What's up with all the criticism of Kev? I believe his actual birth year is 1965, so he came back at 51 with an upper body that was on par with almost anyone's on the stage - I am not including his back here. But his shoulders, traps, arms, abs, and chest - they were good enough for even the Mr. Olympia stage. At 51, that is amazing. It was everything else that lagged, but I don't hear him get any credit for those strengths. I think he looked great. And I do believe that he can improve his back and legs just enough to have a pro-worthy physique. Mr. Olympia-worthy? No. But pro-worthy, yes.