What about HGH?
not enough good data yet. Most of what is published though is positive in wound healing. I'm a little suspicious however. Pharma has been attempting to market GH for everything but GH deficiency diseases since the 80s, and we're only just now starting to the get the curtain pulled back on all the negative effects on it. Give it another 10 years and i wont be surprised to see a complete 180 in results. Thats how steroids started out too - panacea! fountain of youth!... couple decades later, a few athletic scandals and their market options being evaporated by more specific drugs... woops look at all this negative data we chose not to publish before
as an aside, thats the real crime in science. People think pharma pays people off to make shit up, nah not how it works. The way it works is you omit data that doesnt get the result you are looking for while publishing what does.
