Ahhhh.....there you are! I was looking for a post of yours to reply to publicly!
Unlike some on here regarding the report, I'm not going to try to spin things or save face. I'll take my medicine like a man.
I stated that Hillary would be the preferred candidate for Russia, not Trump. According to the summary by Barr, you were right.......AND I WAS WRONG! 
While it makes no sense to me, that's what it says so congrats on calling that one right!
I haven't seen that or didn't notice it in the summary. But I always thought Trump was their pick.
Piggy backing on the report. not many people have seen the report but it appears, and I have no reason to doubt it, that TRUMPS campaign team was not involved in the Russian interference. I take that as a good thing. I'm glad we don't have a sitting President that did that.
I see a lot of Democrats are irritated Mueller didn't conclude on the 2nd issue. They say the reason the Special Investigator is brought in is precisely to avoid a political appointee like Barr to make the decisions on it. I disagree. I have no reason to doubt Mueller and from my previous career I am well aware of having evidence, but not enough to sway a jury. In many cases we would "punt" to the District Attorneys office to get their input because they would ultimately have to try the case. If Mueller, a seasoned and well respected FBI director, homicide prosecutor, was unsure enough to simply say this report neither indicts or exonerates Trump on the Obstruction charge, and Barr, the AG says there's not enough. I am good with it