Kavanaugh's accuser from 38 years ago goes public

[Kwon3]

I haven't watched it yet, but how is he supposed to know what is motivating someone to lie about him? 

That's something no one knows but the accusers. But what I and judge Napolitano (who reviewed with her after the segment was over) and doubtless others were looking for was a Clarence Thomas-type rejection of those accusations supported by a proposal (speculation obviously) about why they're doing it, rather than knowing the actual answer. Righteous anger/indignation were missing. A lot of it seemed labored and scripted. Granted, the guy's under tremendous stress and he doesn't want to give the Dems more ammo by saying it's about Roe V. Wade or about MeToo-type feminism run amok, but there were better answers than the ones he gave throughout the interview. A lot of it was scripted and sounded canned or stock. Again, I hope he's cleared and I made this thread because I feel he's getting railroaded by the liberal media and their paymasters in Congress + an endless army of triggered snowflakes on social media, but this interview didn't help his case. It'll be on YouTube soon if it isn't already.

[Dos Equis]

That's something no one knows but the accusers. But what I and judge Napolitano (who reviewed with her after the segment was over) and doubtless others were looking for was a Clarence Thomas-type rejection of those accusations supported by a proposal (speculation obviously) about why they're doing it, rather than knowing the actual answer. Righteous anger/indignation were missing. A lot of it seemed labored and scripted. Granted, the guy's under tremendous stress and he doesn't want to give the Dems more ammo by saying it's about Roe V. Wade or about MeToo-type feminism run amok, but there were better answers than the ones he gave throughout the interview. A lot of it was scripted and sounded canned or stock. Again, I hope he's cleared and I made this thread because I feel he's getting railroaded by the liberal media and their paymasters in Congress + an endless army of triggered snowflakes on social media, but this interview didn't help his case. It'll be on YouTube soon if it isn't already.

Thanks.  I'll check it out. 

[chaos]

she said someone was there

all that person has to do is go under oath and say he wasn't there

that would actually help Kavanaugh so I'm sure you'd have no problem with that

4 "witnesses", 4 denials. LOL


http://thefederalist.com/2018/09/23/fourth-supposed-witness-kavanaugh-accusers-alleged-assault-says-didnt-happen/

[Kwon3]

4 "witnesses", 4 denials. LOL


http://thefederalist.com/2018/09/23/fourth-supposed-witness-kavanaugh-accusers-alleged-assault-says-didnt-happen/

The case against him is non-existent. Tucker Carlson just had a female guest at the opening of his show that said that when it comes to sexual assault allegations, the burden of proof being on the accuser no longer applies and men should have to prove themselves innocent or face the consequences. I'm not even kidding. Even he was stunned and speechless. I recommend you guys watch this episode (it's on right now and play against at 12 ET 9 PT) because he went on the strongest offensive against this culture of identity politics and man-hating rum amok I've ever seen on any Fox host's show.

[SOMEPARTS]

This really changes the reason for men videotaping their relations with women, haha....have to do it to cover your ass now from these liars. 24/7/365 cameras going from now on. 

[Dos Equis]

The case against him is non-existent. Tucker Carlson just had a female guest at the opening of his show that said that when it comes to sexual assault allegations, the burden of proof being on the accuser no longer applies and men should have to prove themselves innocent or face the consequences. I'm not even kidding. Even he was stunned and speechless. I recommend you guys watch this episode (it's on right now and play against at 12 ET 9 PT) because he went on the strongest offensive against this culture of identity politics and man-hating rum amok I've ever seen on any Fox host's show.

These people have lost their minds.   

[Kwon3]

Quite possibly the best episode of TCT I've ever seen, and I've been watching him since he started at CNN in the late 1990s.

His opening monologue spoke for so many of us out there...I felt every word of it. He was legitimately enraged at what's happening to this judge and America in general due to the lefty's endless chipping away at the Bill of Rights with its pickax of political correctness. Highly recommend watching it through, because he destroys Republicans as well.

[Agnostic007]

I did however just watch his interview with Martha MacCallum and I don't think it went very well for him. He refused to answer her a few times when she kept coming back to where these accusations are coming from, in terms of the motivation of his accusers. And there were a lot of other canned answers that referred to getting a fair hearing even if it wasn't strictly correlated to the question asked.

