Author Topic: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump  (Read 1459 times)


Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2018, 10:14:10 AM »
No one gives a rats ass what Ben Shapiro thinks

Anyone who is capable of reading can read the memos and draw their own conclusions


Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15021
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2018, 10:18:57 AM »
No one gives a rats ass what Ben Shapiro thinks

Anyone who is capable of reading can read the memos and draw their own conclusions



what are you talking about? Coach doesn't even read the articles he links to. Most of the time they counter his argument. It's the headlines that throw him off

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59766
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2018, 10:31:27 AM »
what are you talking about? Coach doesn't even read the articles he links to. Most of the time they counter his argument. It's the headlines that throw him off

I read every word. You obviously didn't. The dumbass indicted himself


On Thursday, contemporaneous memos written by then-FBI director James Comey regarding meetings with President Trump were revealed to Congress . . . and within minutes, were leaked to the media. There wasn’t much in the memos we hadn’t already heard from Comey, of course. But here’s what you need to know.

1. Comey Leaked The Memos To Prompt A Special Counsel In The First Place. After Comey’s firing, he leaked the memos to a “close friend” so that the press would see them, intending to prompt a special counsel investigation into his firing. The theory was that the memos showed that Comey was hot on Trump’s trail on the Russia investigation, and that Trump fired Comey in order to obstruct justice. Comey told the Senate Intelligence Committee in June 2017, “I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo with a reporter. I didn’t do it myself for a variety of reasons but I asked him to because I thought that might prompt the appointment of a special counsel.” But there’s nothing in the memos that suggests Trump was actually attempting to obstruct justice.


2. The Letter From The DOJ To Congress Suggests Portions Of The Memo Were Classified. Comey said he hadn’t broken the law by showing the memos to a third party, because they were unclassified personal “recollection.” But the letter from the DOJ to Congress states, “Therefore, pursuant to your request, we are providing the requested memoranda in both redacted and unredacted formats for your convenience. … The unredacted documents are classified, and we will provide those in a separate, secure transmittal to the House Security office tomorrow.” This seems to suggest that Comey was wrong about the level of classification the memos required, meaning he could have broken the law — although Comey says he only leaked one of the memos to his friend, and that one was unclassified.


3. The DOJ Seemingly Fibbed About The Importance Of The Memos. The DOJ refused to turn over the memos when requested under the Freedom of Information Act; they claimed that the release of the memos would interfere with the Mueller investigation. There’s nothing in the memos that seems to suggest this is true. And if it were true, why would the DOJ now release the memos to Congress, knowing full well that they would be leaked within minutes?

4. The Memos Don’t Suggest Obstruction. Upon release of the memos, Reps. Devin Nunes (R-CA), Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), and Trey Gowdy (R-SC) rightly tore into Comey. They stated that the memos “show the President made clear he wanted allegations of collusion, coordination, and conspiracy between his campaign and Russia fully investigated.” Furthermore, the memos demonstrate that Trump didn’t want the Russia election interference investigation ended, but the suggestion that he had engaged in lewd personal conduct. And as the Congressmen point out, “The memos also show former Director Comey never wrote that he felt obstructed or threatened.”


5. Comey Held Trump To A Different Standard Than Obama Officials. Comey has stated that he interfered in the Hillary Clinton email investigation in an unprecedented way because he felt that Attorney General Loretta Lynch had undercut the credibility of the DOJ. But he never wrote contemporaneous memos about it. He reserved that for Trump, as the Congressmen point out: “He chose not to memorialize conversations with President Obama, Attorney General Lynch, Secretary Clinton, Andrew McCabe or others, but he immediately began to memorialize conversations with President Trump. …These memos also lay bare the notion that former Director Comey is not motivated by animus.” Comey also never bothered to try to launch a special counsel investigation against Lynch and Clinton.

6. Comey Defended McCabe Repeatedly. Comey repeatedly defended his deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe from attacks by President Trump, and said that McCabe was professional. Now McCabe may be indicted for criminal activity for leaking material to the press without Comey’s permission or say-so.

The Comey memos don’t help Comey’s case. In fact, they hurt it rather badly. They don’t show us anything we didn’t already know, but they undercut the case that Comey was being pressured in any serious fashion by Trump. Trump isn’t wrong when he tweets:




Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2018, 10:34:11 AM »
I read every word. You obviously didn't. The dumbass indicted himself


On Thursday, contemporaneous memos written by then-FBI director James Comey regarding meetings with President Trump were revealed to Congress . . . and within minutes, were leaked to the media. There wasn’t much in the memos we hadn’t already heard from Comey, of course. But here’s what you need to know.

