Getbig’s Anti-Semites - A Question For You

[OlympiaGym]

You know who you are.

Do this weekend’s events in Pittsburgh give you any pause? Do you feel any guilt about the online hate and vitriol that you post here?

[dr.chimps]

Nope. Hate and stupidity Trump all. And, you have mods who abet the hate.

[Powerlift66]

Only thing I hate is modern media, pushes hate and lies,and is anti-american.
Should be trying to bring everyone together, not destroy the country.

[The Scott]

Nope. Hate and stupidity Trump all. And, you have mods who abet the hate.

You really are a self-loathing simian. 

I would say that the majority of people here (and you are not among them) despise liberalism and cuckoldism.  There are a great many Jewish people that are Conservative but it seems that is primarily in Israel.  The excellent singer/actor Ed Ames is Jewish and Conservative.  Liberal Jews are of the Hollywood Hebrew variety, i.e., as fake as Wiggs.  They are what we refer to as disgusting "nation-cucks" and by that it is meant they desire to watch their country (kuntry) get screwed by all manner of societal dregs.

So try to rationalize your idiocy with your Animal Farm squeals of "racism!" and "antisemitism", "homophobia", "schmoemophobia"  and whatever else your churlish, childish pea-brains can make up to verify how much you "care".

So then, Puke Skywanker, whip out your flaccid Whitesaber and battle away against your imagined injustices in the name of the flavor of the moment oppressed group.  Fuck your noise, Lancelot Link. 

[dr.chimps]

You really are a self-loathing simian. 

I would say that the majority of people here (and you are not among them) despise liberalism and cuckoldism.  There are a great many Jewish people that are Conservative but it seems that is primarily in Israel.  The excellent singer/actor Ed Ames is Jewish and Conservative.  Liberal Jews are of the Hollywood Hebrew variety, i.e., as fake as Wiggs.  They are what we refer to as disgusting "nation-cucks" and by that it is meant they desire to watch their country (kuntry) get screwed by all manner of societal dregs.

So try to rationalize your idiocy with your Animal Farm squeals of "racism!" and "antisemitism", "homophobia", "schmoemophobia"  and whatever else your churlish, childish pea-brains can make up to verify how much you "care".

So then, Puke Skywanker, whip out your flaccid Whitesaber and battle away against your imagined injustices in the name of the flavor of the moment oppressed group.  Fuck your noise, Lancelot Link. 

Haters self-identify.

/you talk too much

[The Scott]

Haters self-identify.

/you talk too much

It aches does it not, to be so easily bested by someone such as I? John would make you weep. 

[sarcafago]

My post was shoah'd within two minutes. 

[Ron]

The issue is free speech vs. hatred and incite to violence speech.  Does a mod, impose his beliefs, and limit someones free speech? That is the question for all.

The answer depends on each person.

There are some that if they disagree immediately with what you are thinking, they delete you and band you.  Just because.

In our world, you have a multitude of views, ideas and liberal vs. conservatives vs. extremes vs. communism.





So how do I try to handle it.   Being a Jew, more conservative than others, and Republicans, I am in the minority of many.  But I also know that debating, discussing and talking about issues, you will always have heated discussions.  Free speech is one thing, but speech to incite violence needs to go.  If you debate in a reasonable thought process, that is fine, hence free speech, but if you decide to put up a pictures of someone trying to kill someone else (whatever race or religion), or saying 'All Jews or Muslims or Christians Must Die', that is blatant violence speech, and not tolerated.

Resorting to violence, and killing innocents people is just crap.   You are a fucking big hero because you shot and killed people who are there just because they are of a race, a gender, a color.  Pathetic.  You may not like migrants, or illegal immigrants or Jews or Muslims or whatever, but inciting to violence is screwed up, and no, we do not tolerate that.

Yes, I allow debates of all form, that is the true nature of a Democratic site, but I always find it sad that some people think that 'All Jews' or 'All Muslims' or 'All Anything' are the root of their miserable misery. Easy to blame it on someone else when you have to see that usually, it is you that is the problem.

Big ass pathetic creature of mental fuck up shooting and killing a 97 year old.  Wow.   And yes, I am truly for the death penalty, no mercy for this type of person.

My post was shoah'd within two minutes. 

And you had a point of free speech debates - whether what hate speech leads to violence or just more debates. Just not the right time for those type of pictures at this moment, with 11 killed, and mourning still around.

[The Scott]

Israel is our friend and ally.   


