Author Topic: Why are Ronnie's calves so small? (Read 13920 times)

LuciusFox · « **Reply #50 on:** April 12, 2006, 04:34:23 PM »

Quote from: Ryan on April 12, 2006, 04:30:56 PM

In all honesty I see where you're getting at. But, to say europeans are not white is ludacris.( Majority are) And in Europe( as in Britain) they are considered "white europeans," not necessary caucasian because like you said indians and even south east asians are considered caucasians. But in the US caucasian is a term that is used to describe white americans. Anyways, if the Africans don't consider the blacks in america the same as they are, they are STILL black nonetheless. Just not black africans from africa but black americans.

What I saying is that Africans are not black anymore than Europeans are white. But I do see what you are saying. We are just pointlessly arguing about language anyway.

I guess I am just talking about what most Americans mean by "white".

Old-Skool · « **Reply #51 on:** April 12, 2006, 05:27:42 PM »

God made them that way so at least blonde white boys from Vegas have at least a grain of hope if Ronnie shows up out of shape....

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #52 on:** April 12, 2006, 10:46:17 PM »

Quote from: donrhummy on April 10, 2006, 09:23:28 PM

Lightweight baby, lightweight.

http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/201/img08929qo.jpg

Like most black men, he has shitty lower-body genetics. Of course, he has the great shoulder-to-waist ratio that blacks have. Too bad he ruined it, by taking enough IGF-1 to make himself look pregant with an alien queen.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

dontknowit · « **Reply #53 on:** April 13, 2006, 01:58:06 AM »

Quote from: Ryan on April 12, 2006, 02:28:07 AM

Lee Priest, Dorian, Nasser, Mike Matarrazzo, Mike Francios, Jay Cutler, Art Atwood, Markus Ruhl, Gunther, etc....... Even amatuer bodybuilder from Britain James Lewis.

Lee Priest ? Get your facts straight

Why Ronnie calves look small; monsterthighs, got nothing to do with actual size.

KevinP85 · « **Reply #54 on:** April 13, 2006, 03:13:45 AM »

Get my facts straight?

? You are an idiot if you do not think Lee Priest has good calves

dontknowit · « **Reply #55 on:** April 13, 2006, 05:43:37 AM »

The man is like 5'5, ofcourse they look good,
that doesn't mean that they're big.

It's just like a black man when he's smiling,
his teeth always look whiter.

natural al · « **Reply #56 on:** April 13, 2006, 07:05:25 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 11, 2006, 02:06:05 PM

I think the fact that Ronnie has not "enhanced" his calves speaks VOLUMES about his character.

If he had implants/injected them, they would certainly look a whole lot bigger than they do.

What you see is what you get with Big Ron.

No funny Flex Wheeler like crap with him. Only roids and pizza

c'mon now, here's a guy who used to tout the fact that he was natural, used to say he would never want to be 300lbs and sacrifice his shape and quality, now does every BB drug known to man and he has "character" cause he can't get his calfs to grow? If he had character he would still look awsome like he did in 97 and 98 before he went totally crazy with the drugs, Hulkster, you're love of ronnie was annoying but this statement makes me question your sanity..it's like you can't make a rational statement when it comes to him..

LuciusFox · « **Reply #57 on:** April 13, 2006, 07:15:27 AM »

Quote from: Ryan on April 13, 2006, 03:13:45 AM

Get my facts straight?? You are an idiot if you do not think Lee Priest has good calves

Lee Priest does NOT have good calves, only calves that LOOK good.

fearANDloathing · « **Reply #58 on:** April 13, 2006, 07:44:39 AM »

He's got 8 consecutive titles! Calves are overrated

natural al · « **Reply #59 on:** April 13, 2006, 07:44:59 AM »

Quote from: LuciusFox on April 13, 2006, 07:15:27 AM

Lee Priest does NOT have good calves, only calves that LOOK good.

what does that mean?

LuciusFox · « **Reply #60 on:** April 13, 2006, 07:45:20 AM »

Quote from: natural al on April 13, 2006, 07:44:59 AM

what does that mean?