Hopefully his name will be cleared by the system, but I have doubts. The damage is done. The liberal media and the feminist groups won. Trump may have to drop him and find a woman instead.

I saw it as well. I got the feeling he was coached to stick to talking points. He did a LOT of repeating. If he is telling the truth, I think his handlers made a poor decision. I think several posters could have handled that interview much better, coming off genuine, honest and likable in the end. He did not lose one supporter with that interview but I highly doubt he gained any. There was nothing there to latch on to.   

[Agnostic007]

That's something no one knows but the accusers. But what I and judge Napolitano (who reviewed with her after the segment was over) and doubtless others were looking for was a Clarence Thomas-type rejection of those accusations supported by a proposal (speculation obviously) about why they're doing it, rather than knowing the actual answer. Righteous anger/indignation were missing. A lot of it seemed labored and scripted. Granted, the guy's under tremendous stress and he doesn't want to give the Dems more ammo by saying it's about Roe V. Wade or about MeToo-type feminism run amok, but there were better answers than the ones he gave throughout the interview. A lot of it was scripted and sounded canned or stock. Again, I hope he's cleared and I made this thread because I feel he's getting railroaded by the liberal media and their paymasters in Congress + an endless army of triggered snowflakes on social media, but this interview didn't help his case. It'll be on YouTube soon if it isn't already.

Should have read this before my previous post, you said it better

[Primemuscle]

But that person has no proof, either, if they even exist. I can get five people to say you molested me when I was 14. That mean it's true?

I had a great comeback, but decided it was too mean. You are welcome.

[Primemuscle]

I did however just watch his interview with Martha MacCallum and I don't think it went very well for him. He refused to answer her a few times when she kept coming back to where these accusations are coming from, in terms of the motivation of his accusers. And there were a lot of other canned answers that referred to getting a fair hearing even if it wasn't strictly correlated to the question asked.

Hopefully his name will be cleared by the system, but I have doubts. The damage is done. The liberal media and the feminist groups won. Trump may have to drop him and find a woman instead.

Looks like if you're a male and in the spotlight...you are fucked these days. More than 35 years ago, a women tried to molest me. I'd go after her except that it is too late because she is dead now. My step-dad caught her in the act and could have been a witness but for the fact that he died in the '70's. No matter, I survived.

[Primemuscle]

Libs in the Congress failed to derail the Kavanaugh nomination through conventional means and scrutiny of his legal record, and he passed every FBI background check, so now they've bet their entire desperate battle on the tried-and-tested method of pulling some obscure woman out of the garbage heap, dusting her off, and begging her for ANYTHING that could save their pathetic last-minute attempts to block a conservative from the court. I predict this will not only fail but blow up so hard in their faces that it'll knock down the rotten MeToo 'movement' whose shaky scaffolding can't survive a firm and hard rejection by the American people with a conscience and a brain in their heads. Of course, CNN just found its new topic for a week.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/16/california-professor-christine-ford-claims-kavanaugh-sexually-assaulted-her-it-derailed-me.html

Anything is possible, but I suspect it will take more than this fiasco to take down the Me Too folks. They are still on a roll.

[Primemuscle]

Why doesn't it surprise me that Kavanaugh's accuser is a "Professor" from the Bay Area (Palo Alto) LMFAO..hahaha!

You wish you could afford to live in Palo Alto. Chances are you couldn't get a job cleaning the toilets at the farm (otherwise known as Standford University).

[Primemuscle]

Lawyers made up the paper "presented" to the Democrats. Just BS. When Kavanaugh is in the Supreme court do you think he will remember what the Democrats did to him?

And if he does. what then?

[Primemuscle]

A bunch of men (?) weighing in on a possible sexual assault on a woman/girl.  Do you think anything we have to say would be taken seriously? Better buy yourself a cock-cage and give the key to your mom (not your priest). You could be next one to burn.

[Soul Crusher]

A bunch of men (?) weighing in on a possible sexual assault on a woman/girl.  Do you think anything we have to say would be taken seriously? Better buy yourself a cock-cage and give the key to your mom (not your priest). You could be next one to burn.