Hollyweird is NOT.  I think most here despise the Hollyweird Hebrew phonies with the Wiggsian Nebrew coming in a close 2nd on the bullshittometer of fake faiths.  Israelis are for the far greater part, very conservative and love the United States with all their heart and soul. 


Hollyweirdos hate this great Nation of ours.

[Humble Narcissist]

The issue is free speech vs. hatred and incite to violence speech.  Does a mod, impose his beliefs, and limit someones free speech? That is the question for all.

The answer depends on each person.

There are some that if they disagree immediately with what you are thinking, they delete you and band you.  Just because.

In our world, you have a multitude of views, ideas and liberal vs. conservatives vs. extremes vs. communism.





So how do I try to handle it.   Being a Jew, more conservative than others, and Republicans, I am in the minority of many.  But I also know that debating, discussing and talking about issues, you will always have heated discussions.  Free speech is one thing, but speech to incite violence needs to go.  If you debate in a reasonable thought process, that is fine, hence free speech, but if you decide to put up a pictures of someone trying to kill someone else (whatever race or religion), or saying 'All Jews or Muslims or Christians Must Die', that is blatant violence speech, and not tolerated.

Resorting to violence, and killing innocents people is just crap.   You are a fucking big hero because you shot and killed people who are there just because they are of a race, a gender, a color.  Pathetic.  You may not like migrants, or illegal immigrants or Jews or Muslims or whatever, but inciting to violence is screwed up, and no, we do not tolerate that.

Yes, I allow debates of all form, that is the true nature of a Democratic site, but I always find it sad that some people think that 'All Jews' or 'All Muslims' or 'All Anything' are the root of their miserable misery. Easy to blame it on someone else when you have to see that usually, it is you that is the problem.

Big ass pathetic creature of mental fuck up shooting and killing a 97 year old.  Wow.   And yes, I am truly for the death penalty, no mercy for this type of person.





And you had a point of free speech debates - whether what hate speech leads to violence or just more debates. Just not the right time for those type of pictures at this moment, with 11 killed, and mourning still around.

Ron, a site like yours probably prevents violence because conservatives and liberals can vent at each other and get it out of their system and then go about their day without having pent up rage.  Thanks.

[SuperTed]

You know who you are.

Do this weekend’s events in Pittsburgh give you any pause? Do you feel any guilt about the online hate and vitriol that you post here?

Your posting history suggests that you once held such views. What made you change?

Even though I do hold some fascist views, I've always avoided making any vitriolic posts against a specific group.
Shooting up some elderly Jewish folk in a place of worship is not only morally indefensible, but also strategically counter-productive.

[SOMEPARTS]

Never understood why a conservative religion would endorse liberalism.

[Humble Narcissist]

Never understood why a conservative religion would endorse liberalism.

Maybe Ron or another Jewish getbigger could explain this?  Is it about power in the party or something else?

[Kwon3]

Never understood why a conservative religion would endorse liberalism.

Because most Jews are drawn to social causes that promote the welfare of other peoples/races, regardless of whether they're a minority in the country in question or whether it's what the elected representatives or the people want. They did it during the Civil Rights era when they offered their legal and media services to the MLK movement, and they've been at it ever since with a variety of causes, for instance by taking a soft stance against illegal immigrants in the press or the muted response to Trump moving their embassy to Jerusalem, among many other things. They're also generally pretty expert at seeing opportunities to make money or build critical social relationships in the furtherance of a business, a cause, a movement etc. in  way non-Jews fail to understand or execute. Put a challenge to an Israeli museum curator to move to the U.S. and within 3 months he'll be there legally, probably managing another museum there. Do it to an Indian or a Pole, and they'll be no closer to that objective after 3 months than on day 1.

The main thing that unites them is themselves. If a German school gets shot up, people there will hold candles and women will cry for 2 days later it's over. No one else outside the world cares or notices besides CNN because it fits their anti-gun agenda. But if a synagogue is shot up, the entire world Jewish movement takes notice and even Ron, who never posts here other than contest placings, makes a huge post about it as seen above. That should tell you something. It's like a spidey sense goes off when another Jew's flower bed is trampled on somewhere in the world, it sends a message out and they all know about it. I know OMR will chime in soon.

