Kavanaugh's accuser from 38 years ago goes public

[Princess L]

[ Invalid YouTube link ]

[polychronopolous]

Kavanaugh's replacement on D.C. Circuit could get confirmed by Christmas, Grassley says



Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley said Wednesday the Senate could confirm a replacement for Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh’s old seat on the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. by the end of the year.

The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is seen as the second highest court in the country, since many of the federal government’s legal challenges make their way through the docket.


“If we received it right now, the answer is yes, but just before Christmas. So it kind of depends upon how long we’ll be in session,” Mr. Grassley, Iowa Republican, told conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt on Wednesday.

The White House has not yet sent over a nominee to the Judiciary Committee to replace the seat left vacant following Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

Sen. John Kennedy, Louisiana Republican, said he has a feeling the White House will be sending over a name soon.


Meanwhile, Sen. Chris Coons, Delaware Democrat, laughed at the notion the GOP would push through a replacement for Justice Kavanaugh’s old seat so quickly.

‌
“That is the first I have heard of it. That would strike me as an ambitious schedule,” he said.

Currently there are seven Democratic appointed active judges on the D.C. Circuit, while there are only three GOP appointed jurists. Just one, Judge Greg Katsas, was appointed by President Trump.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/10/chuck-grassley-kavanaughs-replacement-could-get-co/

[Princess L]

It must be a very expensive property area
That looks a bit like a mobile home type place.

I don’t know property prices over there - maybe that’s a desirable residence.

?


3872 Duncan Pl
Palo Alto, CA 94306

[SOMEPARTS]

?


3872 Duncan Pl
Palo Alto, CA 94306

4, 6, 12, 9, 5 ...

[Soul Crusher]

4, 6, 12, 9, 5 ...

This is why I love getbig.    Lol.

[obsidian]

4, 6, 12, 9, 5 ...

lol - which one is 1?!!

[Primemuscle]

Millions will do like either of us.
At the end of the day on Nov 6, we'll count the totals and see who wins.
Pretty simple.

Yes, but it's so much fun to spin our wheels in the meantime. 

[Primemuscle]

For some reason this dickless buttplug pisses me off way more than prime or straw. He's so smug and self-assured in his willful ignorance, and it's not even about politics. He married NINE TIMES. HE is the reason why women are such obnoxious whores anymore. He makes mockery of marriage. He's so fucking stupid that reading his posts is like punching yourself in the face repeatedly on purpose. And unlike those two other liberal nuthuggers, he's not even good for a laugh. He's just fucking annoying.

We are the brave!

[Primemuscle]

We'll riot in the streets, block traffic, destroy buildings, attack demoncratic representatives, etc, etc. Just like you dummycrats have done

Nothing new going on here.

[Primemuscle]

It must be a very expensive property area
That looks a bit like a mobile home type place.

I don’t know property prices over there - maybe that’s a desirable residence.

Living in Palo Alto is not affordable. The median home value in Palo Alto is $3,270,200. Palo Alto home values have gone up 14.0% over the past year and Zillow predicts they will rise 9.3% within the next year. The median list price per square foot in Palo Alto is $1,510, which is higher than the San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara Metro average of $690. The median income is $137,000.

[chaos]

Living in Palo Alto is not affordable. The median home value in Palo Alto is $3,270,200. Palo Alto home values have gone up 14.0% over the past year and Zillow predicts they will rise 9.3% within the next year. The median list price per square foot in Palo Alto is $1,510, which is higher than the San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara Metro average of $690. The median income is $137,000.

137k buying a 3.3m home? I don't think so.
At any rate, why did she need two front doors? To rent one side of her house out to help pay her mortgage?

[Agnostic007]

Thanks for that link
A very interesting article
I’d like to see Ford have the courage to press charges against Kavanaugh
Or Have Charges Against her for lying & trying to wreck an innocent man’s
Life & his family’s & his career.

The Democraps & Their Supporters have Sunk to new depths
We can but hope decent minded people recognise this & turn away
From them by not voting for them.

This undermines the whole premises

[Primemuscle]

137k buying a 3.3m home? I don't think so.
At any rate, why did she need two front doors? To rent one side of her house out to help pay her mortgage?

Once again, a simple statistical reply gets misrepresented. It behooves you to read illuminatti's post before jumping in with your irrelevant response. Where did I ever suggest these figures applied to any particular situation? It was a simple answer to the question as to whether Palo Alto is an expensive place to live.

[illuminati]

This undermines the whole premises

Why do you say that then ? Explain please

Why isn’t she perusing a criminal case against him then ?

[Yamcha]

Tick Tock....

[Kwon3]

Why do you say that then ? Explain please

Why isn’t she perusing a criminal case against him then ?

Lately, Agnostic no longer speaks in whole sentences or cogent, well-reasoned arguments. He's now reached Mao Zedong-level enlightenment, where a word, a nod of the head, a subtle hand gesture, and a deep rhetorical question keeps his mesmerized audience locked to him with rapt attention, trying to discern every movement and sign in order to decipher the meaning of his inscrutible responses.