So women are supposed to just be allowed to make up any allegation at all and automatically we are suppose dto believe it?  Especially considering the 3 alleged witnesses - SHe NAMED - all say it never happed?   GTFO

[loco]

[James]

Quite possibly the best episode of TCT I've ever seen, and I've been watching him since he started at CNN in the late 1990s.

His opening monologue spoke for so many of us out there...I felt every word of it. He was legitimately enraged at what's happening to this judge and America in general due to the lefty's endless chipping away at the Bill of Rights with its pickax of political correctness. Highly recommend watching it through, because he destroys Republicans as well.

This!

[chaos]

I had a great comeback, but decided it was too mean. You are welcome.

Lol, too mean....

[Primemuscle]

So women are supposed to just be allowed to make up any allegation at all and automatically we are suppose dto believe it?  Especially considering the 3 alleged witnesses - SHe NAMED - all say it never happed?   GTFO

Hope you realize my post was meant to be sarcastic.

If Ford is making this up and she sticks to her story under oath and is found out, she's risking going to jail.

Speaking of jail time, my son-in-law just told me that Cosby got 3 to 10 years in prison. The judge denied bail pending an appeal. Sad.

[Kwon3]

It seems prime got his new shipment of Depends last night and went on a bit of a rampage in my thread.

For the convenience of others and to keep the thread from becoming cluttered, can I ask you to condense all your replies into one post? It's pretty easy to do, just scroll down the page below the reply box and quote the people you want to reply to in one post. That way we don't have 8 replies that could've been contained in one. Thanks, gramps. And you're still an old pedophile.  

I had a great comeback, but decided it was too mean. You are welcome.

I doubt it'll be anywhere as hilarious as these two back-to-back frustrated old man meltdowns

Hallelujah! Praise the Lord! Move on fuck-head, you'll so quickly be forgotten, it will be like you never existed. Amen.

Kwon3 relishes calling folks pedophiles. It's all an enormous Getbig joke to him. He is disgustingly subhuman. Call him on it and he counters that he's just pulling your chain. Bullshit! "The lady doth protest too much, methinks" He is obsessed...and mentally deeply disturbed.

[Primemuscle]

It seems prime got his new shipment of Depends last night and went on a bit of a rampage in my thread.

For the convenience of others and to keep the thread from becoming cluttered, can I ask you to condense all your replies into one post? It's pretty easy to do, just scroll down the page below the reply box and quote the people you want to reply to in one post. That way we don't have 8 replies that could've been contained in one. Thanks, gramps. And you're still an old pedophile.  
I doubt it'll be anywhere as hilarious as these two back-to-back frustrated old man meltdowns

Say something that would make me want to do anything for you. I owe you no favors. Good to know you don't like clutter in 'your' threads.

[Kwon3]

Say something that would make me want to do anything for you. I owe you no favors. Good to know you don't like clutter in 'your' threads.

It was a suggestion, not a demand. If you want to post like an asshole and ignore etiquette, be my guest. It confirms everyone's low opinion of you on here as a child-fiddling dementia-stricken liberal imbecile who shares everything that's on his mind regardless of whether people want to read it or not, and fucks up threads with cluttered posts to boot. And yes, it is my thread, since I made it. I realize a communist doesn't understand that concept, since you think everyone should own everything everyone else has. If you don't like it, make your own.

[Kwon3]

Christine Ford, through her lawyers, are now objecting to their very condition that they demanded in the first place: A non-senator female lawyer to ask her the questions that would normally be asked by the committee, as was done in the Hill case (and in all cases, normally).

She's now claiming she wouldn't be comfortable talking to a prosecutor because she doesn't feel she's on "trial".

See? Blackmailers doing what blackmailers do best: Changing the rules as many times as they see fit to avoid taking responsibility for their own repulsive actions. Republicans dropped the ball. They should never have accommodated her in any way and simple done an up or down vote last week. Pandering to liars never works.

https://www.infowars.com/hearing-in-doubt-christine-fords-lawyer-rips-senate-plan-to-have-prosecutor-ask-questions-not-fair-and-respectful/

[Grape Ape]

Haven't paid attention - did they give in to Kavanaugh going first and not being able to defend himself after her testimony?