If u get 'snipped' do u still 'nut'

[Marty Champions]

Or do u shoot blanks

[Irongrip400]

Still comes out bro, just no sperm. Not painful or anything, I didn’t do the whole thing where you sit around with frozen peas in your lap all weekend.

[2ND COMING]

Still comes out bro, just no sperm. Not painful or anything, I didn’t do the whole thing where you sit around with frozen peas in your lap all weekend.

Why would you do such a thing to your body

Some type of cancer in the vas deferens region 

[Marty Champions]

Still comes out bro, just no sperm. Not painful or anything, I didn’t do the whole thing where you sit around with frozen peas in your lap all weekend.

i wonder what negative effectfrom this. Where does the dam sperm go?

[IroNat]

Takes a couple months to make sure all your swimmers are gone, doesn't it?

[BIG DUB]

google vasectomy immune system response 

[Irongrip400]

i wonder what negative effectfrom this. Where does the dam sperm go?

Into your scrotum and reabsorbed by the body. Maximum protein synthesis.

[Humble Narcissist]

Nut in her mouth or anus and she won't get pregnant.  No need for surgery.

[Mr Anabolic]

It could help cause prostate cancer.

[Zillotch]

[Irongrip400]

From the screen grab the guy is a soy boy. I’ll keep shooting blanks and not worry about pulling out and getting my wife pregnant. Not trying to do middle of the night feedings or change diapers anymore. Rubbers are out of the question.

[Humble Narcissist]

Make your wife get on the pill or better yet a shot they only need once or twice a year.

[Zillotch]

From the screen grab the guy is a soy boy. I’ll keep shooting blanks

for those who have already had themselves hacked – it would be advantageous to skip the video.

those who have not yet mutilated themselves - should watch the video.

[funk51]

 

[tres_taco_combo]

with all procedures there will be pros and cons.

[IRON CROSS]

Or do u shoot blanks

Don't do it Mr.AC/DC , spread your DNA around 

[Matt]

My sperm count as of March 2017 was 1.162 billion.  I would not give up my balls or my fertility for anything.  A woman I was hoping to have my next baby with asked me if I would get the snip after six children...but I don't know...the aunt of my eldest two children had an ex-boyfriend who died in a car crash in 2005 with two of her siblings.  Horribly tragic.  If that happened to my current three children, I would probably want to have more children, even if I was 55 years old.

So...I wouldn't give up my ability to reproduce very easily.  I live for my children, and I wouldn't value my own life as much without them.

That, and I shoot piping hot loads of sperm, akin to the money shot of Peter North.  After reviewing tape of Peter, he cums for an average of 8.5 seconds, while I cum for 10.5 seconds on average.  Peter shoots thicker ropes, but I still think I have him beat.  The only way to determine that would be to find a time machine and travel back to 1987 in order to enter a Sperm-Off with him at a booth at a porn expo - with the best 2 out of 3 being declared champion.  Or best 3 out of 5.  I would still put my money on myself, but it would be a stiff competition.

I love shooting ropes of sperm all over a woman's stomach.  I make it a point to aim each rope at a fresh patch of skin so that the woman I'm with feels every hot rope.  I like when women think it's because of them that I shoot so much piping hot sperm, but I think it's mostly genetic - I was cumming like this since puberty, and had 1,500 wet dreams between the 2-year period starting just before turning 13, and ending just before turning 15 [the wet dreams just stopped one night for me in September of 1996, although I had some wet dreams into my twenties].

Also, due to The Matriarchy, and due to unrealistic media images of males in media, I thought for years that Peter North shot more total rope volume than I did - until one day in 1999, I watched a VHS containing the XXX movie "Lust in the Fastlane" [with Tracy Lords, I think filmed when she was underage], and realized that Peter North's massive 30-second facial of two women in that movie was manipulated to look much larger than it was!

Wow...what a steaming crock of...you know.  It's like Vince McMahon interviewing Andre the Giant while Andre was standing on a milk crate to make him look even bigger than he was.  Or the video on the WWE website of Big John Studd bench pressing "700-lb".  WHY must people who already look unattainable get edited to look even more other-worldly than they already are?  It fills people's minds with notions that some people's achievements are even more unattainable than they already are - when they already are quite unattainable.  

[Marty Champions]

Happy squirt day matt c , I am ABsolutly  THRILLED to see you bro!!!!

[SOMEPARTS]

My sperm count as of March 2017 was 1.162 billion.  I would not give up my balls or my fertility for anything.  A woman I was hoping to have my next baby with asked me if I would get the snip after six children...but I don't know...the aunt of my eldest two children had an ex-boyfriend who died in a car crash in 2005 with two of her siblings.  Horribly tragic.  If that happened to my current three children, I would probably want to have more children, even if I was 55 years old.

So...I wouldn't give up my ability to reproduce very easily.  I live for my children, and I wouldn't value my own life as much without them.