Try to see it this way. We're Matt Damon and he's Robbie Coltrane in this scene:

[Primemuscle]

Why do you say that then ? Explain please

Why isn’t she perusing a criminal case against him then ?

A senate hearing is not the same as criminal procedure. The rules are different. It's pretty clear Ford doesn't have enough evidence against Kavanaugh to prevail. Depending which source you believe, the statute of limitations would seem to preclude charges being filed. It would fall under the laws of Montgomery County, Maryland. Moreover, Christine Blasey Ford's attornies indicated she has no intention of pursuing criminal charges against Bret Kavanaugh.

[Kwon3]

A senate hearing is not the same as criminal procedure. The rules are different. It's pretty clear Ford doesn't have enough evidence against Kavanaugh to prevail. Depending which source you believe, the statute of limitations would seem to preclude charges being filed. It would fall under the laws of Montgomery County, Maryland. Moreover, Christine Blasey Ford's attornies indicated she has no intention of pursuing criminal charges against Bret Kavanaugh.

The rules are not different. The golden rule and the one on which our country was founded was the presumption of innocence. It doesn't matter if it's a criminal court or a public hearing. You fucking morons on the left seem to have real problems understanding this.

[illuminati]

A senate hearing is not the same as criminal procedure. The rules are different. It's pretty clear Ford doesn't have enough evidence against Kavanaugh to prevail. Depending which source you believe, the statute of limitations would seem to preclude charges being filed. It would fall under the laws of Montgomery County, Maryland. Moreover, Christine Blasey Ford's attornies indicated she has no intention of pursuing criminal charges against Bret Kavanaugh.

Exactly - You don’t say there not the same  Really
She & The Democraps did the senate route
1, because the burden of proof upon her was no existent
2, to derail & stop him getting elected

Of Course she never had any intention of going with criminal charges
She would’ve opened herself up to all sorts of potential problems.

Piece of crap she is & her idiot supporters.

[Agnostic007]

Why do you say that then ? Explain please

Why isn’t she perusing a criminal case against him then ?

It's 38 years old. The only eye witness other than the suspect is the suspects best friend. It's an unwinnable case. Doesn't mean it didn't happen. Just means it can't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.  The Judicial hearing wasn't a court room and there is no reasonable doubt standard. She wanted them to know what he did to her when he was 17.

[illuminati]

It's 38 years old. The only eye witness other than the suspect is the suspects best friend. It's an unwinnable case. Doesn't mean it didn't happen. Just means it can't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.  The Judicial hearing wasn't a court room and there is no reasonable doubt standard. She wanted them to know what he did to her when he was 17.

You know it as well as I do
It’s a load of Bollocks
She hadn’t a clue what she was on about
Let alone who it was.

I can only hope women from 38yrs ago don’t suddenly spring up accusing you
Of thing she says you did to her - Just to Let People Know... 

And how would you get out of that one then. You couldn’t as he couldn’t.
Try putting yourself in his position- You’d likely have a very different view & attitude.

[Agnostic007]

You know it as well as I do
It’s a load of Bollocks
She hadn’t a clue what she was on about
Let alone who it was.

I can only hope women from 38yrs ago don’t suddenly spring up accusing you
Of thing she says you did to her - Just to Let People Know... 

And how would you get out of that one then. You couldn’t as he couldn’t.
Try putting yourself in his position- You’d likely have a very different view & attitude.

No, we disagree on this one. I don't agree with you and pretend I don't agree with you.

[Kwon3]

It's 38 years old. The only eye witness other than the suspect is the suspects best friend. It's an unwinnable case. Doesn't mean it didn't happen. Just means it can't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.  The Judicial hearing wasn't a court room and there is no reasonable doubt standard. She wanted them to know what he did to her when he was 17.

The only other eye witness also claims she wasn't there and can't remember anything about her friend's story. That didn't help, either.

Ford knew this was an unwinnable case. That was never the point. She wanted a ton of money and a plump book deal. Her boring, nothing-ever-happens existence as an obscure college professor has been traded for something a lot more fun and exciting.

[illuminati]

No, we disagree on this one. I don't agree with you and pretend I don't agree with you.

If those accusations were levelled at you
How would you & your wife family deal with it ?
Say it was true & accept it just because the accuser says so?

[Kwon3]

If those accusations were levelled at you
How would you & your wife family deal with it ?
Say it was true & accept it just because the accuser says so?

We've been over this already over a month.

He claims it'll never happen because he never did anything wrong. But if it does, he'll call on an ex-colleague of his, a female detective with a lot of experience, who'll be his character reference. If that doesn't cut it, all his ex-coworkers will pitch in. And if that's not enough, his years as a sexual assault survivor team member will surely convince skeptics that he couldn't possibly be guilty, since cops who hunt predators are never predators themselves.

I got news for him. When they're ready for your white ass, even a 30 year career in law enforcement can't help you. A few accusations later, you're grimy and fit for an orange jumpsuit in the eyes of the community, whether true or not.