Author Topic: Trayvon Martin 2.0  (Read 25758 times)

Desolate

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4868
  • I dream of Gods
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #25 on: July 21, 2018, 02:01:54 AM »
I'm sensing that some negro do something stupid. ::)



seCrawler

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1312
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #27 on: July 21, 2018, 02:27:21 AM »
I'm curious about that as well.  If they are wrongfully parking in a handicapped space then they could have avoided the entire situation by parking in the correct space.  Time will tell.

That's a trend with a lot of these black fatalities.  Many of them could have been avoided if they would just stop ignoring the law and acting belligerent and violent. 

Obey the law.  Obey the lawful orders of police officers.  Don't resist arrest.  Don't attack people.  Do that and you'll stay out of prison and in all likelihood you'll stay alive.  Not rocket science.

Semi-similar incident several yrs ago.



The most interesting thing is the comment section.  Personally, I believe both incidents fall under Keep your Hands to Yourself Law but it seems debatable with posters.

muscleman-2017

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2151
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #28 on: July 21, 2018, 02:31:33 AM »
That old man isn't the guardian of handicap spots. If you see someone parking in those spots and you don't agree with it either call the cops or mind your own business.

Rubbish comment.

Cops aint gonna come out over a handicap park dispute.  

So who's gonna act on the issue?  Yeah someone just like this old dude, and fair enough.  There are legit people who need that spot.

Someone has to stand up for social decency and order. Not everyone is a pathetic chickenshit cowardly cuck who looks the other way and keeps walking.

werewolf operative

  • Guest
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #29 on: July 21, 2018, 03:15:22 AM »
Nothing good will come from this and he'll spend his life savings on attorneys along with forever watching his back.


BIG AL MCKECHNIE

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1700
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #30 on: July 21, 2018, 04:04:12 AM »
And don't hit or push elders. They are much weaker than normal.

Is the shooter not a guy in his 40's?    A wee inadequate chap but hardly an elder.

Twaddle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7312
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #31 on: July 21, 2018, 05:37:45 AM »
Was she given a citation for the illegal handicap parking?   ???

fredrollon

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 974
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #32 on: July 21, 2018, 05:49:28 AM »

Not even arrested and questioned. Wow..

Twaddle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7312
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #33 on: July 21, 2018, 05:55:46 AM »
Not even arrested and questioned. Wow..

Why would they arrest him?  What law did he break?   ???

R.A.M.

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1444
  • BOOM!! Take a Look at this hunk of Man.
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #34 on: July 21, 2018, 06:06:47 AM »
not sure if this story will grow legs and take off... the media is hardcore after President Trump right now. Russia yadda yadda yadda... paying off old playboy playmate yadda yadda yadda.

fredrollon

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 974
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #35 on: July 21, 2018, 06:20:28 AM »
Why would they arrest him?  What law did he break?   ???

Guess I'm not familiar with the "stand your ground" law.

I'd assumed police,when dealing with a shooting death, would,as a matter of routine,question the shooter with his lawyer present . And this would be the case even if the shooting appeared to be self-defense.

My mistake.

Pray_4_War

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15801
  • Thot Expert
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #36 on: July 21, 2018, 06:25:12 AM »
This attack would not have stopped if the guy didn't have a gun.  Homie looked like he was pulling up his shorts to get some more.

The family member that the black dude was "protecting" got out of the car too.  In all likelihood that person was planning to get hostile with the old guy as well.

Blacks are quite fond of beating people by committee.

Twaddle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7312
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #37 on: July 21, 2018, 06:29:18 AM »
This attack would not have stopped if the guy didn't have a gun.  Homie looked like he was pulling up his shorts to get some more.

The family member that the black dude was "protecting" got out of the car too.  In all likelihood that person was planning to get hostile with the old guy as well.

Blacks are quite fond of beating people by committee.


fredrollon

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 974
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #38 on: July 21, 2018, 07:45:21 AM »
And don't hit or push elders. They are much weaker than normal.

Is the shooter not a guy in his 40's?   A wee inadequate chap but hardly an elder.

Sounds like most Getbiggers tbf.

Zillotch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5668
  • the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #39 on: July 21, 2018, 07:50:47 AM »
the savage, hateful pieces of shit likely would have beaten that old man to death.. good for him, he had the balls to save his own life.

beakdoctor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7857
  • Royalty looks like a colostomy bag.
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #40 on: July 21, 2018, 07:57:32 AM »
good riddance.

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17083
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #41 on: July 21, 2018, 08:09:15 AM »
Did you read any of the comments on youtube? The guy was defending his girlfriend from the man. The old man should have minded his own business..I'm sure if you found someone yelling at your spouse and children, having a civilized conversation and respectfully disagreeing with him would be the last thing on your mind.

The YouTube comments seem like a credible source of information.

So you agree with the guy tackling  the old dude to the ground but you don't agree with a scared old man then defending himself?

The old man should have minded his own business, no question. But a 28 year old man should have been able to recognize if the old man was an actual threat to his family or if he was just a cantankerous old man.

In the case of an actual threat the driver should have moved away or the husband should have had them move and not left them alone.

Even if the old man had appeared after the guy went in the store and the father came out and saw him standing yelling outside the car if he really thought he was a threat he wouldn't have stop with pushing him to the ground, he would have made sure he didn't get his gun out.

He reacted emotionally and sadly it cost him his life,  regardless of the shooter going to jail.


BIG DUB

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2534
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #42 on: July 21, 2018, 08:25:46 AM »
The YouTube comments seem like a credible source of information.

So you agree with the guy tackling  the old dude to the ground but you don't agree with a scared old man then defending himself?

