Author Topic: MONSTERS!!! Post your best pics! (Read 34837 times)

gibberj2 · « **Reply #125 on:** April 12, 2006, 01:38:46 PM »

Nah man Ruhl's are bigger. Ruhl wins in traps, chest, biceps and calves. Ronnie wins in triceps, legs, and back and maybe even in abs. Ronnie has ugly abs but Ruhl is refrigerator shaped.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #126 on:** April 12, 2006, 01:47:32 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on April 12, 2006, 01:38:46 PM

Nah man Ruhl's are bigger. Ruhl wins in traps, chest, biceps and calves. Ronnie wins in triceps, legs, and back and maybe even in abs. Ronnie has ugly abs but Ruhl is refrigerator shaped.

Perfect example of Ronnie's traps appearing small from the front !!

FREAKgeek · « **Reply #127 on:** April 12, 2006, 01:50:04 PM »

Ruhl doesn't have better biceps

alexxx · « **Reply #128 on:** April 12, 2006, 01:50:58 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on April 12, 2006, 01:38:46 PM

Nah man Ruhl's are bigger. Ruhl wins in traps, chest, biceps and calves. Ronnie wins in triceps, legs, and back and maybe even in abs. Ronnie has ugly abs but Ruhl is refrigerator shaped.

Bullshit! Coleman beats him on everysingle bodypart! ...except calves..

The Showstoppa · « **Reply #129 on:** April 12, 2006, 01:55:09 PM »

Ronnie has some of the best biceps EVER. No way Ruhl's are better.

Hulkster · « **Reply #130 on:** April 12, 2006, 01:56:06 PM »

if Ronnie had given a most muscular in any other year other than 2004 markus would have been CRUSHED:

and this is offseason shape!

(and this is also my contribution to the "monsters" thread).

and no way does markus have better biceps than Ronnie. Ronnie has probably the greatest biceps in history (along with every other bodypart- even calves and abs!

)

alexxx · « **Reply #131 on:** April 12, 2006, 02:03:00 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 12, 2006, 01:56:06 PM

if Ronnie had given a most muscular in any other year other than 2004 markus would have been CRUSHED:

and this is offseason shape!

(and this is also my contribution to the "monsters" thread).

and no way does markus have better biceps than Ronnie. Ronnie has probably the greatest biceps in history (along with every other bodypart- even calves and abs! )

WOW

No wonder all the bodybuilders on the Olympia stage just set their sights out for 2nd place!! Awesome thats the Ronnie I want to see more of!

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #132 on:** April 12, 2006, 02:06:48 PM »

Quote from: michael arvilla on April 12, 2006, 07:23:55 AM

your that skinny black guy in the "pictures section" right

(kinna looks like beetle juice from The Howard Stern show)

You're going to talk smack against this guy's body?... Uhm ok.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #133 on:** April 12, 2006, 02:10:26 PM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on April 12, 2006, 07:36:39 AM

yes mike that is my physique .. and im comfortble with it...

no need to photoshop.. or anything...

I thought he was joking with the photochop of himself, but seeing him take shots at you says something else. $:-\$

Hulkster · « **Reply #134 on:** April 12, 2006, 02:10:43 PM »

Quote from: alexxx on April 12, 2006, 02:03:00 PM

WOW No wonder all the bodybuilders on the Olympia stage just set their sights out for 2nd place!! Awesome thats the Ronnie I want to see more of!

those black and white ronnie shots of some of the best ever taken of him, too bad they are "little known" pics.

LuciusFox · « **Reply #135 on:** April 12, 2006, 02:15:28 PM »

Quote from: sarcasm on April 12, 2006, 01:28:16 PM

bullshit, Ronnie's are the same size and he squats all the time.

