I think it's just an assumption on your part. I would need to see data that indicates a person involved in a shooting is more likely to be involved in an unjustified shooting if left on the street. I just don't think that is backed up by stats.
Next, why punish the officer? A lot of cops HATE desk duty. Part of what they joined for was to be on the streets. Unless it is shown there is a danger with it, I wouldn't implement the idea.
1. It is 100% an assumption by me that's why I used the word assume, you even highlighted it.
I'm sure there is data on these situations and I would hope they examine it before the make rules based on my posts on getbig.
A007 you had 30 years on the force, how many shoot outs were you involved in? And out of those how many ended in death?
Did any of the shoot outs change the way you approached the job?
2. I never said punish the officer, he is a HERO. I said if there were residual trauma from that incident, the implication being that he was unable to work a patrol car unit safely and effectively, it would be better for everyone if he worked a desk.
Do you disagree with that?
I made this suggestion because of the amount of ammo he now keeps on his person. Again i'm assuming hes never been in a gunfight like the one mentioned in the video, i'm also assuming the fact that he shot the criminal so many times and that he didn't go down was an abnormality.
That said, when it was all said and down he didnt run out of ammunition. Obviously this event changed how he approaches the job, as it justifiably should. He was in a life and death situation.
Maybe 145 rounds isnt much at all, it only sounds like alot to the public. What was normal for you to carry while on duty?
Thanks