting and keep to the truth. How do you get rid of 300 million guns in as long as time as it takes for a new regime to move in and repeal it? How do you stand tough when some people still die from guns and the media turns to spreading Fear Uncertainty and Doubt to sell their papers, popularising the idea that the populace is not safe - having given in their guns, whilst the criminals maintain theirs?
Repulsive use of weak ass statistics not needed.