Author Topic: RUHL - 2004 Arnold  (Read 1709 times)

Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
RUHL - 2004 Arnold
« on: December 28, 2017, 05:43:20 PM »
Not 2002 NOC massive but still one of his better showings. I believe he was having injury problems around this time, quad tear at some point but I can't tell... Jay looked like shit at this show, Cormier should have won.

Matt

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16693
  • YouTube FitnessByMatt
Re: RUHL - 2004 Arnold
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2017, 05:47:54 PM »
I think that was when Gunter placed 4th, and Ruhl, 5th?  And a female poster - possibly CQ - said that Ruhl was the "better big man" at that show.  Now to check the contest results, to see how closely I remembered that, or if I was totally wrong.  ;D

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: RUHL - 2004 Arnold
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2017, 06:54:25 PM »
Not 2002 NOC massive but still one of his better showings. I believe he was having injury problems around this time, quad tear at some point but I can't tell... Jay looked like shit at this show, Cormier should have won.

I know that I am in the minority, but he never impressed me. The man weighed 276-282 pounds and was huge, but he was out of proportion. His shoulders were too pointy (synthol). He had no triceps to speak of. His biceps also looked to be filled with oil. Put him next to a PRE-Synthol Nasser El Sonbaty (same height and weight) and I'll take Nasser every time and twice on Sunday.

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24665
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: RUHL - 2004 Arnold
« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2017, 08:28:32 PM »
I know that I am in the minority, but he never impressed me. The man weighed 276-282 pounds and was huge, but he was out of proportion. His shoulders were too pointy (synthol). He had no triceps to speak of. His biceps also looked to be filled with oil. Put him next to a PRE-Synthol Nasser El Sonbaty (same height and weight) and I'll take Nasser every time and twice on Sunday.


A little odd that he would load synthol into his delts & Bi’s yet not into his Triceps.

BSN

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2878
Re: RUHL - 2004 Arnold
« Reply #4 on: December 28, 2017, 11:36:49 PM »
.

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33006
  • Nasser Endorses Trump 🇺🇸
Re: RUHL - 2004 Arnold
« Reply #5 on: December 29, 2017, 11:40:23 PM »
Markus had some big thighs. Quads were huge.

QuietYou

  • Guest
Re: RUHL - 2004 Arnold
« Reply #6 on: December 30, 2017, 06:24:35 AM »
Not 2002 NOC massive but still one of his better showings. I believe he was having injury problems around this time, quad tear at some point but I can't tell... Jay looked like shit at this show, Cormier should have won.

Ruhl looks amazing in these IMO. Complete mass monster with tons of muscle.

Rascal full

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3981
Re: RUHL - 2004 Arnold
« Reply #7 on: December 30, 2017, 06:31:44 AM »
Ruhl looks amazing in these IMO. Complete mass monster with tons of muscle.

I agree, I am surprised Ruhl doesn't have more titles to his name and a bigger name altogether in the industry. Can't remember him pushing supplements over the years, perhaps he values his dignity too high for what they were offering to pay.

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42519
  • Getbig!
Re: RUHL - 2004 Arnold
« Reply #8 on: December 30, 2017, 06:57:42 AM »
Not 2002 NOC massive but still one of his better showings. I believe he was having injury problems around this time, quad tear at some point but I can't tell... Jay looked like shit at this show, Cormier should have won.
                                     he always looked like he was ready to expel some noxious odors.
F

robcguns

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20124
  • Founder of the proud straight white male movement
Re: RUHL - 2004 Arnold
« Reply #9 on: December 30, 2017, 07:02:31 AM »
Biggest freakiest bodybuilder ever.To me should have won multiple Os.Biceps,chest,shoulders,quads and calves above the rest.triceps look subpar due to insane bicep peaks and monstrous shoulders.

QuietYou

  • Guest
Re: RUHL - 2004 Arnold
« Reply #10 on: December 30, 2017, 07:13:50 AM »
I know that I am in the minority, but he never impressed me. The man weighed 276-282 pounds and was huge, but he was out of proportion. His shoulders were too pointy (synthol). He had no triceps to speak of. His biceps also looked to be filled with oil. Put him next to a PRE-Synthol Nasser El Sonbaty (same height and weight) and I'll take Nasser every time and twice on Sunday.

His shoulders weren't fully due to "synthol" as if you knew what he shot into his delts  ::)


He had amazing shoulder genetics and he always had top 3 shoulders on whatever stage he was on. He was always one of if not the biggest on the stage as well all while being in great shape. Ruhl was UNDERRATED throughout his bodybuilding career. A fan favorite for sure although the judges sometimes gave him shit.

His triceps were weak and he had weak arm genetics in general. But he had a way better back than nasser and probably had physically bigger quads. Nasser had tons of oils in his biceps as well don't be fooled. It's hard to have a better chest than Ruhl as well.

Shawnwhite

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 64
Re: RUHL - 2004 Arnold
« Reply #11 on: December 30, 2017, 08:11:21 AM »
He's awesome