Brett Kavanaugh - Accused of Sexual Misconduct

[funk51]

So if he doesn't remember it because he was so out of it, when they ask if he assaulted Ford and he says no and the polygraph confirms it can we fall back on polygraphs being inaccurate?

                                           if that's how you want to spin it it's up to you...how will uncle fester spin it..

[Dave D]

That’s what I mean. It’s endless. They want this to last until November and then to renominate Merrick Garland. It’s payback for 2016, nothing else.

I guess the real question is where do we draw the line. Let's say Kavanaugh is 100% guilty of what he's being accused of. So what do we do? Revoke his nomination?

What becomes the standard background check then? Where is the line drawn, no further than acts committed when an individual was 16, 15, 11? Do we do this for everyone? Should we check Fords background? Theoretically, as a collegiate professor,  she will have more influence on a society and culture than a supreme court judge.

What if during the course of this investigation we find out Ford lied about something in high school or cheated on an assignment in college? What does that do to her credibility?

I already know we don't trust the FBI so who is the completely independent council that can do an unbasised investigation on an unreported assault from 1982,that according to records was brought up in therapy sessions in 2013?

[Dave D]

                                           if that's how you want to spin it it's up to you...how will uncle fester spin it..

I'm just asking where do we draw the line. I'm not spinning anything.

If you hate Kavanaugh and think what he is alleged to have done in 1982 disqualifies him from the supreme court I'm fine with that. But what is the standard?

How are judges picked then? Will it be based on track record, political affiliation, documented philanthropy?

Should we rewrite the law and have the position voted in by the public with term limits?

What is the solution you suggest?

[2ND COMING]

If there is no sperm, you must confirm.

[funk51]

I'm just asking where do we draw the line. I'm not spinning anything.

If you hate Kavanaugh and think what he is alleged to have done in 1982 disqualifies him from the supreme court I'm fine with that. But what is the standard?

How are judges picked then? Will it be based on track record, political affiliation, documented philanthropy?

Should we rewrite the law and have the position voted in by the public with term limits?

What is the solution you suggest?

                   votes by the people with term limits... i thought kavanaugh was alright, till he showed himself to be a whiny crybaby..i don't hate trump either i just think he isn't qualified to lead this country as far as temperament and experience..... any minute i expect him to order congress to bake cupcakes and go out and sell them to see who can raise the most cash.... it's like watching a bad reality tv show everyday...

[funk51]

                   votes by the people with term limits... i thought kavanaugh was alright, till he showed himself to be a whiny crybaby..i don't hate trump either i just think he isn't qualified to lead this country as far as temperament and experience..... any minute i expect him to order congress to bake cupcakes and go out and sell them to see who can raise the most cash.... it's like watching a bad reality tv show everyday...

                       to expand on this have congress give us 6 choices no campaigning just a presentation of what each judge brings to the table as far as experience and record.. plus their stand on a number of key issues...let the people decide.... not that hard..

[Dave D]

                       to expand on this have congress give us 6 choices no campaigning just a presentation of what each judge brings to the table as far as experience and record.. plus their stand on a number of key issues...let the people decide.... not that hard..

I'm fine with that BUT don't forgot the same people voting voted Trump into office.

[funk51]

I'm fine with that BUT don't forgot the same people voting voted Trump into office.

               not really the electoral college vote got him in...rotten  Hillary actually got over 2 million more votes then the trumpster....after all gov't is supposed to be for the people by the people.............. they just failed to include the word rich in front of people...

[Dave D]

               not really the electoral college vote got him in...rotten  Hillary actually got over 2 million more votes then the trumpster....after all gov't is supposed to be for the people by the people.............. they just failed to include the word rich in front of people...

Lol sorry Funk I didn't realize you have been trolling in this thread.

The US has used the electoral college since 1864, if we didn't do anything to change this after the 2000 election results why would someone be upset the same rules are in place 16 years later.

The people of the United States voted and their results elected the president.

Good stuff by you in this thread, you really got me bro.

[Princess L]

               not really the electoral college vote got him in...rotten  Hillary actually got over 2 million more votes then the trumpster....after all gov't is supposed to be for the people by the people.............. they just failed to include the word rich in front of people...

You really want California to decide who becomes president?

[Princess L]

You really want California to decide who becomes president?

Lol sorry Funk I didn't realize you have been trolling in this thread.

The US has used the electoral college since 1864, if we didn't do anything to change this after the 2000 election results why would someone be upset the same rules are in place 16 years later.

The people of the United States voted and their results elected the president.

Good stuff by you in this thread, you really got me bro.

Yes, it's gotta be a troll job.

[funk51]

You really want California to decide who becomes president?

    what's your problem with California, it's the mecca of bodybuilding and the movie industry after all  

[Humble Narcissist]

                   votes by the people with term limits... i thought kavanaugh was alright, till he showed himself to be a whiny crybaby..i don't hate trump either i just think he isn't qualified to lead this country as far as temperament and experience..... any minute i expect him to order congress to bake cupcakes and go out and sell them to see who can raise the most cash.... it's like watching a bad reality tv show everyday...

Trump has done more positive things for this country in 2 years than most presidents do in 2 terms.

1) Shredding a terrible NAFTA deal and creating the new trade agreement with Canada and Mexico (the globalists are shitting their pants over).

