Let's clear this up. She doesn't "just now" remember who the attacker was. Thats a false narrative that the right would have you believe. The truth is, she always knew who the attacker was.
I crashed landed in a C-141 at Iwakuni AB Japan. Plane caught on fire, slide sideways down and off the runway. Took out a fire truck with one of the engines as it slide on ice off the runway. 20 years later I couldn't tell you what year it was. I knew it was between 85-87 and happened during the winter months in Japan as it was snowing. Only later when someone else showed me the Stars and Stripes article about it did I know what year and month it happened. So in perspective. She knew she was 15. When she first told it she wasn't focused on putting every aspect of it down so she spoke generally. When it became an issue she started putting two and two together. It was before I got my license, I was 15. and then, during the hearing she said if she knew if Mark Judge was working at X store, what his employment was at the time, she could narrow it down better. Obviously because she remembered him being employed at a particular place at the time of the assault. That's just not something a person makes up.
Hmmm
Oh Really - I won’t write a irrelevant narrative about an incident that happened to me
To help back what I said.
When did she previously name him then. How long ago / 1mnth / 1yr 10yrs ??
And all the other points raised she can’t remember ?
Her nominated witnesses don’t corroborate what she says ?
Why has she taken him court of the incident ?
How about answering all points raised Not Just 1.
Oh and She hasn’t taken this to a legal court because it doesn’t hold water
She knows it & You Know It.