The old man should have minded his own business, no question. But a 28 year old man should have been able to recognize if the old man was an actual threat to his family or if he was just a cantankerous old man.

In the case of an actual threat the driver should have moved away or the husband should have had them move and not left them alone.

Even if the old man had appeared after the guy went in the store and the father came out and saw him standing yelling outside the car if he really thought he was a threat he wouldn't have stop with pushing him to the ground, he would have made sure he didn't get his gun out.

He reacted emotionally and sadly it cost him his life,  regardless of the shooter going to jail.

That old man was ARMED and the guy didn't see the gun as it was concealed...He was a threat to his family..

BIG DUB

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2534
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #43 on: July 21, 2018, 08:26:36 AM »

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17083
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #44 on: July 21, 2018, 08:35:42 AM »
That old man was ARMED and the guy didn't see the gun as it was concealed...He was a threat to his family..

So you agree with the father's actions of violence but you don't agree with the old man's actions of violence?

If the tackle would have killed the old man what would be your response?

As I said if he really believed the guy was a threat to his family he should have eliminated the threat and got his family out of there, so in that case he did his family a disservice.

It's strange that the threatening old man didn't carry out with the same actions on the family that he stopped shooting after firing on his attacker.

I understand wanting to protect your family, and if that's all this dude was doing he should have made sure he took care of the job and he would be alive today and the old man would be dead.


Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25844
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #45 on: July 21, 2018, 08:45:56 AM »
You don't push an applebee without consequences shoeshine.


Works both ways, Quaker.   In fact, you should push anyone......usually has unexpected consequences
A

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25844
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #46 on: July 21, 2018, 08:59:29 AM »
How exactly you know that, were you there when Trayvon was shot?

What comes to this situation, punk get what he deserve, end of story. Don't push people to the ground, means "don't give them any reason to use their right to defend themselves". Simple enough for you? No one have right to do what he did, but what he did gives a man a legal reason to defend himself by force. It wasn't bullet which killed him, it was stupidity. And bo ho hoo, weep weep, he had three children...so what? This could be the best way he could use to give his children's an example what they should not do in their life  ;D



George Zimmerman actively pursued a person he suspected was robbing homes ignoring what other officers on the phone advised and created the situation all because he was a young black man with a hoodie.  Fact is that Trayvon Martin was not guilty of any crime.  So what if he busted his nose....he was obviously fighting for his life.   George's continued issues with the law pretty much confirms that he was an asswipe.



This incident wasn't even really about race.   Man was yelling at the victim's wife and her husband came out and pushes him.  Guy pulls out a weapon to defend himself and the victim backs off....then he clearly shoots him out of anger.   This man already had gotten into previous arguments with other people.


That's the problem with guns.   Some people get them to defend themselves but forget about the "defend" part.   Civil court is going to tear him a new asshole.   
A

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17083
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #47 on: July 21, 2018, 09:03:08 AM »


George Zimmerman actively pursued a person he suspected was robbing homes ignoring what other officers on the phone advised and created the situation all because he was a young black man with a hoodie.  Fact is that Trayvon Martin was not guilty of any crime.  So what if he busted his nose....he was obviously fighting for his life.   George's continued issues with the law pretty much confirms that he was an asswipe.



This incident wasn't even really about race.   Man was yelling at the victim's wife and her husband came out and pushes him.  Guy pulls out a weapon to defend himself and the victim backs off....then he clearly shoots him out of anger.   This man already had gotten into previous arguments with other people.


That's the problem with guns.   Some people get them to defend themselves but forget about the "defend" part.   Civil court is going to tear him a new asshole.   

How do you know he shot him out of anger? What if he shot him out of fear, or maybe he was reacting in love?

Also which of the two had gotten into previous arguments with other people, the shover or the shooter?

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33201
  • Nasser Endorses Trump 🇺🇸
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #48 on: July 21, 2018, 09:08:27 AM »


George Zimmerman actively pursued a person he suspected was robbing homes ignoring what other officers on the phone advised and created the situation all because he was a young black man with a hoodie.  Fact is that Trayvon Martin was not guilty of any crime.  So what if he busted his nose....he was obviously fighting for his life.   George's continued issues with the law pretty much confirms that he was an asswipe.



This incident wasn't even really about race.   Man was yelling at the victim's wife and her husband came out and pushes him.  Guy pulls out a weapon to defend himself and the victim backs off....then he clearly shoots him out of anger.   This man already had gotten into previous arguments with other people.


That's the problem with guns.   Some people get them to defend themselves but forget about the "defend" part.   Civil court is going to tear him a new asshole.   

Trayvon Martin was not looking for trouble that night.... Zimmerman was looking to be a “hero”, and Zimmerman jumped to conclusions and he put Trayvon in a bad position. Trayvon sensed that he was being followed by an unstable man. And Trayvon attempted to deal with the fucked-up situation.

There is no doubt that Zimmerman is mentally unstable. Look at all the trouble that he has gotten into since then. He has a chip on his shoulder and is always getting himself into trouble.

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17083
Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
« Reply #49 on: July 21, 2018, 09:14:54 AM »
Okay I've gotten more details.

The "old man" is 47, and likely a jackass, for some reason I thought he was 67.

I can understand the father coming out and "defending" his family but once he made the decision to engage he should have made sure he eliminated any threat, especially considering the father was a Florida resident and should have been away of the concealed weapons law.
 
But there is a good chance he didn't know about the law because his girlfriend who was parked in a handicap spot said she didn't do anything wrong.

Horrible situation, this dude girlfriend parking in a handicap spot cost him his life.