If the truth turns you into an athiest, that their business.
Wiggs,
I read your response to me the other day, but I can't remember what thread it was in. I'm really happy for you that you've found God, have made progress with your career endeavors, and seem to be happier. It made me wonder a few more things though.
Why don't you question a lot of what seems to be hate towards others, or the "they will all pay" type stuff that you post that your new found religion seems to preach? If you believe in God, and Adam and Eve then you have to believe in love, morality, and doing the right thing when presented with choices.....especially when warned/knowing better. How do you rationalize hate and wishing/believing in future servitude (slavery in your words) to others that have never hurt you with that all in mind? Especially just based on race? Kinda flies in the face of the whole "do unto others" thing, no? Also, this is clearly reverse racism which as a black man who opposes racism to you and your black brothers, I would think that you'd oppose racism of any kind? I'll give you blacks are still upset by shit that happened a many years ago, and not it our generation even though I think it's fucked up. However, you mentioned Asians becoming slaves and paying.....I don't get it?
If you went back to old Wiggs and smoked a blunt, and then read your current words would old Wiggs be appalled at this new line of thinking, and wonder what the hell was wrong with new Wiggs? Maybe I asked you that in a different way in the other thread, but I'm asking again even if I did since I don't remember your response.
Also, as someone else asked in the other thread, taking the religious stuff out, what the fuck do you get out of the flat earth theory? Don't give me the bullshit answer of spreading the truth as it's written. That's an escape answer. I'm no math genius so some of this guy's shit is over my head, but it seems he went to great lengths to conduct an unbiased experiment while kind of hoping he might be wrong and the Earth actually was flat. https://creation.com/a-direct-test-of-the-flat-earth-model-flight-times
Here's another fun tool for you. http://www.gcmap.com/mapui?P=JFK-HKG&MS=wls&DU=mi (Tip I learned, don't use the search box up top it doesn't work. Go to the bottom left under "Map Controls Path" and manually type in any major airports you choose so you can see the flight path)
I'm very inquisitive, and I'm open to debate new ideas or even be proven wrong.....certainly have been wrong before.
Here's what I looked up while keeping an open mind, risking being put on the "no fly" list by searching flight paths
, and being of the thought that numbers don't lie. A flight from LAX to JFK is 2,745 miles (obviously flying east). A flight from JFK to HKG (again flying east) is 8,072 miles. Total distance 10,547 (again, I stress going east). Meanwhile, a flight from LAX to HKG is only 7,260 miles (flying west) from Cali. That's a discrepancy of 3,287 miles. How do you explain that discrepancy? While LAX to JFK is likely not a perfectly parallel lined path, there most certainly can't be a 3200+ mile variance.
Also, if the earth is flat and HKG is at the right side of the map and LAX in the USA on the left as I've seen laid out: you can not possibly travel east to west or west to east between the two AND have a shorter distance overall than going east from LAX across the country to HKG. Unless.....you can fly upside down under a flat earth, and then flip back over to land. I have heard of no passenger experiences of this happening, and I'm quite sure that such experiences would be well documented as they would be the most turbulent flights ever, and/or the passengers would experience weightlessness. Please explain.