Meltdown.

whitewidow · « **Reply #136 on:** April 12, 2006, 02:19:08 PM »

Yeah- those black and white ronnie shots are insane some of the best- anybody got that pic of gaspari doing that most muscular?? the one where his skin looks nearly invisible?? as for meso- he shcools arvilla- who cares how big arvilla is he looks like a pile of shit- however he was right about the urkel comparison.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #137 on:** April 12, 2006, 02:31:50 PM »

I'm not in anyway in a position with my own body to be making fun of either of these two physiques so I wont.
But, with that same idea in play, I do question Mike's thinking that he has room to talk.
A posedown between Vince and Mike. If it's an ARMS contest, Mike wins.

whitewidow · « **Reply #138 on:** April 12, 2006, 02:46:47 PM »

LOL- yeah goodrum even beats out mike- mike was talking about meso- not goodrum. meso way better than both of these guys.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #139 on:** April 12, 2006, 03:21:19 PM »

Quote from: whitewidow on April 12, 2006, 02:19:08 PM

Yeah- those black and white ronnie shots are insane some of the best- anybody got that pic of gaspari doing that most muscular?? the one where his skin looks nearly invisible?? as for meso- he shcools arvilla- who cares how big arvilla is he looks like a pile of shit- however he was right about the urkel comparison.

This one ?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #140 on:** April 12, 2006, 03:25:00 PM »

Ah its this one !!

alexxx · « **Reply #141 on:** April 12, 2006, 03:26:15 PM »

Maybe its this one...

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #142 on:** April 12, 2006, 04:33:36 PM »

Quote from: Rami on April 12, 2006, 04:22:32 PM

What are they doing and how come there are pictures of them posing on the internet? Honestly, it doesn't even look like they work out. But they are aware they don't resemble bodybuilding in any way shape or form, right...?

No comment

LuciusFox · « **Reply #143 on:** April 12, 2006, 04:35:03 PM »

Quote from: Rami on April 12, 2006, 04:22:32 PM

What are they doing and how come there are pictures of them posing on the internet? Honestly, it doesn't even look like they work out. But they are aware they don't resemble bodybuilding in any way shape or form, right...?

Do they dwarf you?

Gordon_Gekko · « **Reply #144 on:** April 12, 2006, 07:28:47 PM »

Quote from: bailey on April 11, 2006, 09:13:49 PM

Not to mention semi hijaking your own thread by posting a picture of your shitty body with othe bodybuilders who look like shit in those pics, but still have physiques you dream of.
( Diet all you want you f-tard ) It aint gonna make a difference. You will just be a smaller version of your self. In other words,
Smaller fat,no muscle, saggy titted, concentration camp leg victim ( Can you imagine arvillas legs whe he loses 50 pounds ? Big fat upper body and the sticks for legs. They aint getting any bigger as he diets.
It's hopeless tool bag !!! Give It up. You love the attention to much though don't you.

I won't re-use the "M" word, but I really think some degree of stepping back and getting a grip on reality and a sense of perspective is probably in order here. I'm pretty sure that Mike is well aware of his limitations and is simply clowning. Of course I may be wrong, but it's just my opinion.

LyricTenor · « **Reply #145 on:** April 12, 2006, 07:46:19 PM »

Flex, although incredibly aesthetic, had a freaky back and freaky arms. (among other freaky body parts)

Dorian, IMO one of the greatest physiques ever and I say this fully supporting aesthics as the main criteria for bodybuilding.

gibberj2 · « **Reply #146 on:** April 12, 2006, 08:51:42 PM »

Ruhl's biceps are bigger than coleman's and pretty much anybody's. Ruhl's biceps are incredibly peaked and they attach at the lowest point like Larry Scott's.

phyxsius · « **Reply #147 on:** April 12, 2006, 09:14:02 PM »

MONSTERS!!!

Hulkster · « **Reply #148 on:** April 12, 2006, 09:37:34 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on April 12, 2006, 08:51:42 PM

Ruhl's biceps are bigger than coleman's and pretty much anybody's. Ruhl's biceps are incredibly peaked and they attach at the lowest point like Larry Scott's.

you picked a pretty bad shot of Ronnie's arms though.

Bigger is not necessarily better:

its the detail that Ronnie in his arms that sets him apart.

gibberj2 · « **Reply #149 on:** April 12, 2006, 09:45:45 PM »

i'm only talking about bicep size. nothing more. as far as arms go ruhl's triceps are totally flat.