1. Comey Leaked The Memos To Prompt A Special Counsel In The First Place. After Comey’s firing, he leaked the memos to a “close friend” so that the press would see them, intending to prompt a special counsel investigation into his firing. The theory was that the memos showed that Comey was hot on Trump’s trail on the Russia investigation, and that Trump fired Comey in order to obstruct justice. Comey told the Senate Intelligence Committee in June 2017, “I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo with a reporter. I didn’t do it myself for a variety of reasons but I asked him to because I thought that might prompt the appointment of a special counsel.” But there’s nothing in the memos that suggests Trump was actually attempting to obstruct justice.


2. The Letter From The DOJ To Congress Suggests Portions Of The Memo Were Classified. Comey said he hadn’t broken the law by showing the memos to a third party, because they were unclassified personal “recollection.” But the letter from the DOJ to Congress states, “Therefore, pursuant to your request, we are providing the requested memoranda in both redacted and unredacted formats for your convenience. … The unredacted documents are classified, and we will provide those in a separate, secure transmittal to the House Security office tomorrow.” This seems to suggest that Comey was wrong about the level of classification the memos required, meaning he could have broken the law — although Comey says he only leaked one of the memos to his friend, and that one was unclassified.


3. The DOJ Seemingly Fibbed About The Importance Of The Memos. The DOJ refused to turn over the memos when requested under the Freedom of Information Act; they claimed that the release of the memos would interfere with the Mueller investigation. There’s nothing in the memos that seems to suggest this is true. And if it were true, why would the DOJ now release the memos to Congress, knowing full well that they would be leaked within minutes?

4. The Memos Don’t Suggest Obstruction. Upon release of the memos, Reps. Devin Nunes (R-CA), Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), and Trey Gowdy (R-SC) rightly tore into Comey. They stated that the memos “show the President made clear he wanted allegations of collusion, coordination, and conspiracy between his campaign and Russia fully investigated.” Furthermore, the memos demonstrate that Trump didn’t want the Russia election interference investigation ended, but the suggestion that he had engaged in lewd personal conduct. And as the Congressmen point out, “The memos also show former Director Comey never wrote that he felt obstructed or threatened.”


5. Comey Held Trump To A Different Standard Than Obama Officials. Comey has stated that he interfered in the Hillary Clinton email investigation in an unprecedented way because he felt that Attorney General Loretta Lynch had undercut the credibility of the DOJ. But he never wrote contemporaneous memos about it. He reserved that for Trump, as the Congressmen point out: “He chose not to memorialize conversations with President Obama, Attorney General Lynch, Secretary Clinton, Andrew McCabe or others, but he immediately began to memorialize conversations with President Trump. …These memos also lay bare the notion that former Director Comey is not motivated by animus.” Comey also never bothered to try to launch a special counsel investigation against Lynch and Clinton.

6. Comey Defended McCabe Repeatedly. Comey repeatedly defended his deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe from attacks by President Trump, and said that McCabe was professional. Now McCabe may be indicted for criminal activity for leaking material to the press without Comey’s permission or say-so.

The Comey memos don’t help Comey’s case. In fact, they hurt it rather badly. They don’t show us anything we didn’t already know, but they undercut the case that Comey was being pressured in any serious fashion by Trump. Trump isn’t wrong when he tweets:





so

who cares what Ben Shapiro thinks


Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59766
  • It’s All Bullshit

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2018, 10:42:55 AM »
https://twitter.com/gop/status/987384682307350530?s=21

I just got off the phone with Ben Shapiro and he said you are a coke sniffing ball washing homo



mazrim

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4438
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #9 on: April 20, 2018, 11:22:30 AM »
Comey is a complete dummy/destroyed anything left of his story, etc.

Still working apparently judging by several responses in this thread, though. Embarrassing.

Board_SHERIF

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7279
  • UK Independence Party
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #10 on: April 20, 2018, 11:27:02 AM »
The Dolt Comey believed by no one......except Tin Hat Losers
K

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #11 on: April 20, 2018, 11:29:28 AM »
Comey is a complete dummy/destroyed anything left of his story, etc.