That, and I shoot piping hot loads of sperm, akin to the money shot of Peter North.  After reviewing tape of Peter, he cums for an average of 8.5 seconds, while I cum for 10.5 seconds on average.  Peter shoots thicker ropes, but I still think I have him beat.  The only way to determine that would be to find a time machine and travel back to 1987 in order to enter a Sperm-Off with him at a booth at a porn expo - with the best 2 out of 3 being declared champion.  Or best 3 out of 5.  I would still put my money on myself, but it would be a stiff competition.

I love shooting ropes of sperm all over a woman's stomach.  I make it a point to aim each rope at a fresh patch of skin so that the woman I'm with feels every hot rope.  I like when women think it's because of them that I shoot so much piping hot sperm, but I think it's mostly genetic - I was cumming like this since puberty, and had 1,500 wet dreams between the 2-year period starting just before turning 13, and ending just before turning 15 [the wet dreams just stopped one night for me in September of 1996, although I had some wet dreams into my twenties].

Also, due to The Matriarchy, and due to unrealistic media images of males in media, I thought for years that Peter North shot more total rope volume than I did - until one day in 1999, I watched a VHS containing the XXX movie "Lust in the Fastlane" [with Tracy Lords, I think filmed when she was underage], and realized that Peter North's massive 30-second facial of two women in that movie was manipulated to look much larger than it was!

Wow...what a steaming crock of...you know.  It's like Vince McMahon interviewing Andre the Giant while Andre was standing on a milk crate to make him look even bigger than he was.  Or the video on the WWE website of Big John Studd bench pressing "700-lb".  WHY must people who already look unattainable get edited to look even more other-worldly than they already are?  It fills people's minds with notions that some people's achievements are even more unattainable than they already are - when they already are quite unattainable.  

This is Lord Byron-level Getbig poetry, quoted for posterity. BAY LIKEY.

[Rusty Trombone]

Do you still nut and get a boner when your balls shrink?

[Taffin]

My sperm count as of March 2017 was 1.162 billion.  I

Yes, I remember you posting the results here on GetBig!  

[...] I shoot piping hot loads of sperm, akin to the money shot of Peter North.  After reviewing tape of Peter, he cums for an average of 8.5 seconds, while I cum for 10.5 seconds on average.  Peter shoots thicker ropes, but I still think I have him beat.  The only way to determine that would be to find a time machine and travel back to 1987 in order to enter a Sperm-Off with him at a booth at a porn expo - with the best 2 out of 3 being declared champion.  Or best 3 out of 5.  I would still put my money on myself, but it would be a stiff competition.

I love shooting ropes of sperm all over a woman's stomach.  I make it a point to aim each rope at a fresh patch of skin so that the woman I'm with feels every hot rope.  I like when women think it's because of them that I shoot so much piping hot sperm, but I think it's mostly genetic - I was cumming like this since puberty, and had 1,500 wet dreams between the 2-year period starting just before turning 13, and ending just before turning 15 [the wet dreams just stopped one night for me in September of 1996, although I had some wet dreams into my twenties].

Farking hell Matt!  Too much information LOL  Although your sentence, "After reviewing tape of Peter, he cums for an average of 8.5 seconds" presumably means you were using a stopwatch and watched numerous clips to 'gather the data... which is hilarious  

Merry Xmas dude

[Bevo]

My sperm count as of March 2017 was 1.162 billion.  I would not give up my balls or my fertility for anything.  A woman I was hoping to have my next baby with asked me if I would get the snip after six children...but I don't know...the aunt of my eldest two children had an ex-boyfriend who died in a car crash in 2005 with two of her siblings.  Horribly tragic.  If that happened to my current three children, I would probably want to have more children, even if I was 55 years old.

So...I wouldn't give up my ability to reproduce very easily.  I live for my children, and I wouldn't value my own life as much without them.

That, and I shoot piping hot loads of sperm, akin to the money shot of Peter North.  After reviewing tape of Peter, he cums for an average of 8.5 seconds, while I cum for 10.5 seconds on average.  Peter shoots thicker ropes, but I still think I have him beat.  The only way to determine that would be to find a time machine and travel back to 1987 in order to enter a Sperm-Off with him at a booth at a porn expo - with the best 2 out of 3 being declared champion.  Or best 3 out of 5.  I would still put my money on myself, but it would be a stiff competition.

I love shooting ropes of sperm all over a woman's stomach.  I make it a point to aim each rope at a fresh patch of skin so that the woman I'm with feels every hot rope.  I like when women think it's because of them that I shoot so much piping hot sperm, but I think it's mostly genetic - I was cumming like this since puberty, and had 1,500 wet dreams between the 2-year period starting just before turning 13, and ending just before turning 15 [the wet dreams just stopped one night for me in September of 1996, although I had some wet dreams into my twenties].

Also, due to The Matriarchy, and due to unrealistic media images of males in media, I thought for years that Peter North shot more total rope volume than I did - until one day in 1999, I watched a VHS containing the XXX movie "Lust in the Fastlane" [with Tracy Lords, I think filmed when she was underage], and realized that Peter North's massive 30-second facial of two women in that movie was manipulated to look much larger than it was!