Just joking

natural al · « **Reply #61 on:** April 13, 2006, 07:54:18 AM »

Quote from: LuciusFox on April 13, 2006, 07:45:20 AM

Just joking

alright then, I know you and alexxx are homies now so I thought maybe some of his ass backwards logic had rubbed off on you...

LuciusFox · « **Reply #62 on:** April 13, 2006, 07:58:19 AM »

Quote from: natural al on April 13, 2006, 07:54:18 AM

alright then, I know you and alexxx are homies now so I thought maybe some of his ass backwards logic had rubbed off on you...

No, I just had to write that because of the guy who said Lee Priest's calves weren't good because he was short

I mean, WTF?

Scimowser · « **Reply #63 on:** April 13, 2006, 01:36:44 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 11, 2006, 03:13:16 PM

Problem of course is, that his thighs turned into small hondas so even Dorian's calves would have looked tiny if they were on Ronnie's thighs..

you read that in flex didnt you.................go on, admit it

that was almost word for word what it said

as ive always said, his calves arent 100% real

LuciusFox · « **Reply #64 on:** April 13, 2006, 01:38:44 PM »

Quote from: Scimowser on April 13, 2006, 01:36:44 PM

you read that in flex didnt you.................go on, admit it that was almost word for word what it said

as ive always said, his calves arent 100% real

Every pro site injects. Post a pic of your calves

Scimowser · « **Reply #65 on:** April 13, 2006, 01:45:42 PM »

i dont train my calves or my legs so im not claiming theyre phenomenal or anything. Im happy with them as they are

this pics an old one cos ive never taken another pic of them................hate on

LuciusFox · « **Reply #66 on:** April 13, 2006, 01:50:26 PM »

Quote from: Scimowser on April 13, 2006, 01:45:42 PM

i dont train my calves or my legs so im not claiming theyre phenomenal or anything. Im happy with them as they are

this pics an old one cos ive never taken another pic of them................hate on

They are kind of high, like mine are, but I see separation and some thickness. Can you jump high?

Scimowser · « **Reply #67 on:** April 13, 2006, 01:55:09 PM »

yeah, sure can. My calves are 17.5" or so but have a good amount of definition for not training them. They look more cut these days. My legs used to overpower my upperbody which is wierd as i never trained them.

alexxx · « **Reply #68 on:** April 13, 2006, 01:56:38 PM »

Quote from: Scimowser on April 13, 2006, 01:55:09 PM

yeah, sure can. My calves are 17.5" or so but have a good amount of definition for not training them. They look more cut these days. My legs used to overpower my upperbody which is wierd as i never trained them.

Maybe you just didn't train hard enough..

LuciusFox · « **Reply #69 on:** April 13, 2006, 01:59:06 PM »

Quote from: Scimowser on April 13, 2006, 01:55:09 PM

yeah, sure can. My calves are 17.5" or so but have a good amount of definition for not training them. They look more cut these days. My legs used to overpower my upperbody which is wierd as i never trained them.

You and I both have the leaper's calves, but yours have good mass, as well. I reckon mine are around 15 inches or so.

Scimowser · « **Reply #70 on:** April 13, 2006, 02:10:46 PM »

my quads arent too bad either, theyve always been a good size and cut. I often wonder what they'd grow to if i trained them with the right diet

LuciusFox · « **Reply #71 on:** April 13, 2006, 02:13:10 PM »

Quote from: Scimowser on April 13, 2006, 02:10:46 PM

my quads arent too bad either, theyve always been a good size and cut. I often wonder what they'd grow to if i trained them with the right diet

Train them, man! I don't want you looking like Charles Atlas

KevinP85 · « **Reply #72 on:** April 13, 2006, 04:08:53 PM »

Quote from: Scimowser on April 13, 2006, 01:55:09 PM

yeah, sure can. My calves are 17.5" or so but have a good amount of definition for not training them. They look more cut these days. My legs used to overpower my upperbody which is wierd as i never trained them.

Pretty decent calves for not training them. How tall are you by the way?

Scimowser · « **Reply #73 on:** April 14, 2006, 10:45:57 AM »

cheers mate, im just over 6'1

Croatch · « **Reply #74 on:** April 14, 2006, 01:40:17 PM »

You don't train legs? No way!

Author Topic: Why are Ronnie's calves so small? (Read 13920 times)

suckmymuscle