That said, I don't identify as anti-Semitic because it focuses too narrowly on one group in particular, when we have a global problem with liberalism and a toxic one-world platform pushed by billionaires and select world leaders (mostly western), not all of whom are Jews or working for them directly. During the Nazi period, this wasn't understood, and mass media and the Internet didn't exist for people to do their due diligence and their own research, so they saw rich Jews everywhere and assumed they were the ones ruining their country. That wasn't true of all cases, and in any event those Jews were just a small part of a bigger conspiracy that didn't necessarily serve their interests (otherwise why did they allow concentration camps and such). It was a simpler era and they looked for simple solutions to complex questions that couldn't be resolved just by persecution or mass killings.

My post was shoah'd within two minutes.  

Not shocked.

Ron, a site like yours probably prevents violence because conservatives and liberals can vent at each other and get it out of their system and then go about their day without having pent up rage.  Thanks.

Yes and no. They tolerate gimmicks like dearth, stan diego, che, danimal77 who come here just to incite drama or harass users without contributing to the political discussions in the other subforum designed for it. I have to agree with Dr. Chimps...the moderators and especially Ron are complicit in that.

There are some that if they disagree immediately with what you are thinking, they delete you and band you.  Just because.

That's wrong and you need to stop doing it. You banned me for calling a few guys here with questionable posting histories suspected pedophiles (and I was mostly being half-assed about it), but you allow a lot of gimmicky, fake accounts to spoil the forum for everyone else. That's not right and you need to own up to it. I don't think many mods here can ban, so you should be transparent and admit you do most of them, justified or not.

Resorting to violence, and killing innocents people is just crap.   You are a fucking big hero because you shot and killed people who are there just because they are of a race, a gender, a color.  Pathetic.  You may not like migrants, or illegal immigrants or Jews or Muslims or whatever, but inciting to violence is screwed up, and no, we do not tolerate that.

America's a violent country founded on murder, racism, and the expropriation of land that didn't legally belong to them and the removal of subject peoples living there in brutal displacements. I agree that you don't want to give that a platform online but nonetheless this is one of the most violent countries in the world, which is different than being the country with the highest killings (plenty of African and South American countries can take credit for that distinction). This is assuming violence can be political and verbal, not just physical.

[Kwon3]

Maybe Ron or another Jewish getbigger could explain this?  Is it about power in the party or something else?

It's mostly about their feeling that the world needs to be a fairer, kinder place to the downtrodden (since they identify with them due to their own history of being subjected to prejudice or worse) but in reality it amounts to stirring up trouble in various places they happen to live in and that is the root cause of anti-semitism, along with jealousy by non-Jews at Jewish industriousness and financial success (though this is exaggerated, as not all jews are rich or businessmen or media people), and the acknowledged tendency of these people to be very proud and even arrogant when they feel they're under criticism or Israel is (though again, Soros is anti-Israel and there's rabbis that belong to an obscure sect which demands the Israeli gov't hand over power to Palestinians and let them rule over Jews until their god comes to create the final Jewish homeland). That's why I don't overly generalize but these are my views based on a while of observing them. Take for instance on Fox they just reported 11 Jewish leaders (mostly rabbis) have sent word that the President isn't welcome in their communities unless he holds a national speech denouncing "white" supremacy. What does that have to do with this incident? Why make it about one racial group when we're a melting pot that rejects such identity politics and labels? Who are they to tell the POTUS what to do? That kind of overweening arrogance is why our sympathy for them is blunted. They piss us off with that bullshit.

[Mothballs]

You really are a self-loathing simian.  

I would say that the majority of people here (and you are not among them) despise liberalism and cuckoldism.  There are a great many Jewish people that are Conservative but it seems that is primarily in Israel.  The excellent singer/actor Ed Ames is Jewish and Conservative.  Liberal Jews are of the Hollywood Hebrew variety, i.e., as fake as Wiggs.  They are what we refer to as disgusting "nation-cucks" and by that it is meant they desire to watch their country (kuntry) get screwed by all manner of societal dregs.

So try to rationalize your idiocy with your Animal Farm squeals of "racism!" and "antisemitism", "homophobia", "schmoemophobia"   and whatever else your churlish, childish pea-brains can make up to verify how much you "care".

So then, Puke Skywanker, whip out your flaccid Whitesaber and battle away against your imagined injustices in the name of the flavor of the moment oppressed group.  Fuck your noise, Lancelot Link.  

Most Jews I know are conservative. But just like regular conservatives, their voices are drowned out by the more vocal liberal Jews who are on TV and in other positions of power. I also see that they (conservative Jews) frequently hide their opinions so as not to be scolded by their fellow Jews. So basically, the same as most conservative Christians.

