So I've been reading your posts/threads for a while now, and I have to say I've noticed a few motifs that haven't changed much in that time. You can feel free to disregard this post, as it's not relevant to this thread or bodybuilding, but I'm going to post it anyway and maybe it'll stir up some (civil) discussion about whether I'm right or wrong.
1) Your posts are verbose, employ above-average diction, and are generally painstakingly written to address everything raised in the post you're replying to. It's often ended with self-deprecating humor or some minor concession about how you've fallen short in some way but deal with it in a way that's rational, e.g. the references to opiates as a coping mechanism if ever necessary.
2) Your views about social issues and politics are generally center-right, sometimes borderline far right, but lack the prescriptions recommended by the hardcore racists and/or bigots of the board. So, while you're cavalier about references to the common denigratory term for Blacks, there's no pattern of personal hostility to any that post here or recommendations to bring about harm on others off the boards, famous or not. Axiomatically, you've out of sync with the left-to-hard left political currents that prevail in your country (and now the U.S. - to go by the recent demonstrations against firearms and illegal immigration incarcerations). That's interesting. It's also interesting you have a public fitness profile and a YouTube channel that to a certain extent depends on public interest in it, but you're not concerned about PR based on your posts here. That's kind of amusing and (some would think) impressive in terms of your nonchalance re the opinions of others.
3) You've taken a staggering amount of ribbing & teasing due to your alleged sexual proclivities with numerous women, yet no one allegedly involved as emerged to "out" you as often happens (e.g. with Piana and other famous men brought down by exes spilling the beans on blogs, sites, boards, etc). You're also just trolled a lot in general, though less so than in the past. You take it with stoicism and aplomb, opting to stay above direct replies that address the criticisms mentioned or personal attacks. What do you credit for that kind of olympian detachment? It's not the norm here.
4) You're in reasonably good shape, but not a bodybuilder by the common understanding of the term in the IFBB or its amateur offshoots. What got you interested in the industry enough to not only go through the hassle of explaining yourself to CBP at airports but actually flying out to bodybuilding expos to meet & greet or at least establish a footprint for yourself in a very saturated industry? Do you profit from it at all? Were you ever sponsored before? Seems like a lot of investment for relatively little in return, considering you're not a "fan" or a U.S. citizen just visiting a local show or bodybuilding event at little cost to yourself.
I think that's about it.
Great post!! Wow, love Kwon's posts, so it's cool to see you username was inspired by him - unless you are a Kwon account?
Anyway, to address your great posts:
[1] Opiates are the food of the Gods, and IMO, far less toxic than anything else. There is a reason why opiates are prescribed as medicine, while alcohol is not - the acute damage caused by opiates just isn't an issue. The issue is dependence and overdose. Dependence can be skirted by putting days/weeks/month [pick a period of time = or > 3 days and use it], but not all people are able to skirt dependence. And I really hope no one reads my posts and starts using opiates in any capacity as a result of my stating that the acute [one-time use] toxicity of this family of drugs is not very high, compared to others. The second issue is overdose - but that can be avoided if you do not consume the amount that would be required to cause overdose. I also heard that 85% of all opiate overdoses involve either intravenous [needle] use of opiates, or involve combination use with other depressants, such as benzodiazepines. So avoid those.
Avoidosing orally or nasally is still possible, but a person would likely puke far before that point. Either way, none of this is meant to condone opiate use - I'm just saying that for people who are responsible and who are concerned about their health, the acute toxicity from opiates is far lower than other substances. Again, this should only be internalized by those with low self-gratifying tendencies. Even then, plenty of seemingly restrained people have gone down the road of addiction, due to using drugs to handle physical or even psychological pain.
[2] In Canada, we only "tolerate" diversity because we live nowhere near it. Canada is 77% White, and all the White liberals who claim to tolerate diversity are doing so from a position comfortably far away from it. In other words, as has been alluded to by both myself and others, "The desire to live in a diverse society is correlated inversely with proximity to diversity." In other words, people in Canada who live far removed from the problems caused by diversity want more of it. No White people living in New York City or in Brazil want more diversity. In fact, my friend's brother [who it pains me to say, is an elementary school teacher] told me in 2014: "I want Canada to look like Brazil, where everyone gets along." LOL, please. Brazil is one of the most criminalized nations on the PLANET, with over 50,000 murders most years! Yet this idiot was seriously suggesting that Brazil was a model for lily-White and safe Canada to yearn for. What a moron. Of course he lives in an area in Thunder Bay called Westfort - his neighbourhood in particular is almost 100% White. So he is in NO POSITION to talk about "diversity". In fact, I want all leftists and liberals to take your views - and your hatred of me - and to shove it up your ass. Hypocrites!
Take Tim Fogarty and Primemuscle for example - both spend their time with their White boyfriends, and rant to me about how I'm not incorporating enough "diversity" in my life. In reality, if you did an analysis of the lives of all three of us, you would likely find that I have more diverse friends than either of them. First off, I am forced to interact with liberals constantly, because the majority of my city is liberal, and even on the racial or religious front, I have more diversity in my life. And I'm not saying that I want that - I WISH I could live with more like-minded people...it's just that all the like-minded people are in the closet, so it's hard to identify them. Either way, I couldn't care less what leftists have to say, and if they want me to incorporate more diversity in my life, they had better be prepared to use force to make me, and they had better be prepared to know I will physically defend myself if I am in such a situation. Of course everyone wants to see families stay together, but why do Mexicans and other Hispanics
risk their lives walking through desert with their children to get to the USA if the USA is so "oppressive"? That's what I LOVE about all the people who complain about White men, and want us removed from society - ALL of these losers are ADDICTED to the societies that we create. Take Vince Goodrum for example - what's stopping him from leaving the USA to move to Africa, or even to move to any number of Black ghettos in the USA? The fact is, he PREFERS living in a White male-ran city - he thinks it is SUPERIOR. It turns out both myself and Vince agree that White males produce better societies.
SO HOW DOES THAT MAKE ONLY ME THE WHITE SUPREMACIST?Everyone reading this prefers living in the parts of the world where White males exist in the largest concentrations. Any of the groups complaining - Black Lives Matter, various White female feminists groups, Antifa, etc, can leave our countries ANY TIME THEY WANT. But they refuse to, because they know damn well that White males produce the best societies.
I do not think most people do care about families being separated. Obviously, few to no people are going to go on record and say they would be ok with families being separated, and in general - few people will say they want to see families or children harmed. Does that mean that they want leftist models to be in practice? The fact remains, actions speak louder than words. People love White male-ran capitalist democracies. As to how much socialism is in those societies - there will only be enough that will not result in those societies collapsing. So maybe Canada's private sector is only 60% of the economy, but that is NOT proof that the 40% public sector is a good thing - it's just evidence that a capitalist society can still function with 40% socialism sucking it dry. Socialism is garbage.
As for guns, that is a moot point - how do leftists expect to confiscate 300 million guns from 80 million private gun owners in the USA? LOL!!!!!! Oh, and when you adjust for race, White Americans and White Canadians roughly commit the same level of homicide, at around 2.0 per 100,000 population per year. School shootings scare people because they are visceral, but they rarely happen - and they are a drop in the bucket in terms of the overall stats. They literally increase the homicide rate in the USA among White people from 2.0 to 2.000000000001 per 100,000. Again, who cares? This is just more evidence that people suck at math. And no matter how much (((the mainstream media))) wants to disarm the American population, IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. (((Lord Rothschild))) can go fuck himself.
This is already getting long, so I will post this, and reply to the next two points/questions in another reply.
