How does SF's post make you feel?
Tell us. Come on...tell us
I honestly do not think you get it. It's not about winning or losing. If someone invites you to an interview to discuss your views on chicken pot pie and you end up spending more time talking about the time you fucked a shemale... need I really point out that the interviewers motives were other than talking about chicken pot pie?
Andrew Neil is a walking syllogistic fallacy. There's no winning or losing, you're invited into a circus and by the time you realize you're part of the circus it's already too late.
This is a good example of how deteriorated Western media has gotten. People can't tell the difference between an interview and an interrogation.
So... you put a fucking fat old bastard, yellow-teeth English muffin in charge of the interviews and... just because he has a English accent... it's supposed to be an intellectual shellacking? Huh?