[El Diablo Blanco]

I don’t care for them but I don’t wish death on them either.  No one has the right to take someone else’s life.  Killing people during worship is a chicken shit move.

[robcguns]

Don’t have a problem with the Jews and never have.that being said what happened to those people was horrible.There are a bunch of places where what that guy did would be useful but killing a bunch older people is just stupid.

[illuminati]

Quote from: SOMEPARTS on Today at 18:39:47
Never understood why a conservative religion would endorse liberalism.

Because most Jews are drawn to social causes that promote the welfare of other peoples/races, regardless of whether they're a minority in the country in question or whether it's what the elected representatives or the people want. They did it during the Civil Rights era when they offered their legal and media services to the MLK movement, and they've been at it ever since with a variety of causes, for instance by taking a soft stance against illegal immigrants in the press or the muted response to Trump moving their embassy to Jerusalem, among many other things. They're also generally pretty expert at seeing opportunities to make money or build critical social relationships in the furtherance of a business, a cause, a movement etc. in  way non-Jews fail to understand or execute. Put a challenge to an Israeli museum curator to move to the U.S. and within 3 months he'll be there legally, probably managing another museum there. Do it to an Indian or a Pole, and they'll be no closer to that objective after 3 months than on day 1.

The main thing that unites them is themselves. If a German school gets shot up, people there will hold candles and women will cry for 2 days later it's over. No one else outside the world cares or notices besides CNN because it fits their anti-gun agenda. But if a synagogue is shot up, the entire world Jewish movement takes notice and even Ron, who never posts here other than contest placings, makes a huge post about it as seen above. That should tell you something. It's like a spidey sense goes off when another Jew's flower bed is trampled on somewhere in the world, it sends a message out and they all know about it. I know OMR will chime in soon.

That said, I don't identify as anti-Semitic because it focuses too narrowly on one group in particular, when we have a global problem with liberalism and a toxic one-world platform pushed by billionaires and select world leaders (mostly western), not all of whom are Jews or working for them directly. During the Nazi period, this wasn't understood, and mass media and the Internet didn't exist for people to do their due diligence and their own research, so they saw rich Jews everywhere and assumed they were the ones ruining their country. That wasn't true of all cases, and in any event those Jews were just a small part of a bigger conspiracy that didn't necessarily serve their interests (otherwise why did they allow concentration camps and such). It was a simpler era and they looked for simple solutions to complex questions that couldn't be resolved just by persecution or mass killings.

Quote from: sarcafago on Today at 17:01:57
My post was shoah'd within two minutes.  Grin

Not shocked.

Quote from: Humble Narcissist on Today at 18:11:56
Ron, a site like yours probably prevents violence because conservatives and liberals can vent at each other and get it out of their system and then go about their day without having pent up rage.  Thanks. Smiley

Yes and no. They tolerate gimmicks like dearth, stan diego, che, danimal77 who come here just to incite drama or harass users without contributing to the political discussions in the other subforum designed for it. I have to agree with Dr. Chimps...the moderators and especially Ron are complicit in that.

Quote from: Ron on Today at 17:04:44
There are some that if they disagree immediately with what you are thinking, they delete you and band you.  Just because.

That's wrong and you need to stop doing it. You banned me for calling a few guys here with questionable posting histories suspected pedophiles (and I was mostly being half-assed about it), but you allow a lot of gimmicky, fake accounts to spoil the forum for everyone else. That's not right and you need to own up to it. I don't think many mods here can ban, so you should be transparent and admit you do most of them, justified or not.

Quote from: Ron on Today at 17:04:44
Resorting to violence, and killing innocents people is just crap.   You are a fucking big hero because you shot and killed people who are there just because they are of a race, a gender, a color.  Pathetic.  You may not like migrants, or illegal immigrants or Jews or Muslims or whatever, but inciting to violence is screwed up, and no, we do not tolerate that.

America's a violent country founded on murder, racism, and the expropriation of land that didn't legally belong to them and the removal of subject peoples living there in brutal displacements. I agree that you don't want to give that a platform online but nonetheless this is one of the most violent countries in the world, which is different than being the country with the highest killings (plenty of African and South American countries can take credit for that distinction). This is assuming violence can be political and verbal, not just physical.

