i'm only talking about bicep size. nothing more. as far as arms go ruhl's triceps are totally flat.
Ruhl's biceps are bigger than coleman's and pretty much anybody's. Ruhl's biceps are incredibly peaked and they attach at the lowest point like Larry Scott's.
MONSTERS!!!
Flex, although incredibly aesthetic, had a freaky back and freaky arms. (among other freaky body parts)Dorian, IMO one of the greatest physiques ever and I say this fully supporting aesthics as the main criteria for bodybuilding.
Only women and homos should care what his butt looks like.
Flex's glutes always left me disappointed. Too soft.
I get the feeling that if I squeezed Ronnie's glutes, I would meet alot of resistance.
you picked a pretty bad shot of Ronnie's arms though.Bigger is not necessarily better:its the detail that Ronnie in his arms that sets him apart.
"bigger is not necessarily better".....maybe if Ronnie understood this the sport would not be filled with drug bloated, destended stomach having, skull size increasing guys who can barely tie thier shoes cause they are trying to "catch up" to Ronnie in the mass department...maybe it would have happened had Ronnie stayed at 250ish but he really sped it up when he drugged out to almost 300lbs...
I think you would too, you would resist getting your ass kicked after squeezing his ass, but would fail miserbly.
I'm not in anyway in a position with my own body to be making fun of either of these two physiques so I wont. But, with that same idea in play, I do question Mike's thinking that he has room to talk.A posedown between Vince and Mike. If it's an ARMS contest, Mike wins.
Jay again
Damn, I'm not a Jay fan or anything but he looks good in that picture. Almost as big as Alexxx.