Wow...what a steaming crock of...you know.  It's like Vince McMahon interviewing Andre the Giant while Andre was standing on a milk crate to make him look even bigger than he was.  Or the video on the WWE website of Big John Studd bench pressing "700-lb".  WHY must people who already look unattainable get edited to look even more other-worldly than they already are?  It fills people's minds with notions that some people's achievements are even more unattainable than they already are - when they already are quite unattainable.  

You just need to stop having kids

Quit being a Hebrew

[Humble Narcissist]

My sperm count as of March 2017 was 1.162 billion.  I would not give up my balls or my fertility for anything.  A woman I was hoping to have my next baby with asked me if I would get the snip after six children...but I don't know...the aunt of my eldest two children had an ex-boyfriend who died in a car crash in 2005 with two of her siblings.  Horribly tragic.  If that happened to my current three children, I would probably want to have more children, even if I was 55 years old.

So...I wouldn't give up my ability to reproduce very easily.  I live for my children, and I wouldn't value my own life as much without them.

That, and I shoot piping hot loads of sperm, akin to the money shot of Peter North.  After reviewing tape of Peter, he cums for an average of 8.5 seconds, while I cum for 10.5 seconds on average.  Peter shoots thicker ropes, but I still think I have him beat.  The only way to determine that would be to find a time machine and travel back to 1987 in order to enter a Sperm-Off with him at a booth at a porn expo - with the best 2 out of 3 being declared champion.  Or best 3 out of 5.  I would still put my money on myself, but it would be a stiff competition.

I love shooting ropes of sperm all over a woman's stomach.  I make it a point to aim each rope at a fresh patch of skin so that the woman I'm with feels every hot rope.  I like when women think it's because of them that I shoot so much piping hot sperm, but I think it's mostly genetic - I was cumming like this since puberty, and had 1,500 wet dreams between the 2-year period starting just before turning 13, and ending just before turning 15 [the wet dreams just stopped one night for me in September of 1996, although I had some wet dreams into my twenties].

Also, due to The Matriarchy, and due to unrealistic media images of males in media, I thought for years that Peter North shot more total rope volume than I did - until one day in 1999, I watched a VHS containing the XXX movie "Lust in the Fastlane" [with Tracy Lords, I think filmed when she was underage], and realized that Peter North's massive 30-second facial of two women in that movie was manipulated to look much larger than it was!

Wow...what a steaming crock of...you know.  It's like Vince McMahon interviewing Andre the Giant while Andre was standing on a milk crate to make him look even bigger than he was.  Or the video on the WWE website of Big John Studd bench pressing "700-lb".  WHY must people who already look unattainable get edited to look even more other-worldly than they already are?  It fills people's minds with notions that some people's achievements are even more unattainable than they already are - when they already are quite unattainable.  

I know way more about your ejaculation than I ever wanted to know.

[IroNat]

Get a vascectomy to protect your $$millions from golddigging women bent on obtaining endless child support.

[oldtimer1]

My sperm count as of March 2017 was 1.162 billion.  I would not give up my balls or my fertility for anything.  A woman I was hoping to have my next baby with asked me if I would get the snip after six children...but I don't know...the aunt of my eldest two children had an ex-boyfriend who died in a car crash in 2005 with two of her siblings.  Horribly tragic.  If that happened to my current three children, I would probably want to have more children, even if I was 55 years old.

So...I wouldn't give up my ability to reproduce very easily.  I live for my children, and I wouldn't value my own life as much without them.

That, and I shoot piping hot loads of sperm, akin to the money shot of Peter North.  After reviewing tape of Peter, he cums for an average of 8.5 seconds, while I cum for 10.5 seconds on average.  Peter shoots thicker ropes, but I still think I have him beat.  The only way to determine that would be to find a time machine and travel back to 1987 in order to enter a Sperm-Off with him at a booth at a porn expo - with the best 2 out of 3 being declared champion.  Or best 3 out of 5.  I would still put my money on myself, but it would be a stiff competition.

I love shooting ropes of sperm all over a woman's stomach.  I make it a point to aim each rope at a fresh patch of skin so that the woman I'm with feels every hot rope.  I like when women think it's because of them that I shoot so much piping hot sperm, but I think it's mostly genetic - I was cumming like this since puberty, and had 1,500 wet dreams between the 2-year period starting just before turning 13, and ending just before turning 15 [the wet dreams just stopped one night for me in September of 1996, although I had some wet dreams into my twenties].

Also, due to The Matriarchy, and due to unrealistic media images of males in media, I thought for years that Peter North shot more total rope volume than I did - until one day in 1999, I watched a VHS containing the XXX movie "Lust in the Fastlane" [with Tracy Lords, I think filmed when she was underage], and realized that Peter North's massive 30-second facial of two women in that movie was manipulated to look much larger than it was!

Wow...what a steaming crock of...you know.  It's like Vince McMahon interviewing Andre the Giant while Andre was standing on a milk crate to make him look even bigger than he was.  Or the video on the WWE website of Big John Studd bench pressing "700-lb".  WHY must people who already look unattainable get edited to look even more other-worldly than they already are?  It fills people's minds with notions that some people's achievements are even more unattainable than they already are - when they already are quite unattainable.  

Should be archived as a classic get big post.