2) Pulling out of the stupid Climate Accord (globalists also shitting over).

3) Lower taxes creating new higher paying jobs and more money in everyone's pocket.

4) Exposing the corrupt media everyday.

5) Putting 1 and soon to be 2 new supreme court justices who aren't liberal activists who want to fundamentally change our constitution.

6) Working to solve the North Korean problem and soon Iranian problem.

7) China now lowering tariffs on our goods.

Eliminating the fine for the terrible health care fiasco Obama put in.


etc, etc, etc.

[funk51]

Yes, it's gotta be a troll job.

                           you got me ,,,, just trying to flesh out a promising thread by taking the other side of the issue......our opinions are like assholes everyone has one..... big government is going to do what they are going to do anyway... despite what you, I , kwon, or coach thinks or says...... i don't take what is said in the main board too seriously and neither should you..

[funk51]

Trump has done more positive things for this country in 2 years than most presidents do in 2 terms.

1) Shredding a terrible NAFTA deal and creating the new trade agreement with Canada and Mexico (the globalists are shitting their pants over).

2) Pulling out of the stupid Climate Accord (globalists also shitting over).

3) Lower taxes creating new higher paying jobs and more money in everyone's pocket.

4) Exposing the corrupt media everyday.

5) Putting 1 and soon to be 2 new supreme court justices who aren't liberal activists who want to fundamentally change our constitution.

6) Working to solve the North Korean problem and soon Iranian problem.

7) China now lowering tariffs on our goods.

Eliminating the fine for the terrible health care fiasco Obama put in.


etc, etc, etc.

       NAFTA is now called usmca  wow big difference....now get rid of obamacare and call it  trumpcare..   that and screw the planet let's lay it to waste this generation will be done soon anyway... and this will make you happy..

[Humble Narcissist]

Tell me which president did more.  Screw the planet?  Ha, ha, ha, little leftist.

[chaos]

    what's your problem with California, it's the mecca of bodybuilding and the movie industry after all  

It's run by a bunch of god damned morons being voted in by a bunch of other morons that are too stupid to realize they are being fucked by the morons they elected.

[LurkerNoMore]

It's run by a bunch of god damned morons being voted in by a bunch of other morons that are too stupid to realize they are being fucked by the morons they elected.

Like the welfare red states?

[Agnostic007]

You really want California to decide who becomes president?

Odd question. It should be, do you really want citizens to have their votes weighted equally regardless of where they live?

To take it further. what I really want is for voters to pass a simple 20 question test about current affairs and government before they can vote because we all know Aunt Sally who just watches the Bachelor and votes on how cute a candidate is, or what kind of dog they own shouldn't cancel out a persons vote who studied the issues and did their homework but this is the country we live in and Jethros vote carries the same weight as Einsteins.

[Dave D]

Odd question. It should be, do you really want citizens to have their votes weighted equally regardless of where they live?

All men created equal and whatnot... you know the constitution.

[Agnostic007]

All men created equal and whatnot... you know the constitution.

Yeah. except a Democrat living in Texas' vote doesn't carry the weight of a Republican living in Texas. Or a Republican living in California doesn't carry the same weight as a Democrat living there. This doesn't seem odd to you in 2018?

[Kwon3]

Trump tore "Dr" Ford three new assholes on live TV in front of a packed crowd in Mississippi last night. This is MY President. I feel every word he says and millions of men across the world (especially in the U.S.) applauded and cheered him last night when he said what he said. Bathhouse Barry and limp handshake pretzel-choking George Dubya can't do this.

The Scott-approved.

[Kwon3]

The fact that the Europeans and Canadians don't like him proves that he's right. Only terrorists, leftist lunatics, man-hating feminist nazi impostors (real feminists hate them) and low-energy, do-nothing, layabouts don't like him or his MAGA program. The rest - the deplorables, i.e. most of the country in flyover land - back him 100%. Watch the blue wave turn into a shallow puddle, lol. Twitter users =/= the country. They're a bunch of privileged middle class babies who don't know the meaning of struggle, hard work, or patriotism. Their grandparents would spit on them.

[Kwon3]

Hillary insults half the country, again, and reminds us why she lost in a new paid interview yesterday. Her husband recently gave a $500,000 speech in Russia that the MSM didn't talk about. No worries, Hannity's watching.

[chaos]

Let's clear this up. She doesn't "just now" remember who the attacker was. Thats a false narrative that the right would have you believe. The truth is, she always knew who the attacker was.

I crashed landed in a C-141 at Iwakuni AB Japan. Plane caught on fire, slide sideways down and off the runway. Took out a fire truck with one of the engines as it slide on ice off the runway. 20 years later I couldn't tell you what year it was. I knew it was between 85-87 and happened during the winter months in Japan as it was snowing. Only later when someone else showed me the Stars and Stripes article about it did I know what year and month it happened. So in perspective. She knew she was 15. When she first told it she wasn't focused on putting every aspect of it down so she spoke generally. When it became an issue she started putting two and two together. It was before I got my license, I was 15. and then, during the hearing she said if she knew if Mark Judge was working at X store, what his employment was at the time, she could narrow it down better. Obviously because she remembered him being employed at a particular place at the time of the assault. That's just not something a person makes up.   

Really odd. I know a fella went down in Afghanistan in the mid 90's, remembers every detail, time day, year, the names of the fallen and the names of the rescuers.