Excellent post
Some very good points
Look forward to them being answered

[Kwon3]

Most Jews I know are conservative. But just like regular conservatives, their voices are drowned out by the more vocal liberal Jews who are on TV and in other positions of power. I also see that they (conservative Jews) frequently hide their opinions so as not to be scolded by their fellow Jews. So basically, the same as most conservative Christians.

No, most Jews are not conservative. 74% of them vote from the Democrat party, and the majority live in the three most liberal cities in the U.S.

[Primemuscle]

No, most Jews are not conservative. 74% of them vote from the Democrat party, and the majority live in the three most liberal cities in the U.S.

Statistics vary on this but here are a couple of interesting ones.

Three most liberal cities:
1. Washington 90.91%
2. Baltimore 87.19%
3. Philadelphia 85.29%

This is surprising. -Would not have been my guess. With 75.37% Portland isn't on the 10 most liberal cities list. The U.S. cities with the highest Jewish populations are, New York, Los Angeles and Chicago.

https://www.homesnacks.net/most-liberal-cities-in-america-1210850/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_urban_areas_by_Jewish_population

[Ted SuperSet]

Because most Jews are drawn to social causes that promote the welfare of other peoples/races, regardless of whether they're a minority in the country in question or whether it's what the elected representatives or the people want. They did it during the Civil Rights era when they offered their legal and media services to the MLK movement, and they've been at it ever since with a variety of causes, for instance by taking a soft stance against illegal immigrants in the press or the muted response to Trump moving their embassy to Jerusalem, among many other things. They're also generally pretty expert at seeing opportunities to make money or build critical social relationships in the furtherance of a business, a cause, a movement etc. in  way non-Jews fail to understand or execute. Put a challenge to an Israeli museum curator to move to the U.S. and within 3 months he'll be there legally, probably managing another museum there. Do it to an Indian or a Pole, and they'll be no closer to that objective after 3 months than on day 1.

The main thing that unites them is themselves. If a German school gets shot up, people there will hold candles and women will cry for 2 days later it's over. No one else outside the world cares or notices besides CNN because it fits their anti-gun agenda. But if a synagogue is shot up, the entire world Jewish movement takes notice and even Ron, who never posts here other than contest placings, makes a huge post about it as seen above. That should tell you something. It's like a spidey sense goes off when another Jew's flower bed is trampled on somewhere in the world, it sends a message out and they all know about it. I know OMR will chime in soon.

That said, I don't identify as anti-Semitic because it focuses too narrowly on one group in particular, when we have a global problem with liberalism and a toxic one-world platform pushed by billionaires and select world leaders (mostly western), not all of whom are Jews or working for them directly. During the Nazi period, this wasn't understood, and mass media and the Internet didn't exist for people to do their due diligence and their own research, so they saw rich Jews everywhere and assumed they were the ones ruining their country. That wasn't true of all cases, and in any event those Jews were just a small part of a bigger conspiracy that didn't necessarily serve their interests (otherwise why did they allow concentration camps and such). It was a simpler era and they looked for simple solutions to complex questions that couldn't be resolved just by persecution or mass killings.

Not shocked.

Yes and no. They tolerate gimmicks like dearth, stan diego, che, danimal77 who come here just to incite drama or harass users without contributing to the political discussions in the other subforum designed for it. I have to agree with Dr. Chimps...the moderators and especially Ron are complicit in that.

That's wrong and you need to stop doing it. You banned me for calling a few guys here with questionable posting histories suspected pedophiles (and I was mostly being half-assed about it), but you allow a lot of gimmicky, fake accounts to spoil the forum for everyone else. That's not right and you need to own up to it. I don't think many mods here can ban, so you should be transparent and admit you do most of them, justified or not.

America's a violent country founded on murder, racism, and the expropriation of land that didn't legally belong to them and the removal of subject peoples living there in brutal displacements. I agree that you don't want to give that a platform online but nonetheless this is one of the most violent countries in the world, which is different than being the country with the highest killings (plenty of African and South American countries can take credit for that distinction). This is assuming violence can be political and verbal, not just physical.

Time...you have lots of it

[TonyAlva]

 

[Kwon3]

Time...you have lots of it

You use several accounts on this site. You can't accuse anyone of having too much time.

Quote one post you've made on this site that wasn't about flatulence or harassing other members just for posting here. You contribute nothing. You give nothing. You ARE nothing.

He converted just for the jokes.

[MAXX]

Rubbish... No reason to feel guilty about words written on a website. Not a good society to live if we can't give our opinions on matters.