Still working apparently judging by several responses in this thread, though. Embarrassing.

yeah, I'm hearing that on Faux News

Must be true

They would never lie to help Trump

That would be crazy

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15021
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #12 on: April 20, 2018, 11:31:59 AM »
The Dolt Comey believed by no one......except Tin Hat Losers

Psycho Trump believed by no one........except Trumptard morons

See how compelling an argument that makes? 

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15021
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2018, 11:33:02 AM »
Anyone who believes a word Trump says is too stupid to realize just how stupid they are to normal people...


We can do this all day.....

Board_SHERIF

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7279
  • UK Independence Party
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2018, 11:35:55 AM »
yeah, I'm hearing that on Faux News

Must be true

They would never lie to help Trump

That would be crazy

CNN + Fox + GOP + DemoCraps all do not believe him. It is like you and Agnostic007 are the only simpletons that do
K

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59766
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #15 on: April 20, 2018, 12:44:25 PM »
yeah, I'm hearing that on Faux News

Must be true

They would never lie to help Trump

That would be crazy

Yes, it must be because if it wasn’t for “faux” news you wouldn’t know any of this

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #16 on: April 20, 2018, 12:45:58 PM »
CNN + Fox + GOP + DemoCraps all do not believe him. It is like you and Agnostic007 are the only simpletons that do

LOL did you hear that on Faux News or Rash?

mazrim

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4438
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #17 on: April 20, 2018, 01:55:04 PM »
yeah, I'm hearing that on Faux News

Must be true

They would never lie to help Trump

That would be crazy
(sigh) Grasping feebly holding on to his dream/fantasy of Comey...

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #18 on: April 20, 2018, 02:03:20 PM »
(sigh) Grasping feebly holding on to his dream/fantasy of Comey...

LOL - what dream/fantasy are you imagining here?

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15754
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #19 on: April 24, 2018, 08:27:29 PM »
Comey's memo leak contact had 'special government employee' status at FBI

The Columbia law professor James Comey used as a go-between last year to leak the contents of sensitive memos to the media confirmed to Fox News on Tuesday that he previously worked as a “special government employee” (SGE) for Comey’s FBI on an unpaid basis.

The professor, Daniel Richman, confirmed the special status in response to an inquiry from Fox News, while referring other questions, including on the scope of his work, to the FBI.

"I did indeed have SGE status with the Bureau (for no pay)," Richman wrote in an email.

Richman emerged last year as the former FBI director’s contact for leaking memos documenting his private discussions with President Trump – memos that are now the subject of an inspector general review over the presence of classified material. Sources familiar with Richman’s status at the FBI told Fox News that he was assigned to "special projects" by Comey, and had a security clearance as well as badge access to the building. Richman’s status was the subject of a Memorandum of Understanding.

While Richman's portfolio included the use of encrypted communications by terror suspects, the sources said Richman also was sent talking points about the FBI's handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation. Those talking points attempted to compare and contrast Clinton's use of an unsecured personal server exclusively for government business with the case of retired Gen.David Petraeus, who shared classified information with his biographer and mistress Paula Broadwell, as well as the case brought against the late Sandy Berger. The former national security adviser under President Clinton pleaded guilty to the unauthorized removal and retention of classified material from the National Archives. 

Incidentally, another “special government employee” who has come under scrutiny was Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, among others, previously questioned Abedin's special status that allowed her to work at the Clinton State Department and private-sector entities at the same time.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/24/comeys-memo-leak-contact-had-special-government-employee-status-at-fbi.html

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25737
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #20 on: April 24, 2018, 08:30:56 PM »
No one gives a rats ass what Ben Shapiro thinks

Anyone who is capable of reading can read the memos and draw their own conclusions




When you don't respect another person's opinion or freedom of speech, you end up becoming a communist.
A

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #21 on: April 24, 2018, 11:30:41 PM »

When you don't respect another person's opinion or freedom of speech, you end up becoming a communist.

Where did I object to his freedom of speech?

As far as some requirement to respect someone's opinion

WTF you talking about Willis?

Moontrane

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5897
  • a Harris administration, together with Joe Biden
Re: Comey memos indict Comey not Trump
« Reply #22 on: April 25, 2018, 01:35:57 AM »

When you don't respect another person's opinion or freedom of speech, you might be or become  end up becoming a communist a progressive.

My take.